If you can grasp something..... anything, it must be minimally coherent. There can be no correspondence, if two things don’t correspond.
I’m going after maximal coherence...... which, yes, wk, would be a cosmic agape.
Let’s get back to R,A&D.......
I’m just saying this would be one way to setup a WoM/MoAPS. Would it be the best possible way?
You would basically be bringing three necessary elements together, in a rather personal context......
You have the phenomenal, the political and the conceptual elements, as represented by three persons. These would be the basic ingredients. It would be a minimal launching pad for a word of mouth process. The Lakeside protocols would provide a more public component.
The TTSA initiative is certainly another option, and it has similar components, some of which almost certainly overlap with this initiative. What is lacking is any appeal to coherence. There are many fragments already in the public domain.
It does appear that there has been a built in delay. No point in simply putting out more fragments, without being able to put them together, and provide an historical context.
Any eschatological implications would go a long way toward explaining and justifying the convolutions of the secrecy and false starts. Also, such enormous implications would provide a rationale for a near universal self censorship.
Piecemeal disclosure was only going to foment confusion. Almost by definition, Disclosure has to be a package deal. The package must be comprehensive, coherent and personal, and must be embedded in some existing structure. A mere mouthpiece would not fit the personal aspect.
I also think it is easy enough to understand how a portal phenomenon would be more amenable to a spiritual aspect, than, say, a flying saucer, and certainly more personal.
What is happening at the Lake may be some combination of the two phenomena.
The mere existence of coherence, implies an inner dimension to knowledge, a tacit dimension to knowing, an implicate order. There must be something already present, some sort of seed knowledge. Thus do we have a universal intuition of a microcosm...... a soul, if you will.
A reductionist would claim this ‘seed’ to be merely our genetic endowment, the prewiring of our brains. I would suggest it has more to do with the necessary unity of consciousness..... how many orders removed from any wiring?
Last edited by dan on Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:24 pm; edited 6 times in total