Persons within the substance of love.

99 wrote:

PF wrote:This is why we see no evidence of ET.

They can and have manifested photographically for us but it's your choice to ignore such evidential material because whatever doesn't fit into your existing paradigm you'll say it's fake. Those who have such material like that, me included, have had to develop a thick skin and accept that many out there will scream HOAX! when evidence like that emerges. It's hard not to take such accusations personally but, in my case, reactions like that only strengthen my resolve to make it known to all that can show up in our photographs and videos and I do that anonymously as ego doesn't even fit into that equation.... only the truth.  

Dan wrote:With the ETH v the UTH, it’s really just apples and oranges. Here we do oranges. We should even have a third thread just for debating ETH v UTH.

dan wrote:Please understand, 99, that I’m not about to pussyfoot around this issue.

PF is even less informed that you are, on this issue [...]

(cont.......)

dan wrote: 

But PF has not been around here as long as you have.  He barely had a clue.  

(cont.......)

Dan wrote:How Many Worlds?

This is closely related to the last question. The answer is similar. There is no law against the creation of many worlds; however, there are some very reasonable stipulations.

Unless we are dealing with an evil creator, the welfare of the creatures is the prime concern. Thus there would be a concentration of creative effort on the quality of some primary world. Any other creations would be secondary, and presumably would be subservient to the main one.

But what if something went wrong with the primary creation? Well, that question arises only from the parochial, creaturely perspective embedded in time. Any real creation is going to be primarily teleological, or created backward in time from our perspective. We have our own mistakes to worry about, not God's.

As you see then, we have come full circle, back to our starting point which was just the best of all possible worlds. If this is somebody's show, I think we can be reasonably confident that it is the main show, it is the big-top, just about the only show in town.

And what about the starry sky? Well, it serves many purposes in this creation, especially as a very aesthetically, natural backdrop. Even Lucas would be proud. Aren't there other civilizations out there. I am suggesting there is no there, there. Whatever visitors we may have are of the interdimensional variety, not interstellar.

Now begins the apologetics or rationalization. If all is well that ends well, then clearly we have our work cut out for us, but whoever said that the best of all worlds would be boring?

dan wrote:PF,

All I’m asking of folks here is to exercise some cockpit awareness....... understand what sort of terrain you are flying over.

Dan wrote:He was trying to protect you from my chicken little insanity

Dan wrote:All of that is what may be transpiring in the next few days in Utah and Mexico....... god willing...... well, ok, wcm, also.

The Princess?
She arrived via a pod that landed in Kashmir.
She was adopted by a diplomat from that country.
She met Ron, as a child, at the White House.
She has wisdom beyond her years
She's very pretty and has a nice personality but she also has a little bit of a temper too.
She has crossed into other dimensions via portals
And she's your friend.
She's married to Ron.
She has a pretty and intelligent little girl
and doesn't put up with your s#%T a lot of times
So you have to behave yourself when you're around her.
In another realm.... she's an unknown beast of some sort.
She also wears very nice and expensive jewelry.
I strongly suspect that the Princess is very psychic or at least very intuitive.