Scientific materialism is like a balloon...... one prick and it's all gone. Hey, do I look like a prick? Nah, not me, stealer of dinghies.
We have the big Four...... vitalism, intentionality, holism and teleology. The scientists and philosophers should be arguing about these principals, but, no, the important questions have been sidelined by the vehemence of the fundamentalists on both sides, biological and theological. Both sides are covering their deplorable ignorance of the finer points, with their shouting to the bleachers, about designs and designers.
But, trust me, it's all part of the 'design'.......
I do speak of a 'plan' of salvation, but, no, there really is no 'plan'. Hey, is this any way to run a cosmos?
But there is something..........
There is a chreode of salvation. A what......?
Waddington also spoke of an 'epigenetic' landscape. The creodes are like 'gullies' in that developmental landscape. There is a salvational landscape, and we are about to fall into that 'ditch', headfirst. This 'ditch' is our CTC. Was the CTC designed? Shouldn't we be worshiping the Designer? Well...... let's be cautious with our 'worship'.
Needless to say, we're speaking of a 4-d landscape, especially when it comes to history. From whence came space and time, we might wonder?
Let's go back yesterday's post, which was even more 'succinct' than I'm wont to be........
We were wondering about some minimal creation......
We started with an atom, and then jumped to an observer. That's one big leap. Where are we putting this atom? Don't we need a container of some sort? Newton posited an absolute space-time, and we're still struggling to get over that absolutism. Even Hegel struggled with the Absolute Spirit. Relativity came as a shock, but, if truth be known, it barely dented the walls of our self-imposed cave.
The observer problem might have removed the walls, but it didn't. Wheeler was onto something when he spoke of a 'participatory' universe. He saw into the abyss, and stepped back, with an abundance of caution. Me.... stealer of dinghies.....? I jumped in headfirst.
Well, if truth be known, it took me five years to get up the nerve to jump, and, even then, I had to be pushed. I was pushed by Kit Williams' Masquerade (1981), q.v. the images. I was smitten. Every natural object had a meaning, a potential purpose. It was pronoia at its best.
10:25-----------
But I would never have dared jump, if I didn't have a skyhook. Need I be more specific? It was a package deal. The Eschaton came gift-wrapped. It was wrapped in the MoAPS.
Here I am, 35 years later, and about to embark on the CtN, and the Ruskies are still playing russian-roulette with their nukeskies. Not that we are paragons of virtue when it comes to being MAD.
11am--------
Ooops..... I must've pushed the wrong button, or something........ the last 30' just got wiped......
It was sort of important, but my brain must have been wiped too.
Now, my memory is coming back........
I was talking about the very major distinction between sentience and sapience, when it comes to John W's participatory universe.
With our special sapience we are able to wrap our heads, individually and communally, around Creation. Is that because we have big heads? No. It's because we are time-sharing on the cosmic Soul, right along with God.
We truly are co-Creators, and we're just about to realize it, for the first time. In the next few months, it appears that we'll be getting a preview of Apocatastasis/Atonement. The main show is not slated for another thousand years, give or take...... That will be the Big R.......
What about all those folks who were expecting a joy ride to the stars? Won't they be disappointed? There are still places, like Serpo and Jurassic 'Parc', out in dimension-X. They're just not where the real action is.
The Telos does not mix with deep space and deep time. Too bad for deep space and deep time. The SciFi writers will have to make do with Fantasy, as if they weren't, already.
The Telos is anthropocentric, geocentric, etc....... Get used to it. Get over it. Nothing else makes a lick of sense. Think about it. Yes, it took me five years to take that leap. But come on in..... the water's great!
11:45-----------
The big R.......? Rapture, that is...... in another 1K years, or so.
I admit, I've lost more than a little sleep over this one. I'm looking for maximum continuity in a somewhat discontinuous situation, and that might be an understatement.
Maybe we should dwell on this a bit. You get to see how our cosmic factory might be working, or not.......
The basic continuity is the CTC, itself. You know, the ouroboros, with the serpent swallowing its tail. That is sort of continuous. But, yes, we have a slight resest problem. I mean, we will have left a rather large footprint.
Think of an electric or magnetic circuit, where, more likely that not, we'll encounter a spark-gap or air-gap, of some kind.
But why should we concern ourselves with a closed timelike curve (CTC), in the first place?
12:30----------
It was so long ago....... I'm trying to remember the origin of the Ouroboros.......
Even before the BPWH, there was a cosmic loop with mini-creations hanging off of it, as loops on the larger loop. The diagram still exists..... I was going to provide the link, but now the server farm is reporting an overload of some kind...... too much x-mas shopping, I suppose.
I knew that, with created/virtual space-time regime, we had gone beyond absolute time, so that the logical next step beyond beyond linear time would be circular time. It was about '91 when I inaugurated my BPW website. I kept the main circuit, and eliminated most of the sub-loops. It was since I started blogging on OMF, in 2006, that I realized that the CTC would provide some traction with modern physics, but it was only ever meant as a metaphorical construct, so far as I can tell.
So, there we are..... the BPW on a loop, with a virtual gap, or necessary reset, to account for the unidirectional flow of entropy, to make it sound more technical that it actually is.
(Now my relatively new Ipad is becoming unstable. I lost a couple of paragraphs, that time......)
1:45----------
I was explaining about the primordial/proto- cosmic Self, finding itself in the midst of an epigenetic landscape.
But almost before that point, this Self tends to bifurcate. Spontaneously, it experiences MPD. It's lonely at the top.
Why could there not be more than one of these primordial selves, from the get-go? There is no space to separate them. There is a 'landscape'.
The point of the proto-Self is that it makes no sense to speak of what is unobservable.
Mutiple selves might emerge, observing each other, or that proto-self would breakdown (MPD). I'm not sure that there would be an observable difference. We have the identity of indiscernibles (PII). We keep coming back to Leibniz. I think, now, I belabor the point.
Let me cut to the chase.........
There is a 'wandering' of these multiple selves. In the midst of this wandering, there is a mutually designated home self/territory. It becomes a game to see how 'far' one can wander, and still make it back. It's a risky game, perhaps. There is safety in numbers. Almost by definition, home is their center of 'gravity'.
'Early' in this process there would likely emerge a protocol governing the MPD. It would be the prototype of biological reproduction.
At about this point in this emerging logic, the Leibnizian notion of a BPW emerges. Embedded in its logic is the implicit challenge..... how far can we wander, and still make it back? And recall the safety in numbers.
Out of these basic constraints emerged the BPW. I come back to it, with my chicken-little BPWH. Yes, I chickened out. Many others wanted to wander further afield. Me? I miss my mommy! And besides, I'm not sure that MAD is just a joke.
As they say, if you like to eat sausage, maybe it's best to not visit the sausage factory........!
2:50------------
Significant parts of this vision have been around since the beginning.....
A basic idea of patheism is 'maya', wherein the world is an illusory construct. In many views, the world is the sum-total of our collective karma. With Leibniz, I am putting this construct into the best possible light. With Zoroaster, and others, I'm including a cosmic resolution, the Eschaton. Hey, there's nothing new under the sun. Am I bringing coals to Newcastle? Perhaps, but I may have a significant portion of the IC on my side. Shades of the A/C? Whatever.........
(cont.)
Yesterday at 10:08 pm by U
» Why are we here?
Yesterday at 8:31 pm by Post Eschaton Punk
» The scariest character in all fiction
Yesterday at 6:47 pm by U
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:16 am by U
» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U
» Livin Your Best Life
Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:19 am by U
» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan