by dan Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:03 am
Eric,
It sounds like you're on the right track. I would stick to it. I'm not a practitioner or experiencer of any kind. I focus on skull work, seeing metaphysics as an extension of physics.
PF,
Suit yourself.
I doubt that you have a clue w.r.t. the BPWH. In order to have a clue, you would need to refer back to the mnemonics that are on the pages c. 18 of the previous thread. It does get rather dense. It is a struggle to extricate yourself from the modern paradigm, especially for anyone with more than a casual acquaintance with science.
OTOH, it is well worth the struggle. Without that struggle you will not be able to fully grasp either paradigm. The resulting ambiguities may lead you into endless confusion, as you attempt to struggle, blindly, from one paradigm to the other. That's pretty much where Eric is, but then he seems to have a pretty good handle on the phenomenology. That would leave you at a double disadvantage..... just saying.
I'm not aware of anyone who does have such a handle..... certainly not Ron or Aliyah. They are more like Eric. They may even be more advanced, in that regard. Eric fails to understand that we have a fairly specific mission, here. We are in a rather delicate place, not unlike a molting crustacean, or a butterfly about to leave its cocoon. There be predators in these waters. Yes, Donald is one of the potential predators, and even unaware. Hillary..... is a bit more tame, hopefully. Likely more aware. She can focus. She has been on the briefing scene for longer. But R&A don't like her either. They won't explain.
With somebody with media savvy, on the outside, we have a better chance to regularize this Diclosure process, even if that one be Trump. If not.... well, wish us luck, regardless.
What might work is a series of interviews with philosopers and physicists, wherein the interviewer would proactively engage her subjects, on the topic of immaterialism. The series would be commissioned with a high level of network support. Folks would gather that something was afoot, and pay attention. Rumors would circulate that this was a lead up to something. This process could be stretched out for about another year. Folks would have a better idea of what was at stake. This would be the final phase of the 70 year-long acclimation process. Could Donald possibly get behind such an effort? Otherwise, we'd have to grapple with an entire media bureaucracy.
That's my suggestion, anyway, on moving forward, with a modicum of caution. Anyone have a better idea?
There could be more background briefings, while the media process unfolded.... in conjunction with the media process.
Oh, yes, at some point we would begin to include theologians and spiritual types, in the interview process.
The title of the series would indicate that this was a focused attempt to move outside the box (of materialism). It would be a concerted exercise in 'what if....'.
12:15-------
It would probably be difficult to hide the fact that there was a specific worldview in mind. It would be very helpful to see other folks struggle to the same logical conclusion, but difficult to hide the fact that that the conclusion was already in the bag. But still, it might be worth the strain on credulity.
(cont.)
Yesterday at 8:15 pm by Mr. Janus
» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Yesterday at 8:09 pm by Mr. Janus
» Livin Your Best Life
Yesterday at 8:08 pm by Mr. Janus
» Why are we here?
Yesterday at 4:13 pm by dan
» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Yesterday at 1:37 am by Mr. Janus
» CockaWHO!?
Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:41 pm by Mr. Janus
» Scientists plan DNA hunt for Loch Ness monster next month
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:32 am by Mr. Janus
» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Sat Mar 16, 2024 12:01 am by Mr. Janus
» Earth Intelligence
Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:04 am by Mr. Janus