by dan Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:18 am
Yes, the best possible world is a system, but it is a system that is buried within every one of us, personally.
It will come to the surface in good time, but only at the behest of each one of us, voluntarily.
We can’t hurry love...... we cannot storm the gates of heaven.
Love abides.
My advice to Ron....... do not mention my name again with Kevin.
We do not kick sleeping individuals.
Kevin and Joe may be standing right beside a portal. That does not mean that they are awake to what must lie on the other side.
There are connections which must be made. It takes time. It must come from within.
We can all see the ordinary world around us. Science can measure the ordinary. Truth is hidden in the ordinary...... Truth can shine in the extraordinary.
We must first let our little ‘ordinary’ lights shine...... before we may fully grasp the extraordinary.
I believe we see that with the Princess.... through the Princess. Kevin, bless his heart, is not a substitute.
Kevin was expected to take the heat off the Princess.
Kevin is simply telling us that he is not the one to do that.
A decision point for Kevin may come with respect to Grant’s show. Will he refuse an invitation...... with or without me? At this point, there is no point in my appearing again, alone. Nothing will have changed, as far as Grant is concerned.
Kevin has written a report. Others have seen it.
Is he now going to hide his report under a bushel?
Perhaps Grant should call Joe. Joe is very aware of this report.
10:30........
A word that I have seldom used is the transpersonal. This word stems from the collective unconscious.
This word has nothing to do with transhumanism. That is a word that is sometimes applied to artificial intelligence. I offer precious little credence to anything that smacks of Strong AI. In fact, I would pose that cosmology implied in the technological Singularity of transhumanism gives the lie to Strong AI.
What is a personalist supposed to make of the transpersonal?
For a personalist who is also a monist, it is a no brainer.
Does it make any sense for a personalist to not be a monist? I claim not.
The burden of proof would be on the agnostic existentialist to explain how persons might arise, either without a Source or without a Telos.
Was personhood just floating in the void...... waiting to be discovered?
We, persons are nothing, if not social. I merely suggest that we are not atoms in the void, but more like icebergs floating in an ocean. Mystics speak of an oceanic feeling.
12:50.........
An ocean is hardly personal. Next to empty space, it is the most impersonal thing we can imagine.
This ‘ocean’ is the sort of thing that pantheists and panpsychists have in mind, it is easy for us to imagine.
The problem with this picture is that it is basically dualistic. It starts with the assumption of a material world and then distributes a mind like substance throughout it. That is what the ‘pan-‘ is referring to. It is a cloud like, distributed intelligence or sentience.
The idea of distributed intelligence is also found in informationalism. Informationalism does have its non-dual ontology to recommend it. And quantum theory, especially when viewed as a field theory, does seem to point in this direction.
But, without a backdrop of absolute space, we have no way to contain this information. It’s hard to imagine information without a substrate of some sort.
1:50........
Thank you, smelly. I figured I was just plagiarising/paraphrasing you.
In the backdrop to these speculations, is the notion raised yesterday of a ‘system’, as it might apply to the disclosure process..... another rather impersonal metaphor.
The idea of the collective unconscious of Jung hardly does anything to render the world warm and fuzzy.
2:05........
PF,
I read fiction, but I can’t read your mind.
Personalism is the odd belief that the transpersonal is not also transhuman.
It seems virtually self-contradictory.
I’m saying that the transpersonal is actually just interpersonal, where the interpersonal is something rather more than just social. When we say collective unconscious, we might also say social unconscious. It is a place from which love would have to emerge.
I’m suggesting that human potential is infinite. Our world..... the world is unobstructed with regard to sapience. There are no more boundaries between us and anything transcendental.
Not even our bodies......? Our bodies are our final illusion. We are self-transcendent, in other words. That is communion with the cosmic Self..... the Source..... the Telos.
And how do we prove this.....? The proof will ultimately have to be in the cosmic pudding..... the Monad. Along the way, the Hive will do just fine, thank you very much.
4...........
Any sort of pantheism requires a frame.
The frame for panentheism is a society of persons. I often reference the cosmic Self. One might wonder if that is a transhuman.
I have referred to us as being the brain cells of God..... again suggesting something transhuman...... something over and above.
The same could be said for the Source and the Telos..... ie. the Monad.
The closed timelike curve (CTC) of the small world hypothesis (SWH) allows us greater flexibility in how we treat the notion of a Godhead. Our communion with the Godhead has two aspects or dimensions, in accord with the two dimensions of time......the historical/experiential time and the logical/transcendental dimensions of ‘deep’ time..... deep psyche.
We have both the temporal and transcendental aspects of God. We have the communion within ourselves and the communion at the ends of time.
Our communion within is personal in the direction of the transcendental. Our communion without is more interpersonal.
There is a strongly teleological element. It operates in both dimensions. The deep psyche eventually aligns itself with the interpersonal/historical dimension.
Teilhard referred to the Noosphere. One aspect of that is our wired planet. The internet acts as a kind of x-ray of God. It takes a bit of the mystery out of God. It greatly facilitates the interpersonal without overshadowing the personal. There is no superhuman genii inside the internet...... not that I know of, anyway. In short it is a tool. An amplifier of everyone’s personhood...... potentially, at least.
(cont.......)
Last edited by dan on Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:50 pm; edited 11 times in total
Yesterday at 10:08 pm by U
» Why are we here?
Yesterday at 8:31 pm by Post Eschaton Punk
» The scariest character in all fiction
Yesterday at 6:47 pm by U
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:16 am by U
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U
» Livin Your Best Life
Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:19 am by U
» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan