Here we have a slightly new departure, inspired by desert dweller.
Let’s see what happens. Hopefully, we’ll come up with a better title.
This is a slight detour from the Great Distraction in the Sky.
Yes, I have claimed to be a monist, but it seems that you can’t be a monist and Personalist at the same time. More technically, we’re talking three persons in one substance.
There is to be a strong emphasis on history, as inspired by Joachim da Fiore, where Disclosure leads us into the age of the Spirit.
Folks who don’t buy into this Metanarrative are welcome to argue against it, but they are not welcome to be continually advocating some alternative or for nothing.
Personalism is the name of this Game.
All other gamers are invited to state their games, but game elsewhere. Thanks for the understanding.
I hope that this will reduce the confusion in these parts.
And I do hope and trust to have the continued understanding of Cyrellys. If an open mind is not to lead to nihilism, we must respect the personal nature of mind and of mind’s ‘objects’.
There are several artifacts that need pointing out...... specific links will be given later.......
The earlier blogs and websites.
The abortive BPWiki..... it should be resurrected, in due course.
KWF and the Chronicles
There are various YouTube channels, which might be pointed to.
We must respect other persons, at all times.
We must respect others’ opinion, as long as those opinions may be cogently argued, and that includes arguing that said opinions deserve the label of being a better BPWH. And, by the way, that mnemonic is for best possible world hypothesis.
Hang in there, please.
Let me say, however, that there is no outside. smelly is as near to the outside as you are liable to see in this world. The outside is parasitic upon the inside, as you may see, pretty clearly in this case.
What we so faciley refer to as the ‘objective’ is actually the intersubjective. That is the sense in which I am a monist. The Monad is the One substance in which all persons reside. All persons are equal, but, historically, three persons stand out. In the patriarchal nomenclature of the historian, Joachim da Fiore, we have the age of the father, the age of the son, and the age of the spirit, aka the Aquarian age.
To inaugurate the Aquarian age, we have TSA, which was just to provide an excuse for the grey lady to clamber aboard. Following that will be tsa2&3, in that order. However, it would be more accurate to name it tla3. This is where J&K come into the picture. As I have previously mentioned, tla3 is a cover operation, unbeknownst to both j and k, (as was tsa1), but not entirely unbeknownst to the church. This is what I hear from a sometimes unreliable source. Seeing is believing, as we say in the disclosure world. I’m not sure what tsa2 is supposed to be. tsa2 and tla3 might be the same, for all I know. Grant may be better informed on this matter.
Tonight, there will be a three hour Rabbit Hole meeting, with host Grant Cameron, 8-11pm/EDT..... https://zoom.us/j/387693722 . I plan to be there.
The roll out for tla3 was in Colorado. I did not attend. Neither did J or K. I have received no further information about it. OM is to be the site for the next phase. Some links are to be offered, but they are not available, as yet. The overriding issue is between the physical and the metaphysical aspects of the rattling cage and any associated phenomena, ie, to what degree is this a portal phenomenon?
I see that you had a question for me, as to the source of the BPWH........
The source is just my own imagination. I have never claimed otherwise. I have never claimed to be a channel or contactee of any sort. I have only claimed to be an ‘expert’, ie. a former drip under pressure.
I pursue truth in the only way I know how, ie. logically.
Science claims to have a hegemony on truth. I dispute that claim.
I even dispute their claim to a hegemony on empirical truth.
The only claim that I might vouchsafe to science is their claim to analytic truth, which I see as an empty claim, since they have no analysand, if I have stated that properly.
The analysand of personalism is persons, as the analysand of atomism is atoms.
Persons are the only things in themselves, to paraphrase Kant. All else is derivative therefrom.
Deists and pantheists, among others, disagree.
Persons, unlike atoms, do not, cannot, just swerve in the void.
Persons can hardly exist apart from other persons.
We are social beings. There is a hard to define milieu of persons. The best existing theory of this milieu is provided by panentheism.
Unless you are an atomist, the only other alternative is pantheism. Pantheism has no explanatory power. It can only accept what is.
Panentheism provides a transcendental dimension. It provides a vantage from which to critique the world. It provides a vantage from which to postulate the BPWH. That is what I have done. No more.... no less.
However, if this is, indeed, the BPWH, then all critique is futile.
Yes, but it is a paradox we can live with. It is a paradox that most of us agree to take upon ourselves..... and share.
We find freedom in our imagination and poetry, and in imagining God’s Kingdom on Earth.
Yes, many have tried to storm the gates of that heaven.
But when we finally get to that Gate, we turn around and realize that our sojourn to that point was, at least, half the fun. Enjoy.......
smelly has crossed that Jordan. He curses me for not taking the plunge....... so does the Princess. Don’t worry about me, I’m just admiring the view. I have seen life from both sides, now.
Fear not. Disclosure is at hand. It may not be quite what we expected, but it will suffice unto the day.
You may not treasure your innocence. Allow me to, vicariously. This is our childhood’s end, children.... suffer the children to come unto me.
smelly calls us muppets, derogatorily. There is no derogation in God’s Kingdom.... not even for smelly.
I have spoken of our very worst fear. This is the chyu situation. I told the Princess that our biggest problem was that we have no problems.
She looked me in the eye. I blinked.
We cannot blink.
Yes, some were chosen. Even I was chosen. Now, all are chosen. If I have any message, that is my only one.
Yes, we do circle back to tribalism. That is from whence we came.
The very last tribalism, on this side, is to be witnessed on the hills of Judaea.
Come down, out of the hills. We goyim do not have cooties.
Is there an or else? Yes. Ask Harvey.
All that’s left is........ me, too......