Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

"We're not meant to save the world.
We're meant to leave it." 
 -- INTERSTELLAR [November 2014]
< http://www.interstellarmovie.com/ >

From: Dan Smith
Date: June 21, 2014, 12:26:22 PM EDT
To: Ronald
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

There was that phone call to Aliyah, last weekend, calling for my continued patience, and tasking her to find the One.  

You said that you would check on the source of the call.  

Is that call the sole motivation for the Search Team?  


On Jun 21, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Ronald wrote:

Sir Anthony,

Glad to hear you will be joining the Search Team.

Princess Aliyah N. is not from the "frozen far north of India."  Her history is available from http://www.wolfspiritradio.com/joomla/index.php/hosts .  Keep in mind that she is a Warrior Princess, in constant battle against evil in many dimensions.

As member of the Search Team, please report any potential findings to Mr. Smith.  

And good luck!  

Ron


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike wrote:

Xtraordinary Men Int'l

Hi Ron, I thought you'd become a trappist monk after your mate, Gordon Novel, kicked the bucket. Well well well, if its not our very own CIA Dpty Director, Science & Tech Div, Ron Pandolfi, 56, in Great Falls, VA and his mysterious Princess who, as it turns out, is his new wife, Aliyah Pandolfi. Hey, congratulations, Ron!! O, and, by the way, folks, Aliyah is a Princess from good ole Kashmir up in the frozen far north of India while I'm here in the baking hot far south of India. Anyway, Ron, me ole buddy, you can count me in on your Princess's new project, but as it is we've been running our X-Men Int'l project for donkey's years - so maybe we should team up.
Yours in the battle for planet earth,

Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike (UK)
Cosmic Research Foundation
Markapur, A.P. 523316, India


From: Ron
To:  Anthony Pike
Subject: Extraordinary Beings
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:15:54 -0400

The Princess is sponsoring the Da Vinci Challenge to create a cadre of extraordinary beings to translate her ideas for a Best Possible World into actions. She is selecting a group of talented people to conduct the search for these beings who will report directly to the Royal Scribe, Mr Smith. Applications are being received for membership on the Search Team. Describe your talents, examples of how you have used the talents, and your proposed search strategies. Mr Smith will advise the Princess of the most qualified and diverse candidates. Would you be interested in participating? Ron

Princess Photo with Tiara.jpg

Moreover, man is capable of and practices having one foot in time and the other foot in eternity: ie, salvation "is already and not yet", both material and immaterial, in time and timeless.

From: Dan
Date: June 22, 2014, 8:30:51 AM EDT
To: Ronald
Subject: Re: Challenge of Interpolation

God speed with your search for the 'One'.

It is at cross-purposes with the idea of a MoAPS.  


On Jun 21, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Ronald wrote:

I think it is part of your challenge to understand interpolation between the search and BPWH. __Ron

From: Ronald
Date: June 22, 2014, 10:51:32 AM EDT
To: Dan Smith
Cc: Princess Aliyah
Subject: Re: Challenge of Interpolation

Dan,

The only reason we bother is to support your demands, so no action on our part.

Ron

From: Dan Smith
Date: June 22, 2014, 1:39:35 PM EDT
To: "Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike"
Cc: Princess Aliyah, Ron
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

St Anthony,

(Or may I call you Tony?)

In any case, yes, we are facing significant time constraints, IMHO.

Until my wife, Debbie, intervened, the Princess and I had been focusing on D-day arriving by next June, at the latest.

In common (ufo) parlance, D-day refers to Disclosure day.

Then the Princess got a call counseling patience for me, and urging her to find the 'One'.

Ron then suggested the formation of a search committee, asking me to be the facilitator.

I, on the other hand, had been requesting the Princess' hand in the formation of a focus group. We now seem to be at loggerheads wrt the relative priorities. Perhaps you can help us in regrouping.

I would be happy to fill you in on the BPWH, in the meantime.

Dan


On Jun 22, 2014, at 11:13 AM, "Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike" wrote:


Xtraordinary Men Int'l

St Anthony - tough questions, smart answers

Glad to see that our CIA buddy, Ron Pandolfi, 56, in Great Falls, VA and his Kashmiri Princess wife, Aliyah Pandolfi, and their associate, Dan Smith, 70, in Baltimore, MD are all working together for a best possible world which is that the world is coming to an end in 1000 yrs whether you like it or not and that'll be the best solution for all our problems. Yer, well that's the reason why people jump off cliffs, but in the case of planet earth it was decreed in the Bible that the world would come to an end 7000 yrs after Adam & Eve and be replaced with a new heavenly world. Well, its now 6000 yrs after Adam & Eve so looks like our best possible world buddies are correct. The only thing is that the Second Coming of Christ is now in doubt as he's supposed to come 6000 yrs after Adam & Eve ie. now, or more precisely on Thurs 30th May 2030. The problem is that other events have not yet transpired such as the 6th Seal earthquake and the 7th Seal judgments and also the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem. Time, therefore, is running out and has in fact run out ie. we've run into overtime. Thus, the end of the world scenario has been accelerated to right now if God fails to intervene.
Yours in the battle for planet earth,
Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike (UK)
Cosmic Research Foundation
Markapur, A.P. 523316, India

From: Dan Smith
Date: June 22, 2014, 2:41:09 PM EDT
To: Ronald
Cc: "Rev Dr Anthony G. Pike", Princess Aliyah
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

You sound like an elitist.  Are you a 1%-er or something?  

Or maybe you are looking for the cambridge/cosmic phone book.   My dad always said that if you needed 12 people to run the world, and you had the Harvard Board of Overseers at your disposal, you would do much better to merely choose the first twelve names out of the Cambridge phone book.  


On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Ronald wrote:

The Search is to find Extraordinary Beings to participate on the Focus Group.  This is to avoid simply selecting the usual suspects. __Ron

From: Ronald
Date: June 22, 2014, 4:06:24 PM EDT
To: Chris L
Cc: Dan Smith
Subject: Fwd: Extraordinary Beings

Perhaps Chris has a suggestion. __Ron

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ronald
Date: Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings
To: Dan Smith

Hi Dan,

An "elitist" would select the Harvard Board.  Your Dad said it would do better selecting randomly from the phone book than the Harvard Board, but he did not say that a random search was the best option.  The best option is a concerted search using a variety of modalities followed by objective and subjective selection strategies.  Worse than the Harvard Board is the usual hangers at the local Tavern.  There many paths for you to take, but only one is the correct path.

V/r,

Ron

From: Dan
Date: June 22, 2014, 4:44:39 PM EDT
To: Ronald
Cc: Chris
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

It goes without saying that I would select the Bouncer before selecting any one of the patrons.  

From: Dan Smith
Date: June 23, 2014, 5:48:19 PM EDT
To: Chris L
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

Chris,  

There has been something of a new push for disclosure, coming mainly from just Ron and me, over the past month or so, but my wife, Debbie, is currently putting constraints on my participation, and things are presently in hiatus.  This present correspondence, initiated by Ron, was the latest development.  

Aliyah got a phone call, weekend before last, counseling patience for me, and urging her to find the 'One', and thus Ron's suggestion of a search committee.  

I, on the other hand, have been requesting a focus group in preparation for an imminent disclosure.  Ron suggests that these two purposes need not be exclusive of each other.  

And where did you and I leave off, in KC......?  

Below, you seem to adhere to the standard modern cosmology, with ET civilizations, etc.  My impression of the CTMU, however, is that it could be amenable to a premodern, geocentric cosmology.  Is this a mistaken impression?  

Dan

From: Gary
Date: June 23, 2014, 10:25:21 PM EDT
To: Dan
Subject: What exactly is Ron up to in the search for the extraordinary?

I am curious.

Speaking of extraordinary beings and God, I did notice that SKorea idol Ryu Sera was reading this book while on location shooting a music video.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Lovesick-God-Answering-Longings/dp/0768439795

From: Dan
Date: June 24, 2014, 12:03:04 PM EDT
To: Chris
Cc: Ron, Princess Aliyah
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

Ok, let's try this.......

The CTMU is anthropo-, geo-, theo-, Christocentric, 'by default'.  Full stop.....??

Where is the courage of your convictions, Chris?  

Is this the best possible world or not?  Is God hedging his bets?  Are you?  

WWGD?  WWJD?  They would not hedge their bets, would they?  

When you were a bouncer, did you ask your (inebriated) patrons to engage in what-if scenarios, or did you duck-walk them to the nearest exit?  

I need you, and so does God, IMHO.  Do you doubt your own significance within the cosmic schema?  If you have something of significance to impart to the world, do you truly suppose that God would allow the Harvard Board of Overseers to grind you down?  

The only God I know, gave his full measure without flinching.  Can we afford to do less?  

cc: (my responses only) OMF

From: Gary
Date: June 24, 2014, 3:04:16 PM EDT
To: "Dan T. Smith"
Subject: Question

Is Ron interested in recruitment opportunities for extraordinary activities for a BPW?

From: Dan Smith
Date: June 24, 2014, 5:10:55 PM EDT
To: Chris L
Cc: Ron, Princess Aliyah
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

Is there anything in the following line of reasoning that might be viewed as rocket science....?

Given that there is a coherent source of creation, is there any reason to suppose that there would be more than one self-contained creation?

If so, what would that number be, coherently speaking?

The lack of any reasonable answer should not come as a surprise.

OTOH, should not the singularity of the Creator be reflected in the singularity of the Creation?

Could Leibniz have seriously gotten this wrong?

And do you not have a serious clue as to the human significance of this cosmogonic question?

God the hedger? God has been ascribed many attributes in the course of history, but until now, never this one. Does it not call for discussion?

Einstein suggested that God does not play dice. I suggest that the only thing that God cannot do, is play dice. But he so much wanted to, even by proxy, that he sent his son to encourage the centurions to do so. This is my attempt at gallows humor.

From: Dan
Date: June 25, 2014, 3:06:08 PM EDT
To: Chris L
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

Chris,

Is not the CTMU compatible with a teleological understanding?  

Are the Telos and the Logos not then closely related, logically?

You rightfully put great emphasis on the universality of the Logos.

However, countenancing more than one Creation would strongly imply more than one Telos and Logos, would it not?  

cc: (my response only) OMF

From: Dan
Date: June 25, 2014, 3:18:31 PM EDT
To: Chris L
Subject: Re: Extraordinary Beings

(cont.)  

And, speaking of the Logos, would Jesus not need to be incarnated in each creation, almost as a matter of logic?