Ok, sports fans, what’s the biggest challenge for an immaterialist?
Is it explaining a thunderstorm
or explaining a sperm bank?
And which is harder to explain…… a sperm bank or a crypto bank….. using entanglement…….. or just using atoms
?
How much entanglement is there in crypto…….. with or without the atoms?
How much entanglement is there in an iPhone?
Is it easier to understand with or without atoms?
Would you like to explain the iPhone without the Logos?
Are we beginning to understand that there may be metaphysical similarities between the internet and the unconscious?
The data centers are in each of our heads….. but remember that our heads are illusory.
Where is the Akashic record?
Are we looking
at the Akashic record?
Ours is the best possible simulation.
But, wait, simulations have data banks.
So maybe the data is stored in the Agape record?
The seeds of which are planted in us……. all 10^10 of us.
By the way, fractals do have seeds.
The seed of the Mandelbrot is a single digit…… yes?
But do keep in mind that an immaterialist doesn’t believe in numbers, either.
Numbers are amongst the most entangled things we know.
That’s what mathematics is about……. Fermat understood that better than most……. 3,4,5.
By reading up on Fermat/Wiles, we might begin to understand how entanglement works.
It works on all levels, kinda like Pratityasamutpada!
And how does Praty work?
How does the iPhone work?
Do we have to understand how Fermat works to understand how Jobs works?
Maybe
so.
Did Steve understand that his redeemer lives?
I suspect……. better than most.
……….
Well, reading up on Lisa, Steve was a bit too smart to be a Jesus freak.
We’ll give him a pass……. like all the rest of us!
I’m not sure if Steve could have picked up on physics or the Quantum.
Look what happened to Billy G.
There was a pretty narrow slot……. around 1977.
Princess should know that better than most.
Did she not get the memo
?
It needs special delivery
.
……….
What was Fermat able to intuit about 3,4&5?
He knew they were special, but what was the metaphysics?
Was it connected to the Metanarrative?
Would Steve or Bill have cared?
Did it have anything to do with the Mandelbrot?
Could it have been unrelated to the trinity…….. alamagordo, calvary…… you name it!
But where were we?
It has to do with seeds and seminality.
I’d much rather have to explain the mind with the Logos than with atoms.
Well, I’m sure we could, but it might require a few extra detours.
Explain atoms with the mind…….. now we’re talkin’!
Once a few bars have been hummed, we’ll all be able to sing the tune.
That’s the beauty of holography.
That’s the beauty of the small world.
Hmmm
, should Pete’s last theorem have been the SWH?
Darn it…… the margin on this page
is just too darn small!
Uh, oh, I got Pete’s theorem wrong…….. it’s not about 3, it’s about 2….. forgive me, Lord!
Wikipedia just makes me much too lazy!
It was Sophie Germain who laid the groundwork for Wiles.
Let’s see if I got that right.
………
So, what is next?
Is there any good way to intuit the logical necessity of atoms, beyond metabolism?
Was Leucippus something more than an astute observer?
What was his metaphysics?
His atoms came in infinitely many shapes.
He was a big world atheist.
He could see no for a finite number of forms.
The one preserved fragment from Leucippus…… everything happens for a reason…….. Gottfried ran with that one.
In the same breath, he ruled out cosmic intelligence.
Leucci was basically telling the Eleatics to go suck……. on the void.
He was not about to get stuck with the One.
I agree that Parmenides is a bit hard to swallow…….. especially if you don’t appreciate Fermat……. there is only one number, and it’s not a number…….. three……. this is similar to the Jews holding up five a five fingered salute 🫡 at the Exodus.
I’m thinking that the gist here is that numbers are embedded in the Logos in a rather metaphysical manner.
It has something to do with the Myth of Invariance……. I’ll bet.
Has anything been missed?
……….
Since when did pure mathematics get to be personal?
Is mathematics not as pure, as Platonic, as it is usually laid out to be?
One might take a look at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intuitionism/#Phil for a more phenomenological view of mathematics.
Cantor is the bugbear of intuitionists.
His infinity of infinities has some intuitive appeal……… it is intriguing.
Are transfinite numbers pantheistic?
The politics surrounding Cantor’s work suggests that mathematics should be considered a work of art……. not something written in stone.
In contrast to the strictly personal, small world, I think of the transpersonal, interpersonal regime as being, necessarily, trans finite.
Yes, there is that of the cosmic/transcendental in every one of us.
Does this render God any less personal?
No, rather it renders love transcendental.
Note bene that although folks are necessarily finite quantitatively, we are necessarily infinite qualitatively……. especially interpersonally.
We are social beings at our cosmic core.
There is only one of us, after all…….. from the Source….. back to the Source!
Everything else is the best possible illusion.
And what about that Source?
We must keep in mind its co-dependency.
Isn’t 10^10 overdoing it?
Strictly speaking, yes, but…….
It’s a very big BUT when you take into account the whole shebang!
We are a work in progress, sub specie aeternitatis!
Isn’t that a contradiction in terms?
Of course, it is.
Peg it up to free will and agape.
(cont……..)
Yesterday at 1:22 pm by Big Bunny Love
» Why are we here?
Yesterday at 6:03 am by dan
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:34 pm by Mr. Janus
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:13 am by Mr. Janus
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:41 am by Mr. Janus
» CockaWHO!?
Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:41 pm by Mr. Janus
» Scientists plan DNA hunt for Loch Ness monster next month
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:32 am by Mr. Janus
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Sat Mar 16, 2024 12:01 am by Mr. Janus
» Earth Intelligence
Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:04 am by Mr. Janus