Dan I have been over the course of these years slowly exposing you to a body of knowledge beyond your narrow scholarship. It is a body of knowledge that deeply pertains both to what you are striving to do AND to the situational landscape. Because we have BEEN HERE BEFORE. However your model does not acknowledge that nor even recognize it.
This is something Jake and I have in common. He both recognizes it AND acknowledges it.
If your scholarship would extend to learn what I've been teaching you would already know that I espouse that we all stem from a single source. And you would know that in the Old Irish "proverbs" as Jake called them which I gave here recently was a matrix of multi-tiered meaning. Remember the ancient wisdom is triadic. This conveys that for every tidbit there is a complex of information which is being conveyed.
This is part of the legacy of an ancient technological civilization.
We are on the cusp of the same troubles and questions that the other civilization failed at. Not that it could not have found a resolution, but that they were interupted by a planetary cataclysm that stripped all opportunity to find those solutions for them. This is a repeat of history. The oldest histories on the planet have small pieces of the wisdom gained in those late days. Now we can avail ourselves of those few and remote voices or we can continue to ignore and misconstrue what they are saying in our need for speed and results.
What I have been saying is not fear mongering, polarizing, nor demonizing. It is constructive criticism at times, advice and adjustment (triad)in others. Great conversations are one means of illumination.
What you and I participate in here, since you have yesterday so graciously admitted in the open to your intent with the NWO, something I was well aware of, but I think was news to Jake and undoubtedly others, is what is called SANCTIONING.
In SANCTIONING, we are concerned primarily with the concept of
"Fitness to Rule". There is an old phrase,
"the land and the King are One." This refers, in a following regression whose most modern stages are symbolic and become more an application the further back on the timeline you trail it, to the Rites of Sovereignty. Politicians and others who claim that sovereignty is absolute ownership misunderstand the source of sovereignty. It is not about personal power. Sovereignty is both the right to rule and the obligation to rule rightly. It is about SACRIFICE. Now the definition of sacrifice in this archaic principle is different in respect to our modern definition. Secret societies twist it to mean a gift in which a life is lost to sanction receipt of power and perform ridiculous ceremonies of killing animals or people.
...understanding of sovereignty – that it is really a body of lore that is speaking about a flow that occurs between the land, the people, and the sovereign. Right-relationship is definitely central here too. That’s clear with the emphasis on integrity of judgement, integrity of speech, and integrity in body. The land is a conduit. It is through the proverbial
land in the Collective Soul, and the literal land (biosphere) in our landscape or
representative of the land which Jake's
Ghost in the Machine speaks. A representative of the land is/was trained to the highest degree in the imbas skills to recognize that
Force and its methods of conveyance and activity among us in our environment. Thus a large part of SANCTIONING is about establishing relationship. Fitness to Rule.
True Sovereignty is a reciprocal relationship and right-relationship. Sovereignty is then a relationship about power, something held between the sovereign and the people, and not about the sovereign forcing his or her will upon the people. But modern powers, among the people and over the people, act as though they do not understand this.
So here we have that missing element. Sovereignty is not equivalent to freedom or autonomy. To be a sovereign whether as a rule, a governance, or an individual is to be bound. He/it has not simply claimed the sovereignty; he has been claimed by it.
Thus are conversations such as this between Dan and I. Dan attempts to convert me to his modern justification for the "fitness to rule" in his NWO and I intervene with indications that the Ghost in the Machine does not agree. This is part of the Rites of Sovereignty, where the land sovereigns convene before the king makers to discuss the potential Sanctioning. It is an undercurrent here and in prior events at OMF most would never recognize. This is part of the significance of the Black Swan. The unexpected element which is the Force in action.
Thus one of the many layers of complexity in which we speak.
Dan you interpret my conversation as a form of obstruction rather than a form of adjustment. Knowledge is given as a means to inform. To provide the tools to see in a more coherent manner so that thought, philosophy, and judgement might result in a more just and right application where integrity is upheld.
Because, you see, the power doesn’t only flow from the land to the sovereign – it flows through him/it and back to the land. In the act of taking kingship/leadership/governance, it has both literally and symbolically merged with the land (thus, the union/relationship with the representative of sovereignty). When a power takes up the kingship/leadership/governance, his/its life is no longer his/its own – it becomes one with the life of the land/Ghost in the Machine/Universal Source.
This is the imperative for conversations such as Dan and I hold.
I show him a link such as this one from earlier:
side note: fyi http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8396
It depicts a ripple in time, a disturbance in the fabric of our truths, to which the Ghost in the Machine responds. There are valid concerns expressed there which go un-addressed in a certain venue seeking sanction. This is not fear mongering, polarization as expressed by Dan. It is presentation of an unfitness for the emphasis in integrity of judgement, integrity of speech, and integrity in body.
We don't necessarily through the baby out with the bathwater. Global governance is a necessity in the face of unambiguous contact and a necessary step in coherency of human self-sufficiency and spiritual evolution. The question raging across the internet is how best to accomplish it. The political right accuse the elites of moving on it without inclusion or respect of natural rights and representation. The same accusation leveled on the British Crown in 1775. The Elites and their mouth pieces turn around and snarl at the protesters accusations of extremism, small-mindedness, and gun-hugging. Refusing to recognize the meaning in each claim and request for recourse. But the system they are building shall have no recourse, no right to claim, and only a token representation present if the more generous of the elite constructionist have their way.
Is it any wonder of all the people the Source could have asked the ancients to approach to return would be one capable of having discourse in Sanctioning? That when a young illuminist says to me a year ago,
"And how do you know so much? You know you're not allowed to...," I am both free and obligated to respond in kind,
"lol my friend, there are some things in this world far older than even the illumined ones." ~ 16 months ago.
Today at 1:22 pm by Big Bunny Love
» Why are we here?
Today at 6:03 am by dan
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:34 pm by Mr. Janus
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:13 am by Mr. Janus
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:41 am by Mr. Janus
» CockaWHO!?
Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:41 pm by Mr. Janus
» Scientists plan DNA hunt for Loch Ness monster next month
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:32 am by Mr. Janus
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Sat Mar 16, 2024 12:01 am by Mr. Janus
» Earth Intelligence
Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:04 am by Mr. Janus