smelly boy, I dare you to try to put the Princess in a can.
She will sting your smelly hide real good. Ackbar was trying to tell you something. You forgot to listen. And you’d better be real nice to Marissa, too.
And when you get all that bees wax out of your ears, you might want to listen to what I’m actually saying, instead of projecting all your paranoia onto chicken little.
When the sky does fall, my team will be there to catch it....... captain, my captain. This is way beyond your imagination, smelly. And, frankly, it is above your pay grade.
You still have no clue about personalism, even when you’re giving it lip service.
If you care to understand us, persons, you could do a lot worse than starting out with Jesus.
If you think you know yourself, and you don’t know Jesus, you’ve got another think coming, Eric. I think Marissa will agree.
(cont......)
Last edited by dan on Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
From the Barfield paper, I had a synchronicity, the wind.
For I am a poet possessed myself by the Daemon without and within and I know exactly what this passage hints at.
My genius is from the Daemon/Daimon.
Idiot muppets don't know at all what that means, but I'm here for you.
I also have been writing of the wind blowing through all this and when I write the word wind, there are many images that pop up and bring a feeling.
"It is not accidental, then, that whereas the ancient world thinks of the poet as “inspired,” the modern world thinks of the same poet as “imaginative”; the first is to be “possessed by” a genius or daemon without; the second (as Coleridgean poetics would propose) is rather to be “in possession of” the daemon within. Hence the relation, historically speaking, between “inspiration” and “imagination” is that of a true polarity or “seminal identity.”
So let's consider Coleridge's "seminal identity."
"In him was life, and that life was the light of men."
"--in ipso vita erat, et vita erat lux hominum. As the Cambridge Platonists said, Reason is the candle of the Lord, our participation in the Word; and the Word, as Barfield has said, is the cosmic process on its way from original (unconscious) to final (conscious) participation in God. The religious position, again, is not a new one--in fact, it may well be the oldest Christian one--but the point is that Barfield has arrived at it by romantic means and that he defends it by romantic means, the doctrine of the creative imagination."
How is your imaginative instrument these days Dan?
I think atrophied.
Perhaps you should let the wind fill your sails again then.
Here is some wind for you.
I much prefer the romantics to the boring myopic Jesus freaks.
I used to be one, so I know a little bit about it.
"The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit."
Open Minds Forum v.2 2012 - Current. OMF continues its work on the topics of UFOs, Exopolitics, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Ancient History, Exotic/Cutting-edge Technologies, Cryptozoology, Special Cases, Associated Theories & Philosophies, Whistleblowers, and Sanctioned Communications.
Social bookmarking
Bookmark and share the address of Open Minds Forum on your social bookmarking website
Today at 8:28 am by dan
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Yesterday at 11:11 pm by Mr. Janus
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Yesterday at 11:01 pm by Mr. Janus
» Livin Your Best Life
Yesterday at 10:45 pm by Mr. Janus
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:13 am by Mr. Janus
» CockaWHO!?
Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:41 pm by Mr. Janus
» Scientists plan DNA hunt for Loch Ness monster next month
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:32 am by Mr. Janus
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Sat Mar 16, 2024 12:01 am by Mr. Janus
» Earth Intelligence
Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:04 am by Mr. Janus