The Bible, UFOs, ET and the Ancients Part 3

Ecu_365 wrote:

MD02 wrote:  The better question would be, from watching is what do you think its 'Agenda' is?

I lurked at the old OMF a few years ago. I was not a contributor - nor was I a sock. I was observing a few different UFO forums which all seemed to implode about the same time - from what I discerned to be manufactured drama from the same source. Therefore, I am a bit skeptical about what the overall agenda of the UFO/conspiracy community is.  

Cyrellys wrote:Hey Bard the 14+14 thing I think was a reference to the cultural habits of the "illumined" ones (aka illuminati) who for some reason seem to have a penchant for doing things via number symbology.

Cyrellys wrote:Hey Bard the 14+14 thing I think was a reference to the cultural habits of the "illumined" ones (aka illuminati) who for some reason seem to have a penchant for doing things via number symbology.  At least the ones tending toward the practice of satanism seem to have a requirement to broadcast what they do before they do it and there is usually some sort of numerology pattern involved.

Jake Reason wrote:

Cyrellys wrote:Hey Bard the 14+14 thing I think was a reference to the cultural habits of the "illumined" ones (aka illuminati) who for some reason seem to have a penchant for doing things via number symbology.  At least the ones tending toward the practice of satanism seem to have a requirement to broadcast what they do before they do it and there is usually some sort of numerology pattern involved.

Yes!

However I have only studied the surface of it all and can not say exactly what is meant by the number.

These are occult practices.  They are in the realm of Sorcery.  To manifest a action/force that acts in many ways as a physical force. (example: a psychological wall has the same empowerment of a physical wall).  Demarcation is another form of manifest.  And when occult numerology is employed, it can act to manifest a marking of time/space with a similar empowerment of an actual physical event.  Demarcation/Sorcery.  A "time stamp" is a mark on time/space.  It becomes metaphysically real.

And so by selecting a target date in occult science, they are "time stamping" a metaphysical reality.  And therefore because it has been made real, it therefore exists in time/space = cosmos = part of creation.  

Additionally, in occult practice "permission" is required.  Yes, even Lucifer and Satan must act within the laws.  And a numerology/occult/sorcery - "time/date" has taken on a justification to exist.  Because G-d can not deny that which is part of his creation.

This does not mean G-d is blessing it.  The Creator G-d is impartial to that which takes place in creation within the laws of creation/cosmos.  Acts 10:34 - "G-d is no respecter of persons".    = Free Will sustained = a form of permission.  "Time stamped" so that it can not be denied to rightfully exist.

Occultists believe this form of sorcery empowers their acts to more likely occur.

-------------------

Now having said that, I did not label this story "1/14/14" for numerology reasons.  I simply looked at one of the articles and I noticed the date.  It struck me as an interesting number and so I did a simple numerology math reduction.....

14 reduces this way... 1+4=5  (reduces it to 1 number).

1 + (1=4=5) + (1+4=5)

1+5+5=11

and I stopped reducing there, as 11 happens to be a Master Number!

I highly suspect this is not a coinkidink.  And so I thought it should be noted.

Why?

Because it is the first time that Messianism has been reported and confirmed as a major pro-policy concern of USA's peace planning with Israel.

And the man who voiced it was not only the Secretary of State of the USA (highest authority on US policy) but a member of a most unusually important fraternity while a student in University.

.

dan wrote:Gary,

>>>>>>>>

And here is what I've learned from my years with GFC/SfA.......

Armageddon draws nigh.  It is presaged by the cauldron of postmodernism.  There are two possibilities.......

1.)  Physical Armageddon, or

2.)  Metaphysical Armageddon.  

And I'm Mid-trib wrt #2...... and the only one who can pull that off is X2.  No?  Yes, no!  Technically speaking, I am pre-trib wrt #2.  #2 will not be fully engaged until the anti-X makes the scene, who then turns out to be the X2, just the reverse of what the fundies are expecting, bless their hearts.  

No, we need to be more specific.  Fundies believe......

1.)  that the anti-X precipitates the Armageddon, and

2.)  only after that does the X2 appear.  

This sequence, however, turns out to have been a Bait&Switch.  This will then be understood as the greatest magic trick of all time.  And, yes, it will crucially involve MAJIC.  

No?  Tell me where I'm wrong.  


12:30--------

Ok, so now we understand why Ron chose Lucien for LotP, tomorrow......[The guest will be Lucien Greaves of The Satanic Temple, recently in the news for having organized a satanic rite at the Westboro Baptist Church (godhatesfags.com) of Topeka. Here is an earlier interview.....
http://www.vice.com/read/unmasking-lucien-greaves-aka-doug-mesner-leader-of-the-satanic-temple

Clearly, one could view the rite performed in Topeka as a (reverse?) exorcism. This would characterize my view of the possibly positive role of TST, wrt society at large.]

The Satanists worship the anti-X.  Nay, they hope to make straight the way for the coming of the anti-X, who, even according to their own sub-texts, will turn out to be the X2.  It's just that simple, sports fans.  

Ok, so let me spell this out.......

The predecessor of (postmodern) Satanism was Gnosticism who worshipped the Serpent in the Garden.....

The serpent replied that she would not surely die and that if she eats the fruit of the tree "then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."

Hmmm........

So who was proven right, God or the Serpent?  

They both were, each in their own way.  But, yes, don't play with fire, and do beware of gifts from strangers.  

Also KIM that the next most important representations of the serpent are in the Caduceus and as the Ouroboros > CTC > SWH > BPWH.  


>>>>>>>>

dan wrote:

 Fundies believe......

1.)  that the anti-X precipitates the Armageddon, and

2.)  only after that does the X2 appear.  

Cy wrote:I seen one of the christian blogs note that omen about crows and seagulls attacking the vatican's doves on Monday.  Interesting that the Washington Post picks it up and relays it again.  Sort of like with what happened to FARS news commentary on whatdoesitmean.com's publishing of the original material declaring US Policy is influenced by extraterrestrial contact, and that nazism is deeply involved - gets picked up by Washington Post and parroted/commented on again; like groups having a long distance telephone call on a party line.  

Then Bassett swoops in and declares we should hunt down and shut down whatdoesitmean.com in that other event - will Bassett swoop in and do the same on the doves story?  Will he cheer on doves, or crows, or seagulls?  Because after all despite the fact that whistleblowing is a violation of national security and he makes an exception for Disclosure, will he then say for or against any of the other factions?

Washington Post = state dept under the table statements?  Maybe?

Nazis being adept bureaucrats and all....what was that Joseph Farrell noted about the post-war nazis having a bone to pick with the US, and their 'educating' of the muslims with their old documents.  

Take a close look at what company hires for the NSA et al surveillance grid personnel....what was their WWII connections? (Booz-Allen, Carlisle)  Oh, was that Nazi you say?

Now why would they need to be listening in on all convos?  Recording everything?  Even the German Chancellors dialogs and the average person?

And what's up with the Ukranians?  Who's benefiting there?  Or going to benefit?

Meanwhile FEMA is soliciting again:

Solicitation Number:
HSFE90-13-R-0013
Notice Type:
Solicitation
a. This is a solicitation for a single indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract to obtain evacuation planning and operational support to facilitate a motor coach evacuation of the general population in response to Presidential-Declared Emergencies and Major Disasters within the continental United States.

And while I'm thinking about it, Obama's old mentor Bill Ayer's has a biographical query in the headlines about his 're-education camps'....

Other than that, in the wake of Obama's purges in the military, the Bush/Obama buddy Tester of Montana is backing nuclear forces review because "I think it's the right thing to do.  Let's get it figured out."  And no one needs to be too concerned because Tester is confident it won't impact the future of Malmstrom AFB.

I wonder if Tester was on the memo recipients list from ET, that the ptb are not allowed to use weapons of mass destruction to depopulate?  Probably not, but then it's doubtful anyone would present the std litmus test to him about if he would fire a weapon on unarmed civilians if so ordered...him being a Senator and all, he doesn't get his hands that dirty.

I just come from making my monthly Toastmasters speech laying this stuff out for the local intellectuals & political/business leaders.  And to illustrate my layout I almost attended wearing my barn clothes.  They've been rightly concerned lately about the people's "consent to govern."  So if I'd worn my barn clothes I could have said in my speech that the whole paradigm was dirty and really stinky.  But I didn't because I gave them the credit due that it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that part out.

And I was right.  They were already there.

Lol.  Cy

Cy wrote:Re: Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things - Cyrellys
 Today at 11:42 am by Cyrellys (Online)

Well, during homeschool today I have been assaulted by teenage discoveries in "your mama" quips from the internet including ones like this:

Your mama is so fat, that when she went swimming out in the Pacific ocean a group of whales came swimming along singing we-are-family! even though you're bigger than me!!!

Your mama is so fat, that when she went swimming in the Atlantic ocean and Spain claimed her as a new world.

And then there were a series of similar ones that exceed re-publishing discretion and decency.

MEANWHILE

Putin is reported as slamming 'morally bankrupt America who is godless now'.

 http://patdollard.com/2014/01/putin-slams-morally-bankrupt-america-whos-godless-now/


Whelp there is nothing sane nor sacred these days.  Maybe. 

But then Putin is still focused on the recent policy topic (01-14-14 ?):

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a recent keynote speech. “Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”

Cy
-- Truth is stranger than fiction.

ScaRZ wrote:

Always keep in mind,"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:" .........Here we see once again that the broad way (Most traveled or most popular way)........leads to destruction.

Bard wrote:

Where exactly is the narrow gate or for that matter - what does it look like?  Some who walk alone in their quest towards God, are always being suggested to, that they are not on the narrow path.  Who defines the narrow path? Men? Christians? Pastors? Who has the authority to claim they 'know' the narrow way or does God naturally have that function?

Does God speak to us all in the same manner? Are all our walks the same?

If perse one Billion Christians, profess to Christ and the Father in prayer, how many are on the narrow way? All? Some? Few? Is it all of them vs a world that does not?  

What exactly is the 'most popular way'? How do you define this?

Should we return to the days of stoning as punishments for gathering sticks on Sabbath as Moses did - or did Christ bring us something more to consider – something far greater?  

Questions, normally unacceptable within church walls, asked here, should naturally be asked.

ScaRZ wrote:
The words were from Jesus Christ. A great teaching from The Lord that I believe show those "Of The World" and those who are "Not Of The World". It's all about the childern of darkness......."Those of the night" and the childern of the light........"Those of the day".

As Jesus Christ said........"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."(Matthew 7:14) Jesus Christ is teaching using prophecy of how only a few will receive the gift of eternal life. Remember Jesus Christ is The Way..........."He is the Narrow". The vast majority take the "Broad" way that is not Jesus Christ and it leads away from eternal life and ends with destruction. The Adversary is the Broad......."The Destroyer".

I used the term "The Most Popular" because I believe it fits very well in our thinking of today. It is suited to the means of the majority or widely accepted.

Bard wrote:

So, only those who profess to be Christian, are on the Narrow way? All Christians despite the actions they take through life? Wearing one face - but presenting another? Are they also the narrow-walkers?

ScaRZ wrote:
People can profess anything but does that make it so?......"No it doesn't". A person must truly be "In Jesus Christ". Lip service isn't worth much,it's about bearing good fruit. No Christian however is perfect,we do all fall short......"We do sin,we are hard headed,we don't listen,we act before we think,we rebel". Just like human parents needing to chastise their childern so to does The Father need to chastise his childern at times. Sometimes we stray and need only a good firm yank to get us back in line facing the right direction. Many times it takes more than a good firm yank.

 

Theologically speaking, we know that as long as you ask for forgiveness for that action, you will be absolved, but what if it is chronic? Two cheek limits?

ScaRZ wrote:I believe anyone can stray too far and not care of returning too The Lord. I believe The Lord will never leave or foresake me but I believe I can leave and foresake him. I believe a Christian can "Fall Away". Apostasy isn't apostasy if one can not choose abandonment.

If a holy-man, peeks through your windows day/night, with a pseudo-omnipotence, technologically speaking, does this take them further or closer to the narrow-way?

ScaRZ wrote:If he isn't genuine he is already far from The Narrow.

Did Jesus promote the practice of temple spies in the name of the Lord and or the Father?  I honestly need to find an answer to that one question.

ScaRZ wrote:Lay it out more clearly in words....."Explain in greater detail what you are referring to."

Bard wrote:Just curious if Jesus condoned, spoke about, or discussed spies.

How would he view them?

Bard wrote:Just curious if Jesus condoned, spoke about, or discussed spies.

How would he view them?