The Bible, UFOs, ET and the Ancients Part 3

mdonnall2002 wrote:Get those secret shakes down, Jake!

I spent some time yesterday viewing a bit more on the Mormons rites, rituals, and ex-members testimonials.

Jake Reason wrote: If Romney becomes President, I think we can presume that a Mass Indoctrination campaign will be propagated through the American social consciousness to make it politically incorrect to express intolerance toward cults.

Dumb-down and confuse the masses, making it increasingly easier to divide, conquer, overrule and control.

ScaRZ wrote:Jake when I read your post I thought of Billy Graham.

ScaRZ wrote:I wonder if Tom Cruise was running for President would Graham’s Evangelistic Association ease up on Scientology.

What other compromises would you be willing to make for political purposes?

Jake Reason wrote:
What's the difference between the Trilateralists and the Oath Keepers?

Nib wrote:You guys have been busy in here, excellent read and a beautiful start to ScaRZ continuation of this wonderful topic..!

Need to do some "link" reading and catching up. Eth would be happy to see this conversation on going..

Nib, you arrive on schedule. I've been getting 'schooled' in here during your absence - as suspected?

Anyone want to reach out to 'Bewildered'? I enjoyed his insights and stories. Where would be our lonely 'Dove'?

What other names should we enlist in the search?

Welcome back to the realm of Scarz.
Let's hope your nemesis doesn't arrive

Jake Reason wrote:I'd bet dollars-to-donuts that Colin Powell votes for Mitt Romney. Even though he endorsed Barrack Obama for President in 2008.

Yes I know this is an odd opening comment, but hopefully I can explain how this fits into the grand scheme of things.

We've got a 'War of the Worlds' raging on planet earth. And there is going to be a lot of Topsy-turvy Flip-flopping going on down here.

Cy,
Without going into a more complete history for you to wade through, let me just say a few things about the Tri-Lateral Commission. I'll start with a few lines from Barry Goldwater's autobiography:

With No Apologies

By Senator Barry Goldwater; copyright 1979 by Barry Goldwater; published by William Morrow and Company, Inc.; 105 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016; ISBN:0-688-03547-7.
~

In his book With No Apologies (1979), Senator Barry Goldwater writes:

"The C.F.R. is the American branch of a society which originated in England. Internationalistic in viewpoint, the C.F.R., along with the Atlantic Union Movement, and the Atlantic Council of the U.S., believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established ... What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the world ... In my view, the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical." (With No Apologies, [1979], Senator Barry Goldwater pp. 128, 284).

~
Senator Goldwater also noted: "David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski found Jimmy Carter their ideal candidate. They helped him win the nomination and the presidency. To accomplish this purpose, they mobilized the money power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community-which is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations -- and the media controllers represented in the membership of the CFR and the Trilateral." ( 1; p. 286.) Senator Goldwater continued, "Brzezinski and Rockefeller invited Carter to be a member of the Trilateral Commission in 1973. They immediately began grooming him for the Presidency ... We have arrived at our present position of peril in the world and at home because our leaders have refused to tell us the truth ... unless we, who profess to believe in freedom, wake up, the world is headed for a period of slavery." (p. 299)

Cy, it all begins back in 1891 in London, when Sir Cecil Rhodes created a secret society which would later be known as the "Rhodes Round Table groups". He patterned his secret society after the template of the Jesuits, with an inner core of "the elect" (meaning, the "elite") and an outer circle of trusted workers. Outside that circle they enlisted many sympathetic workers to do the actual work of the society. Rhodes did this with the help of Lord Alfred Milner and W.T. Stead and Lord Rothschild in his inner circle. By the earliest 1900s they had taken over the editorship of the Times of London, and to foment World War I they created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in England. The RIIA met with Woodrow Wilson's "Inqjiry" at the 1919 Paris Peace Accords, where they chummed it up and decided mutually to create an American version of the RIIA. By 1921 they opened the doors to the American version at the Pratt House in New York City. They named it the Council on Foreign Affairs (CFR). It was to primarily control the American press and infiltrate and dominate the U.S. State Department for to control American foreign policy.
All of that was coordinated through the great tax-exempt Foundations such as Carnegie, Ford, Rockefeller, and Morgan - the same interests who gave us in 1913 the Federal Reserve and the Federal income tax, both of which are un-Constitutional. As Goldwater advised us in his autobiography, this is a group of people hell-bent on a one-world government, and they want England and their surrogate (The USA) to run the thing.
I believe it was around 1974 that David Rockefeller went to Zbigniew Brzezinski and asked him to help create the Tri-Lateral Commission, which would have the goal of focusing the world's economic/financial movements into three primary regions - Europe, the Americas, and the far-Pacific (Asian) sectors. (They have since added a fourth, Africa.) The idea behind the Tri-Lateral is to perfect regional trade regions and then merge them into one globally-governed economic bloc of concentrated wealth and power. All of this traces directly back to the Rhodes Round Table groups.

I could write you a book about all the fill-in details I'm not going to ask you to read in this reply, but suffice to say that the only thing Oath Keepers has in common with the Tri-Lateral Commission is that the Tri-Lateral traces back to a guy who's name was Rhodes, and Oath Keepers was founded by a guy named Rhodes. (They are no relation) That is the only connection anyone could ever imagine, and as you might guess, that's quite a long shot, lol.

Oath Keepers believes in national sovereignty. We want America to remain America, and we oppose a one-world government. Tri-Laterals want a one-world government. In a one-world government nations have reduced or no sovereignty, being subject to the higher authority of the World Court, which can over-ride the Constitution of any member nation-state. For that reason, Oath Keepers fights against the new world order's one-world government. The hierarchy of authority in the one-world government, sponsored by the United Nations (UN) is approached through the IMF/World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the World Court, the Bank for International Settlements, the Federal Reserve, the UN Security Council, NATO and other international treaties, NAFTA and CAFTA, the European Union, the North American Union (SPP), etc. All of those things work to erode American sovereignty and undermine our Constitution. When they finally break this country we will lose our fabled Bill of Rights and our Constitution will be forced to change to incorporate global mandates, such as turning in all our personal weapons. Oath Keepers is based on Article VI which mandates the Oath. Without our Constitution there could be no Oath Keepers organization.The Constitution would be only an antique artifact to be remembered by future historians. And I'll be dead, because I will refuse to live in that sort of oligarchy with its corporate-fascist global police-state enforcement of the "rights and duties of citizenship".

author identity withheld...

The world will hate you not for what you believe, but for whom you believe in. It is the name of Jesus that stirs ire.
The World Will Hate You Not For What You Believe
Some time ago a man in Oregon was sentenced to, and has begun serving thirty days in jail for collecting rainwater on his own property. Yes, you read that correctly…thirty days for collecting rainwater.
In and of itself, although disturbing on some freedom loving level, this news doesn’t really affect the general populace. We tend to overlook far graver things, pretending as though they never were, because we don’t like that sinking feeling in the pit of our stomach, or the conscious realization that the nation, and the world has changed around us, and not for the better. We rationalize the heinous, and at best shrug our shoulders and think to ourselves, ‘it’s not my fight…I guess I’ll just stay out of it.’
No, I’m not asking to start a petition on behalf of this man, or write a letter to your congressman, truth be told, most of you will be wholly unaffected by one man’s incarceration. I mention this event however, to put before you a different supposition, a different hypothetical situation, just so you could gauge what is not only possible, but very probable in the near future.
Imagine that you were not accused of something as inoffensive as collecting rainwater, but something far direr, such as being an enemy of progress. Imagine that overnight, what you believe, and what has become the foundation of your existence, will suddenly be outlawed and deemed as offensive to the state. The truly draconian thing in this supposition is that progress is now subjectively defined by those who would do away with the very memory of God, never mind His servants.
Is the wholesale murder of unborn babies progress? Many today would shout a resounding ‘yes’ to that question. Is the forsaking of basic morality progress? Once again, many would say ‘yes.’
Is the fact that rebellion against parents has become common place, teen pregnancies are spiking and out of control, hedonism has reached an all-time high, and the church is looking more like the world every day progress? It all depends on who you ask, but more and more individuals are embracing lawlessness as though it were some new and heretofore unexplored facet of human existence.
What do you think will happen to you, if at some point, some individual or other has the epiphany that if they got rid of all the Bible bangers, all the rigid, unbending moralists, they could finally have the utopia they’ve been dreaming of?
The pattern is evident for those who know what to look for, and I’ve been talking about it for the past few years now. First you marginalize a certain segment or group, then you demonize them, then you criminalize them. In three easy steps you have the scapegoat for every bad thing that is happening, and you can do away with a group of individuals that frankly stick in your craw.
Even though I’ve been traveling back and forth to Romania, I still keep abreast of what is happening in America, and things seem to be escalating quicker than anyone thought possible.
Both the media and governmental agencies seem to be on an all-out campaign of pin the tail on the bigot, and if you happen to disagree, or see a certain practice as immoral, well, then you’re it!
I fear things will only escalate, and what will be allowed to go on in the land of the free and the home of the brave under the guise of the greater good, is as yet, for many, unimaginable.
Matthew 10:21-22, “Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children ill rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death. And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.”
The world will hate you not for what you believe, but for whom you believe in. It is the name of Jesus that stirs ire. It is the name of Jesus that fuels an uncharacteristic rage in certain individuals, because they hate God and anyone who loves Him. You don’t see this kind of vitriol leveled against Buddhists, or Muslims, or Hindus…just the followers of Jesus.
Hopefully by now we are beginning to understand that Jesus was not exaggerating. One of the most dangerous things we can do as believers is take the words of Jesus, and the forewarnings of the Bible concerning the days we are living in, and write them off as embellished, inflated, or exaggerated.
God forewarned His children for a purpose, but if His children will not believe Him at His word because pre-established denominational dogma contradicts the words of God, then when the hammer drops and the lights go out, we have no one to blame for our spiritual unpreparedness but ourselves.
With love in Christ,
Michael Boldea Jr.

Gentlemen:
I have maintained a very low profile for several weeks while receiving information from long time operatives personally known to me from deep past archive files, that are just now surfacing. The depth and breadth of the potential here is staggering as it contains confirmable origins and operational capability beyond project planning. Therefore, I will present it as is, with the viewpoint that the plans are underway to physically integrate them with existing regional forces (domestic and foreign), but are short of actual in-field implementation approval and/or support prior to trip wire events over the next 60 days.
Descriptive name discussed, but unofficial until activation:
P.F.(NAME's ABBREVIATED FOR SOURCE SAKE) refers to the offensive plans to be used against those in the rural areas that will present the greatest resistance to active military or militarized police units in the event of martial law operations. Classified (B.B.) this would be the citizen militias or other organized armed groups either "good or bad" that are expected to emerge in the aftermath of a major domestic event, i.e. following the election or financial collapse. Selected FEMA camps separate from "civilian"resettlement camps would house, interrogate and deal with captured armed combatants. These camps would be staffed by Spetznaz or Asian troops specializing in interrogation techniques without equal. It was suggested that these camps are underground exclusively. (A.H.) describes the type of operation utilizing Native American people's grounds and resources similar to the active preps being made in the western South Dakota and eastern Wyoming region known by a resource in that area. B.H. is the term for very rural, previously abandoned, WWII vintage aerodromes or former private airstrips that now are used or where applicable can house advanced drones with aggressive weapons platforms.That is why, in my mind, so many are and will be deceived. There are no training courses available for understanding the origin, content and direction this is going to go except that which is found in the Bible, Godly visions by Godly people, and the strange meaning of the phrase---"as in the days of Noah...." TO GOD BE THE GLORY!