The anatomy of Disclosure..........
There have not been any options to the best possible Disclosure..... certainly not in retrospect.
Our main competition might be the Rama group, but it is not standing up.
Our apparent competition, TTSA, is almost certainly connected with ours.
There is only one person still posturing for a literal ET type disclosure, and that is my old acquaintance, Steve Bassett. His is a rather lonely voice.
Everyone else, still standing, sees Disclosure as heavily oriented toward the paranormal and consciousness.
Even the second ‘witness’, with the TTSA/Nimitz event, is oriented toward a strictly mental aspect of the incident.
Yes, astronomers keep up the steady drumbeat of discovering new planets, and speculating about ETI........ but where’s the beef? The beef is in the continuing, very considerable, state support of the astromical community, internationally.
Yes, there is still a considerable amount of momentum left in the blue sky dreams, and in the prestige of conquering space.
Otherwise, friends, it’s a very small world out there...... and there is only one candidate for queen bee.
What else would we expect...... other than a small, personal world?
And would there not have to be a governmental connection? If we rule out the United Nations as be much too unwieldy and impersonal, we might have to appreciate the personal shenanigans of donny. There may be something more deliberate going on.
If there is any cosmic deliberation, where else might we have been looking, yesterday, but to a back porch in Virginia? Is this rocket science, or what? I ask you?
So, then, what are we waiting for....... what is the hold up?
The cards have all been played, now. The last two cards were Brazil and, yes, the White House card, finally, sports fans.
We’re just waiting for a few other folks to begin connecting these dots.
Yes, immaterialism/personalism presents a major cultural barrier, until you give it something more than just a cursory glance.
I do not have proof of any one of the several critical cards that we are alleged to hold. There is not a smoking gun.
The New York Times is not onto this trail. The Grey Lady has been spooked of, for the nonce.
It’s up to individual persons to step up to the BPW plate. How many more years will this personal initiative require?
I seriously doubt that we are looking at years. More likely, we’re going to see a few months of some rather convoluted personal politics. Things may get a bit more interesting for the patient observer/participators.
If there is any truth to any of this, there will be a great deal of synergy, just beneath the surface. Yes, there will be a hundredth monkey effect. Who wants to be that one?
One of the people, out at the Lake, behind the scenes, I’ve already been encouraged to contact. Who knows what other cards any such person might be willing and able to bring to this table?
Besides the hundredth monkey, we also must be watching out for the straw that will break this camel’s back.
How many straws do we already have? How many straws make a haystack?
Philosophically, this is known as the sorites paradox. The upshot of this paradox is that the answer is almost entirely subjective.
I would maintain that we have the synergy between the concept of a gestalt switch and the sorites problem. Things get extremely subjective, extremely quickly, when dealing with such a convoluted question.
Perhaps the trickiest question, among tricky questions, is what the heck are we going to do with the prophetic tradition? As if this weren’t the gorilla in the room? Yes, I’ve already put my chips down on this question, and I don’t think that any one of us is going to be able to avoid it.
I’d wager that it’s precisely this gorilla which is accounting for at least half of the procrastination/convolution that we’ve been witnessing in the Disclosure arena.
Here’s an analogue to our present phenomenological problem......
The astronaut is about to blast off........ should she be thinking about the one million parts, each built by the lowest bidder, beneath her, or about the Moon above?
Our situation with regard to ‘evolution’ is similar.......
Are we sitting on a million random parts, or are we ascending a great chain of being?
Are we a cancer on a planet, or a chrysalis about to hatch?
Such larger considerations are going to bias our weighing of the ‘evidence’, irretrievably.
Yes, sports fans, we do have a dog in this hunt. I dare you to enter the quest for truth, with no bias. 99.9% of the scientists are doing it for a livelihood.
Then you have to decide between the two theories of truth....... the correspondence theory and the coherence theory.