Open Minds Forum



Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Open Minds Forum

Open Minds Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.

Latest topics

» Why are we here?
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeToday at 7:55 am by dan

» Disclosure - For U by U
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeFri Nov 15, 2024 12:39 am by U

» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeFri Nov 15, 2024 12:16 am by U

» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeSun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus

» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeSat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U

» Livin Your Best Life
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeWed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk

» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeWed Nov 06, 2024 12:19 am by U

» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeSun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan

» THE ORIGINAL OPEN MINDS FORUM
Three in One - Page 12 Icon_minitimeTue Oct 01, 2024 11:32 pm by Mr. Janus

Where did all the Open Minds Forum members go?

Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:29 pm by Admin

With Open Minds Forum restored now for almost half a year at it's new location with forumotion.com we can now turn to look at reaching out to OMF's original members who have not yet returned home. OMF's original membership was over 6,000 members strong, prior to the proboards suspension, according to the rolls of the time. We can probably safely assume that some of those accounts were unidentified socks. If we were to assume a reasonable guess of maybe as many as 30% possible sock accounts then that would leave potentially somewhere between 4800 to 4900 possible real members to locate. That is still a substantial number of people.

Who were all these people? Some were average individuals with common interests in ufology, exopolitics, globalism, corruption, earthchanges, science and technology, and a variety of other interests. Some just enjoyed being part of a vibrant and unusually interesting community. Others were representative of various insider groups participating in observation and outreach projects, while still others were bonafide intelligence community personnel. All with stake in the hunt for truth in one fashion or another. Some in support of truth, and communication. Others seeking real disclosure and forms of proof. And others highly skeptical of anything or limited subjects. The smallest division of membership being wholly anti-disclosure oriented.

So where did these members vanish to? They had many options. There are almost innumerable other forums out there on the topics of UFO's or Exopolitics, the Unexplained, and Conspiracy Theory. Did they disappear into the world-wide network of forum inhabitants? Did some go find new homes on chatrooms or individual blogs? Did they participate in ufo conventions or other public events and gatherings? How about those who represented groups in special access? Or IC and military observers? Those with academic affiliations? Where did they all go and what would be the best way to reach out and extend an invitation to return?

And what constitutes a situation deserving of their time and participation? Is the archive enough? How exactly do people within the paradigm most desire to define a community? Is it amenities, humanity or simply population size for exposure? Most of the special guests have been emailed and have expressed that population size for exposure is what most motivates them. But not all. Long-time member Dan Smith has other priorities and values motivating his participation. Should this open opportunities for unattached junior guests who have experience and dialog to contribute to the world? How best to make use of OMF's time, experience and resources?

Many skeptics would like to see the historical guardian of discourse opportunity to just up and disappear; go into permanent stasis. They think that not everyone has a right to speak about their experiences and if there is no proof involved then there can philosophically be no value to discourse. I personally would respectfully disagree with them. Discourse has always been the prelude to meaningful relationships and meaningful mutual relationships have always been the prelude to exchanges of proof. In a contentious social environment with regards to communication vs disclosure how do we best re-establish a haven for those preludes? Is it only the "if we build it they will come" answer? Well considering OMF has been largely fully functional over the last four or five months this line of reasoning is not necessarily true. So what would be the best way re-establish this? Your suggestions are sought. Please comment.





November 2024

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Calendar Calendar


+19
mion
Course Catalog
Cuan Scott
AtomicBrando
GSB/SSR
Just wandering
Cheguevoblin
Foot Mann
Z
99
DrZaius
whoknows
@awestruckt
hobbit
Post Eschaton Punk
GrandCru
jofo
Sign
dan
23 posters

    Three in One

    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9439
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Three in One

    Post by dan Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:26 am

    First topic message reminder :

    Here we have a slightly new departure, inspired by desert dweller.

    Let’s see what happens.  Hopefully, we’ll come up with a better title.  

    This is a slight detour from the Great Distraction in the Sky.  

    Yes, I have claimed to be a monist, but it seems that you can’t be a monist and Personalist at the same time.  More technically, we’re talking three persons in one substance.  

    There is to be a strong emphasis on history, as inspired by Joachim da Fiore, where Disclosure leads us into the age of the Spirit.  

    Folks who don’t buy into this Metanarrative are welcome to argue against it, but they are not welcome to be continually advocating some alternative or for nothing.  

    Personalism is the name of this Game.  

    All other gamers are invited to state their games, but game elsewhere.  Thanks for the understanding.  

    I hope that this will reduce the confusion in these parts.

    And I do hope and trust to have the continued understanding of Cyrellys.  If an open mind is not to lead to nihilism, we must respect the personal nature of mind and of mind’s ‘objects’.  


    9..........

    There are several artifacts that need pointing out...... specific links will be given later.......

    The mnemonic

    The earlier blogs and websites.  

    The abortive BPWiki..... it should be resurrected, in due course.

    KWF and the Chronicles

    There are various YouTube channels, which might be pointed to.

    Etc.......


    We must respect other persons, at all times.  

    We must respect others’ opinion, as long as those opinions may be cogently argued, and that includes arguing that said opinions deserve the label of being a better BPWH.  And, by the way, that mnemonic is for best possible world hypothesis.  


    SR,

    Hang in there, please.  

    Let me say, however, that there is no outside.  smelly is as near to the outside as you are liable to see in this world.  The outside is parasitic upon the inside, as you may see, pretty clearly in this case.  

    What we so faciley refer to as the ‘objective’ is actually the intersubjective.  That is the sense in which I am a monist.  The Monad is the One substance in which all persons reside.  All persons are equal, but, historically, three persons stand out.  In the patriarchal nomenclature of the historian, Joachim da Fiore, we have the age of the father, the age of the son, and the age of the spirit, aka the Aquarian age.    


    10:10.........

    To inaugurate the Aquarian age, we have TSA, which was just to provide an excuse for the grey lady to clamber aboard.  Following that will be tsa2&3, in that order.  However, it would be more accurate to name it tla3.  This is where J&K come into the picture.  As I have previously mentioned, tla3 is a cover operation, unbeknownst to both j and k, (as was tsa1), but not entirely unbeknownst to the church.  This is what I hear from a sometimes unreliable source.  Seeing is believing, as we say in the disclosure world.  I’m not sure what tsa2 is supposed to be.  tsa2 and tla3 might be the same, for all I know.  Grant may be better informed on this matter.  


    Tonight, there will be a three hour Rabbit Hole meeting, with host Grant Cameron, 8-11pm/EDT..... https://zoom.us/j/387693722 . I plan to be there.  


    The roll out for tla3 was in Colorado.  I did not attend.  Neither did J or K.  I have received no further information about it.  OM is to be the site for the next phase.  Some links are to be offered, but they are not available, as yet.  The overriding issue is between the physical and the metaphysical aspects of the rattling cage and any associated phenomena, ie, to what degree is this a portal phenomenon?


    11:50.........

    Sign,

    I see that you had a question for me, as to the source of the BPWH........

    The source is just my own imagination.  I have never claimed otherwise.   I have never claimed to be a channel or contactee of any sort.  I have only claimed to be an ‘expert’, ie. a former drip under pressure.  

    I pursue truth in the only way I know how, ie. logically.  

    Science claims to have a hegemony on truth.  I dispute that claim.  

    I even dispute their claim to a hegemony on empirical truth.  

    The only claim that I might vouchsafe to science is their claim to analytic truth, which I see as an empty claim, since they have no analysand, if I have stated that properly.  


    The analysand of personalism is persons, as the analysand of atomism is atoms.  

    Persons are the only things in themselves, to paraphrase Kant. All else is derivative therefrom.  

    Deists and pantheists, among others, disagree.  

    Persons, unlike atoms, do not, cannot, just swerve in the void.  

    Persons can hardly exist apart from other persons.  

    We are social beings.  There is a hard to define milieu of persons.  The best existing theory of this milieu is provided by panentheism.  

    Unless you are an atomist, the only other alternative is pantheism.  Pantheism has no explanatory power.  It can only accept what is.  

    Panentheism provides a transcendental dimension.  It provides a vantage from which to critique the world.  It provides a vantage from which to postulate the BPWH.  That is what I have done.  No more.... no less.  


    1........

    However, if this is, indeed, the BPWH, then all critique is futile.  

    A paradox.  

    Yes, but it is a paradox we can live with.  It is a paradox that most of us agree to take upon ourselves..... and share.  

    We find freedom in our imagination and poetry, and in imagining God’s Kingdom on Earth.  

    Yes, many have tried to storm the gates of that heaven.  

    But when we finally get to that Gate, we turn around and realize that our sojourn to that point was, at least, half the fun.  Enjoy.......

    smelly has crossed that Jordan.  He curses me for not taking the plunge....... so does the Princess.  Don’t worry about me, I’m just admiring the view.  I have seen life from both sides, now.  

    Fear not.  Disclosure is at hand.  It may not be quite what we expected, but it will suffice unto the day.  


    You may not treasure your innocence.  Allow me to, vicariously.  This is our childhood’s end, children.... suffer the children to come unto me.  

    smelly calls us muppets, derogatorily.  There is no derogation in God’s Kingdom.... not even for smelly.  

    I have spoken of our very worst fear.  This is the chyu situation.  I told the Princess that our biggest problem was that we have no problems.  

    She looked me in the eye.  I blinked.  

    We cannot blink.  

    Yes, some were chosen.  Even I was chosen.  Now, all are chosen.  If I have any message, that is my only one.  

    Yes, we do circle back to tribalism.  That is from whence we came.

    The very last tribalism, on this side, is to be witnessed on the hills of Judaea.  

    Come down, out of the hills.  We goyim do not have cooties.  

    Is there an or else?  Yes.  Ask Harvey.  

    All that’s left is........ me, too......


    (cont......)
    avatar
    hobbit
    Member of Distinction
    Member of Distinction


    Posts : 1601
    Join date : 2017-08-04

    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Re: Three in One

    Post by hobbit Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:09 am

    cwallatruth wrote:does this location mean anything to anyone?

    Ackling Dyke, Nr Sixpenny Handley, Dorset
    http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2018/acklingdyke/acklingdyke2018a.html
    hobbit






    avatar
    cwallatruth
    Senior Member
    Senior Member


    Posts : 287
    Join date : 2018-08-09

    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Re: Three in One

    Post by cwallatruth Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:48 am

    hobbit wrote:
    cwallatruth wrote:does this location mean anything to anyone?

    Ackling Dyke, Nr Sixpenny Handley, Dorset
    http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2018/acklingdyke/acklingdyke2018a.html
    hobbit

    Ha, yes that's actually why I was asking. I was originally looking for some meaning around Crowley's unicursal hexagram, came across a crop circle that had that symbol, and in searching the area of that crop circle, I saw the crop circle you posted on the satellite image, and then came here to out of curiosity if this area had any other connections to anyone.
    avatar
    hobbit
    Member of Distinction
    Member of Distinction


    Posts : 1601
    Join date : 2017-08-04

    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Re: Three in One

    Post by hobbit Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:09 pm

    cwallatruth wrote:
    hobbit wrote:
    cwallatruth wrote:does this location mean anything to anyone?

    Ackling Dyke, Nr Sixpenny Handley, Dorset
    http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2018/acklingdyke/acklingdyke2018a.html
    hobbit

    Ha, yes that's actually why I was asking.  I was originally looking for some meaning around Crowley's unicursal hexagram, came across a crop circle that had that symbol, and in searching the area of that crop circle, I saw the crop circle you posted on the satellite image, and then came here to out of curiosity if this area had any other connections to anyone.

    I spent many years checking out crop circles, even caught some making some.
    but I have an advantage.
    I can check the matrix relative to the crop circle.


    Each crop has it's own unique memory field, and when they are planted so close together they form a resistance to the natural implosion and outrush of consciousness, then the tractor lines create free from resistance channels, plasma(consciousness) thus overloads and causes the crops to distort at the nodal points at ninety degrees.


    You are not seeing a six pointed hexagram there.



    hobbit
    RunningBull
    RunningBull
    Full Member
    Full Member


    Posts : 81
    Join date : 2018-12-11
    Age : 35

    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Re: Three in One

    Post by RunningBull Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:58 pm

    @hobbit: What do you think is the purpose for crop circles?

    Sponsored content


    Three in One - Page 12 Empty Re: Three in One

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:18 pm