“There are two major points of Buddhist eschatology the appearance of Maitreya and the Sermon of the Seven Suns.”
The sermon completes with the planet engulfed by a vast inferno after being burned clean by 7 suns. Perhaps the mystics here saw the end of time?
Should we care about the 7 suns?
Naaaaaaaaaaa
We know the earth will die, like us, unless it has a way to escape to better climbs and perhaps it does.
We know this because we are here now.
We are where we are.
Any religion that has an icon, has an eschatology of their return it seems, a beginning and end.
Zen and eschatology comparisons are interesting.
Because nothing written about Zen is true or real.
So what can be compared?
Zen is not Mahayana Buddhism.
Zen is not a teaching of words.
Zen, in its original sense, annihilates the mechanism of teaching.
There is no verbal expression in the existential space of Zen.
But words and books contain the supposed conversation between god and man.
Eschatology of religion arose in the concepts of religion.
Focused on the timeless words between creator and created.
Using this medium we can talk about the history of religion and eschatology of religion.
But Zen is very contrary to this.
There is no eschatology in zen as there is no grammar or logic.
This can be very frustrating to the logical eschatologist don’t you know?!
No shit.
So how is Zen taught if it undercuts words and teaching
This is the genius of Zen.
“Nothing” is communicated from one to another with no words.
Zen is just being yourself here, nothing more or less.
But we live in a world based on verbal and visual communication.
So Zen has never been coherent using the language of things that exist as Zen sets existence aside as vanity.
“Stone is stone, but it is also not stone.”
Existence is annihilated in Zen.
This may sound contradictory and ridiculous to the logical mind.
The annihilation of Logic is the “nothing” state.
“The broad way has no gate.”
Zen negation of existence allows one access to Satori, direct perception, to be, and may be like final participation of Owens minus the logic part of that.
All relativities are transcended.
This is an esoteric approach ultimately.
Usually ‘nothing’ is associated with nihilism.
And nihilism seems like acid to religion.
Zen began by seeing the vanity of all existence and its essential nature is selfish by nature.
Time is already existence.
Zen is not pure philosophy or literature.
Nothing is not nihilistic.
Through the practice of annihilation, being immediately is fresh and mind is fully realized.
One begins to merge with the sky then and is no longer bound to just the earth or existence.
We are freed from our troubled thoughts.
We suspend our judgment of things.
And then we are as a floating cloud or meandering water.
‘Nothing’ is the religious benefit of Zen.
Until you have practiced annihilation of your existence, of language, I sound ridiculous.
When you are ridiculous, we can merge.
Without words = nothing
So what have I said?
My words cancel themselves out.
Nothing/Mu
In Christianity, it’s all about origins and eschatology.
Alpha and Omega.
Dan follows the logical and language route of religion very well.
Few could match his command of language.
Until he met a smelly goat
They say the world could not have been created by natural processes, the divine is involved here and even walks among us.
The “last day” is key to Christian eschatology.
John 6:39
They say jesus walks with us beginning to end until the last day.
There is no origin or eschatology in Zen.
Time is negated by being thrown into nothing.
Past present and future become incomprehensible in zen.
Yet the Zen tradition is filled with koans and stories and words.
This is an apparent contradiction, but are just two sides of the coin.
Zen ignores logic and time.
Heidegger explored nothing/Nichts by saying we need to explore what appears to know it. He was concerned with human existence.
Zen makes no special distinction about humans or rocks.
So the western idea of nothing is not the same as the zen version.
Zen is not homocentric as it sees existence and nothing the same and thus can’t be fully defined, it is esoteric.
Man is man, but not man.
Thus there is no angst in zen.
One can fully realize peace beyond neurosis.
This I think clearly or not so clearly
explains the contradictory positions Dan and I have staked out, not that it matters.
I find it all quite amazing and nothing really.
Yesterday at 8:36 pm by U
» Why are we here?
Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:59 am by dan
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:22 pm by U
» Disclosure - For U by U
Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:08 pm by U
» The scariest character in all fiction
Thu Nov 21, 2024 6:47 pm by U
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U
» Livin Your Best Life
Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk
» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan