Date: May 23, 2015 at 11:24:21 AM EDT
Cc: Princess Aliyah, Ron
Subject: RE: Request for a meeting
I'll pass this on to [J] and he'll get back to you if he has an interest.
As for myself and [the Foundation], there isn't the bandwidth to expand into these areas.
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:03 AM
Cc: Princess Aliyah; Ron
Subject: Request for a meeting
We would like to meet with you to discuss some potentially urgent matters that could be of particular relevance to both you and [JW].
If you will be available to meet with one or more of us within the next couple of weeks, Ron, Aliyah and I would then discuss in more detail, amongst ourselves, items that could be covered, and which could be conveyed to you, and through you to [J], in making the final arrangements for our meeting with you.
As I presently understand it, Ron and [J] have collaborated on a project connected with [aero-space firm] that involved exotic propulsion. I am not familiar with that project, but in my 23 year acquaintance with Ron, and more recently with his wife, Aliyah, founder of the Kashmir World Foundation, we have discussed some possibly related matters that may also need to be conveyed to the public in a timely fashion, that is within the next several months. The time constraint has do with potential downside risks on the domestic and international fronts, another topic which has only recently come to my attention.
The further understanding here is that [J] may be especially well situated to oversee the communication of certain of this information to the public. The developing domestic political scene, particularly amongst the various presidential candidates, may present both opportunities and risks, in this regard.
Ron will, of course, feel free to amend any of my above statements, and you may wish to speak directly with him.
This is not auspicious for our getting through to JW, despite CM having been on the Sarfatti list, along with Ron, for a couple of years. This 'bandwidth' problem seems emblematic of the bureaucratic/political response to dealing with the largest issues. The public claims to want disclosure, but only in dribs and drabs. They do not want the full frontal exposure. I can't really blame them in this regard, it is just human nature to not stray beyond our comfort zones..... our normal 'bandwidth'.
Yes, I do apologize for making you repeat yourself, all too often, but I'm not the only one being enlightened by you here, now am I?
And, now I see more clearly the nub of what may be our greatest misunderstanding.....
This concerns the nature of time. You understand that consciousness and the flow of time that is concomittant with it, has, from the beginning of recorded thought, been the greatest puzzle facing us.
What is clear, though, is that most of those who believe in a Source believe that the Source resides beyond space and time.
But, more than that, Cy, they believe that our percieved spatial-temporal order is the essential component of Creation.
I agree, but you seem not to........
So, yes, although we perceive ourselves to be the slaves of time, most of us understand that the Source is the maker and master of time.
This is just one aspect of Source's omniscience...... Source can see through and around time. Source is our Alpha AND Omega! Time is no obstacle to the Source.
For instance, you say.......
There is something humanity of Earth needs to get through their freakin' thick skulls...that is, they are NOT the only children of the Source out there, and, if the kids here suicide, well the Source will mark this version as a total failure and go back to the drawing board.
Cy, this is a very modern revision of the theistic tradition. And it is a view that is held by most ufologists.
In this post-Copernican space-age, we see ourselves not as the children of God, but, rather, as God's spawn. Yes, we are redundant and, therefore, we are Expendable, en masse, in toto.
In supposing that the Source will just sigh, and 'go back to the drawing board', we are reducing the Source to our own level of ignorance.
Imagine the bridge-builder who starts constructing a bridge at just one end, and is really not sure where he's going to put the other end. This is not bridge-building, and this is not Creation, either!
The Earth is not some cosmic lab experiment. We are not lab rats, despite how we may sometimes treat each other.
But I understand, Cy, that the Source is actually playing hide and seek with us. It is a serious game, and sometimes it appears that everything is at stake...... yes, very high stakes!
The Source is the source of Nature, and how easy it is for her to hide behind her own Creation. How easily we succumb to her artistry. This, of course, was part of the plan. Living in Plato's cave we grow accustomed to seeing just the shadows on the wall. How cozy we are in our little abode.
Free will, you say. We chalk every evil up to free will, including the ultimate evil of Planet-cide. Where is the hidden-hand? Where is the beneficient omniscience? Is the Source not the cosmic alchemist, transforming human evil into cosmic Good? Oh, we of scant faith!
Justice is blind? No, justice is mine, sayeth the Source.
There is in the world great confusion about the nature of the Source and our relation to it and to each other. The atheists may very easily point to sectarian strife as a predominant evil, but they do so while slitting their own throats with abandon.
How can we blame ignorance on humanity, when the chief architect of our ignorance is the artful self-concealment of our Source? Blessed ignorance. Holy ignorance. We are her clowns and she loves us for it, but all good things must end, and so must our naivete, alas. The mice will play while the cat's away. Now she's coming back.
Is she p*ssed? No. She probably feels like a party-pooper. That's all.