Hi ScarZ,
Thank you for posting this information. Does any of David Flynn's material give any idea to the time-frames for the early events or historical figures that his research indicated?
UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.
Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:29 pm by Admin
Cy wrote:Re: Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things - Cyrellys
Today at 11:42 am by Cyrellys (Online)
Well, during homeschool today I have been assaulted by teenage discoveries in "your mama" quips from the internet including ones like this:
Your mama is so fat, that when she went swimming out in the Pacific ocean a group of whales came swimming along singing we-are-family! even though you're bigger than me!!!
Your mama is so fat, that when she went swimming in the Atlantic ocean and Spain claimed her as a new world.
And then there were a series of similar ones that exceed re-publishing discretion and decency.
MEANWHILE
Putin is reported as slamming 'morally bankrupt America who is godless now'.
http://patdollard.com/2014/01/putin-slams-morally-bankrupt-america-whos-godless-now/
Whelp there is nothing sane nor sacred these days. Maybe.
But then Putin is still focused on the recent policy topic (01-14-14 ?):
“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a recent keynote speech. “Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”
Cy
-- Truth is stranger than fiction.
"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
ScaRZ wrote:
Always keep in mind,"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:" .........Here we see once again that the broad way (Most traveled or most popular way)........leads to destruction.
Bard wrote:
Where exactly is the narrow gate or for that matter - what does it look like? Some who walk alone in their quest towards God, are always being suggested to, that they are not on the narrow path. Who defines the narrow path? Men? Christians? Pastors? Who has the authority to claim they 'know' the narrow way or does God naturally have that function?
Does God speak to us all in the same manner? Are all our walks the same?
If perse one Billion Christians, profess to Christ and the Father in prayer, how many are on the narrow way? All? Some? Few? Is it all of them vs a world that does not?
What exactly is the 'most popular way'? How do you define this?
Should we return to the days of stoning as punishments for gathering sticks on Sabbath as Moses did - or did Christ bring us something more to consider – something far greater?
Questions, normally unacceptable within church walls, asked here, should naturally be asked.
ScaRZ wrote:
The words were from Jesus Christ. A great teaching from The Lord that I believe show those "Of The World" and those who are "Not Of The World". It's all about the childern of darkness......."Those of the night" and the childern of the light........"Those of the day".
As Jesus Christ said........"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."(Matthew 7:14) Jesus Christ is teaching using prophecy of how only a few will receive the gift of eternal life. Remember Jesus Christ is The Way..........."He is the Narrow". The vast majority take the "Broad" way that is not Jesus Christ and it leads away from eternal life and ends with destruction. The Adversary is the Broad......."The Destroyer".
I used the term "The Most Popular" because I believe it fits very well in our thinking of today. It is suited to the means of the majority or widely accepted.
Bard wrote:
So, only those who profess to be Christian, are on the Narrow way? All Christians despite the actions they take through life? Wearing one face - but presenting another? Are they also the narrow-walkers?ScaRZ wrote:
People can profess anything but does that make it so?......"No it doesn't". A person must truly be "In Jesus Christ". Lip service isn't worth much,it's about bearing good fruit. No Christian however is perfect,we do all fall short......"We do sin,we are hard headed,we don't listen,we act before we think,we rebel". Just like human parents needing to chastise their childern so to does The Father need to chastise his childern at times. Sometimes we stray and need only a good firm yank to get us back in line facing the right direction. Many times it takes more than a good firm yank.
Theologically speaking, we know that as long as you ask for forgiveness for that action, you will be absolved, but what if it is chronic? Two cheek limits?ScaRZ wrote:I believe anyone can stray too far and not care of returning too The Lord. I believe The Lord will never leave or foresake me but I believe I can leave and foresake him. I believe a Christian can "Fall Away". Apostasy isn't apostasy if one can not choose abandonment.
If a holy-man, peeks through your windows day/night, with a pseudo-omnipotence, technologically speaking, does this take them further or closer to the narrow-way?ScaRZ wrote:If he isn't genuine he is already far from The Narrow.
Did Jesus promote the practice of temple spies in the name of the Lord and or the Father? I honestly need to find an answer to that one question.ScaRZ wrote:Lay it out more clearly in words....."Explain in greater detail what you are referring to."
Bard wrote:Just curious if Jesus condoned, spoke about, or discussed spies.
How would he view them?
Bard wrote:Just curious if Jesus condoned, spoke about, or discussed spies.
How would he view them?
Bard wrote:
Do you feel men of God and or those that profess to be of the Lord - are sanctioned to pry into the private lives of anyone they chose - For whatever reason they deem appropriate?
Jake Reason wrote:Thanks Nib, you've convinced me. I've change my mind on investing the time to write about that complex subject here. Be mindful where one trusts the value of pearls hard found. Perhaps I'll save it for some other venue.
The up-side is that I have faced the reality of this forum.
Bard wrote:Jake Reason wrote:Thanks Nib, you've convinced me. I've change my mind on investing the time to write about that complex subject here. Be mindful where one trusts the value of pearls hard found. Perhaps I'll save it for some other venue.
The up-side is that I have faced the reality of this forum.
What is the reality, exactly?
"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Bard wrote:
I realize you enjoy your one liners, and that is fine, but is there more in you than that? Do you have a voice deeper than one liners? I'm certain Scarz does not need someone to pat him on the back or to agree with him when he 'lays it out'. Why don't you take some time to lay out your feelings and soul - like the many others here. You might actually find it - educational.
ScaRZ wrote:
This wasn't directed at me but I will give my opinion on the question.
I would say most people or nations that spy aren't of God or even profess to be of The Lord.
This world we live in isn't sugar and spice and everything nice. Sometimes spying is needed, but like anything else it can and is misused.
Instead of a beast that is kept under control,it can rather become a beast that controls.
Nib wrote:
Here is the thing to get straight- I only come here to see what ScaRZ is interested in. I don't come here for your non stop ? mark ? mark ? mark.
"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Cy wrote:Re: Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things - Cyrellys
Post on Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:55 pm by Cyrellys (Online)
For anyone who missed it, John B Wells was fired from C2C. David Hodges does quite the dress down of C2C here: http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/02/06/john-b-wells-fired-for-being-too-popular-and-truthful-an-exclusive-interview/
Wells is starting his own show. Caravan to Midnight.
I missed it since I haven't been a listener since Bell sold out to the corporatist Premier/aka Clear Channel. The few shows I'd listened to were exactly as David describes. It was like C2C had been neutered. I'd heard good things about Wells and have seen him interviewed in a few places which was interesting but I never got around to returning to C2C myself.
Cy - Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things wrote: Year 314 Council of Arles - ties to today's situation
Re: Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things - Cyrellys
Post on Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:04 am by Cyrellys (Online)
A book I would like to lay hands on and read: Ever Ancient Ever New - Celtic Spirituality in the 20th Century by Delores T Whelan
and more on Pelagius and Pelagianism
particularly as pertains to comparison with Deism and concepts employed by the Founders & the Old Irish side of the concept of the Third Option
http://www.seanmultimedia.com/Pie_Pelagius_Letters.html
"Let them also read my recent little treatise which we were obliged to publish a short while ago in defense of free will,
and let them acknowledge how unfair is their determination to disparage us for a denial of grace, when we throughout
almost the whole work acknowledge fully and sincerely both free will and grace." ~ Pelagius
I've been looking at the roots of the ideas that formed the Third Option in its many facets. I traced some of those ideas back to several sets
There were in the early broadcasts of these ideas several groups of people whose experiences went into them:
The Ascetic Tradition with the Ionians, Cistercian, and Ceile De groups who mixed to varying degrees] with the living tradition the druidic led older culture. Ideas from these groups can be found in both the Laconian contribution and the Mason/Templar. (Third Option)
Well, looking over these groups brought up a discovery of an accusation made in 314 at the Council of Arles which showed something peculiar in the beliefs of monastic leaders of the Isles.
That at least some of those (representatives) from the Isles present (at the meeting) may have been open practitioners of Pelagian concepts which focused on the concept of Free Will existing and working in tandem with Grace. Something we see in the beliefs of several of the Founders and in the principles that are part of the operation of the Third Option.
(Addendum: In the roots of both Laconian /Old Irish circa 1623 to present/, and /Masonic/Templar tradition circa 1724 - 1800/, the term 'Grace' has an additional connotation: "Fall from Grace" includes the dual meaning of specifically the collapse of the last technological high civilization on Earth which was space travel capable & integrated in the Greater Community to some degree - this extraneous connotation is part of the 'tiered style' /modern term/ of thinking communicating from that time period where terms often held two or more referential meanings that added depth and breadth to their dialogs and efforts, and which sometimes adds confusion to accounts.)
Not being what anyone could call well read in biblical or doctrinal arguments, I stumbled across this one completely by accident, following synchronistic bread crumbs of recreational inquiry. The short description is that I had a 'wow' moment as I looked at an accusation attributed to Germanus of Auxarre leveled at the british contingent attending the event.
"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
OMF Logo Background by:
by George Grie
The Ghost Ship Series
The lost expedition
pinterest.com
Forum Design
By Cyrellys Geibhendach
Yesterday at 10:08 pm by U
» Why are we here?
Yesterday at 8:31 pm by Post Eschaton Punk
» The scariest character in all fiction
Yesterday at 6:47 pm by U
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:16 am by U
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U
» Livin Your Best Life
Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:19 am by U
» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan