Open Minds Forum



Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Open Minds Forum

Open Minds Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.

Latest topics

» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeToday at 2:35 am by Mr. Janus

» Livin Your Best Life
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeToday at 1:52 am by Mr. Janus

» Why are we here?
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeYesterday at 6:13 pm by Big Bunny Love

» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeThu May 09, 2024 11:52 pm by Mr. Janus

» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeFri Apr 19, 2024 1:13 am by Mr. Janus

» CockaWHO!?
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeTue Apr 02, 2024 10:41 pm by Mr. Janus

» Scientists plan DNA hunt for Loch Ness monster next month
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeSat Mar 23, 2024 1:32 am by Mr. Janus

» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeSat Mar 16, 2024 12:01 am by Mr. Janus

» Earth Intelligence
Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Icon_minitimeMon Mar 04, 2024 1:04 am by Mr. Janus

Who's Disclosure is Disclosure?

Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:16 am by Cyrellys

The narrative war is in full swing. When there's a 100 different competing narratives, how is it possible to discern a disclosure?

Is it akin to which truth is Truth?




May 2024

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Calendar Calendar


+10
GSB/SSR
ScaRZ
pman35
Sparky
Nib
Bard
Admin
Mur
dan
Jake Reason
14 posters

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:41 pm

    First topic message reminder :

    2:40pm EST

    White Smoke 30 min ago.... Watching it live... awaiting the New Pope to walk out on the balcony. Vatican Guards and Italian Naval Soldiers marching on the steps of St.Peters Basilica, to the music of the Marching Band.




    --------------------------

    edit notice: This thread is the Part Two continuation from the original thread - last post here -

    https://openmindsforum.forumotion.com/t6p990-hello-cy-hello-omf-ii#2215




    Last edited by Jake Reason on Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:59 pm; edited 3 times in total
    pman35
    pman35
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 183
    Join date : 2012-04-25

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by pman35 Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:24 pm

    @Dan lol , Honestly my friend there is nothing , Only those that wish us ill harm should be the ones running to the hills.


    _________________
    Compass Morainn Tech Team Member
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:43 pm

    dan wrote:Pman,

    Well, I don't know. It does look like you are ready to wail on someone! And so does, Cy. I guess we'd all better be on good behavior. Even Mur seems to have gotten the message.......


    Not all the warrior kings are tyrants. Creative Power is a tool that can be used for ill or for the benefit of the many. However fleeting the individuals who wield it.

    One raindrop raises the sea. Every ancient mariner understood this.




    Even those who wander beneath timeless histories of pain, secrecy, or shame have the protection of the warrior kings who live by the sword.

    So there yet lies a home for the spurned and the shamed, where both are free to walk together on a higher road, when they are ready. Here or elsewhere. That promise lies secured.

    Hense even Mur moves here undisturbed so long as his chaos is left the other side of the door.

    Cy


    Last edited by Admin on Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:50 pm; edited 1 time in total


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    pman35
    pman35
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 183
    Join date : 2012-04-25

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by pman35 Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:52 pm

    And I am very ancient Smile


    _________________
    Compass Morainn Tech Team Member
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:26 pm

    From: Dan
    Date: April 28, 2013, 2:05:57 PM EDT
    To: Jack Sarfatti
    Cc: Paul and David

    (cont........)

    What are the objections, so far? How much further need we go? Are we not, just in these 5 baby-steps, already at the threshold of the BPWH?

    Is this rocket science? I don't think so. It need not even be brain surgery, unless I have to beat you over the head with its Simplicity.

    The one thing that Jack had so much trouble understanding, in our last filming, was the distinction between the human eye and the God's eye PoV. We are inside the hologram, and God is outside. When we are playing a computer game, with total immersion into its virtual reality, that reality can be anything, but we do hope that it is the best possible something, up to and including the point at which we unplug ourselves from the Game, i.e. when we awaken from our slumber of materialism, and take on God's perspective.

    Jack is, quite naturally, reluctant to make a fool of himself, especially in public, and so he keeps casting his holy aspersions at me. There is also the John Wheeler syndrome at work here. John would admit to almost any crazy idea, except for the most obvious one, which is the likelihood of any form of parapsychology. And so did he keep himself and his reputation from going off the metaphysical deep end. And this is Jack wrt any form of messy antics. And he comes by this particular aversion very honestly, having grown up with it, as I understand.

    So, yes, Jack, we all sympathize with your phobias, but....... there is some work to be done. We will try to go easy on you, and maybe, just maybe, you could shed just a few less crocodile tears, when certain subjects come up. Be a little less like the old lady, who, when she sees a mouse, climbs on the stool and screams...... eeeeeeek!


    (cont......2)
    From: Dan
    Date: April 28, 2013, 3:09:47 PM EDT
    To: Jack Sarfatti
    Cc: Paul and David

    Subject: Re: Baby steps, Jack.......

    (cont......2)


    And do keep in mind that I'm only a pretend, virtual mouse. But my act must be pretty good, if I can freak-out, Jack.


    I guess what I'm saying about the future horizon is that we are just about to meet it, and it is us! Imagine our surprise, pleasant or otherwise.

    Well, it's not us, just as we are now. It is our future selves, more thoroughly plugged into the future horizon, and psychically plugged into each other and God. And that is just the point of our Apocatastasis, where we become one with God. We will have met our Maker, and she is us!

    We always have been one with God, i.e. being the braincells of God, but this is the sleeping God, or reposing Buddha. But as we move back into our aboriginal dreamtime, as afore, that is when God reawakens, and is resurrected though us. Our self-activating cosmic circuit becomes...... wait for it...... self-activated. See how smart I am, figuring all this out, just on my little lonesome. But that, of course, is a lie. In retrospect, we see that this idea has been creeping around inside our little noggins, from day one. Someone just had to standup and point at the King, declaring him to be a figment. Who better than Chicken Little? Eeeeeek a freak......! Our descendants become our ancestors, just like that.

    So, what else is new? I'll tell you what....... It may be that the hollow Earthers are right, after all, well, almost. No, we're not living inside a planet...... we're actually living inside of a black-hole. Well, this is a slight metaphor, but it may be more accurate than it seems, at first blush.

    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:58 pm

    Admin wrote:
    dan wrote:Pman,

    Well, I don't know. It does look like you are ready to wail on someone! And so does, Cy. I guess we'd all better be on good behavior. Even Mur seems to have gotten the message.......


    Not all the warrior kings are tyrants. Creative Power is a tool that can be used for ill or for the benefit of the many. However fleeting the individuals who wield it.

    One raindrop raises the sea. Every ancient mariner understood this.




    Even those who wander beneath timeless histories of pain, secrecy, or shame have the protection of the warrior kings who live by the sword.

    So there yet lies a home for the spurned and the shamed, where both are free to walk together on a higher road, when they are ready. Here or elsewhere. That promise lies secured.

    Hense even Mur moves here undisturbed so long as his chaos is left the other side of the door.

    Cy


    Hail to each these Sons of Somerled!


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:24 am

    Cy,

    Hail, hail, the gang's all here.......?

    From: Dan
    Date: April 29, 2013, 11:11:23 AM EDT
    To: Jackpacbell
    Cc: 11 others....

    Subject: Numbskull, Jack.......

    Dick and David,

    Thank you for the information and advice. Now, see if you can help me with Jack's problem.......


    I think we have it pretty clear that he doesn't want to play Jesus, not even on TV. He doesn't quite have the stomach for it.

    What makes Jack a numbskull is that he thinks I want to play a physicist, on TV. No, Jack, I want to play a metaphysician, on TV, and that's not quite the same thing. It's more like playing a doctor, in fact.

    See, Jack, numbskull that you are, you were so stooopid that you, and some of your buddies, thought you could bury religion. Well, in Britain and Europe you have almost succeeded. In the rest of the world, you are still, maybe, a couple centuries short of that, provided even that we have that many centuries left, which is why I am here, despite all your numbskullishness.

    See, Jack, in the end, it's about hearts and minds. I labor under the impression that, although I may have neither one, I might be able, push come to shove, to also play Tom Sawyer, on TV. IOW, I can trick other people, those with real minds and real hearts, into helping me to save the world, despite ourselves.

    Lucky me, I do have a check book, but, as I keep explaining, it's gonna run out, way before the world is saved, so I'm only looking to do a little pump-priming, here, investing in the putative future, as it were........ Uh, oh, did I say the check was in the mail? Well, I lied.



    On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:23 AM, Jackpacbell wrote:

    I personally don't give a damn about the bible stuff

    Dick LOL

    We humor Dan

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Apr 29, 2013, at 4:49 AM, David G. wrote:

    If you want to talk eschatology talk The War Scroll from Cave 4 at Qumram or their commentary on the Star prophecy of Daniel with roiled the eastern Mediterranean for generations until the Bar Kochva rebellion was finally snuffed out after unprecedented loss of life on both sides. All of that nonsense about spirit had nothing to do with Jesus. It was Paul's fictionalized Christ Jesus which proved the maxim " if you have to choose between facts and legend; print the legend."

    One can quite clearly see how cleverly Paul turned the words of James and Peter upside down in order to ridicule them in Acts. His masterful exposition of the heavenly tablecloth makes Peter look like a weak buffoon. as intended. Peter is a perfect example of someone who is totally written out of history and insulted to boot ! Ah well, the victors write the history and the Bibles too!

    Given that belief in physical resurrection was widely held in Palestine, it's no surprise to see it in any if the texts. The innovation was to spiritualize the whole matter,after the Greek fashion for sky gods, stealing the high ground do to speak, from the more literal founders of the Church, such as James the Just, personally attested by Paul in Acts to be Jesus' brother 'in the flesh'; something many of the Church fathers did their best to falsify.

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Apr 28, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Dick F wrote:

    >>> In a message dated 4/28/2013 10:59:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Jack writes:
    You're going to die soon Dan.
    Your Eschaton is all Sound & Fury
    A Tale told by a Useful Idiot
    Nuff said.

    PS cut the "4M/K/SoT/X2" obscurantism

    Just make sure the check clears Z. ;-) <<<


    Dan,

    Your personal "Messianic Legacy" notwithstanding, there are two elements of your Eschaton impersonation gambit you apparently are overlooking. But first (seriously), my commentary merits a sound-track, and the words here actually "speak" to what you seem to be propounding. Play it; listen as you read my fodder.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjlbCBCjoEQ

    1.) The "crucifixion" aspect, perhaps not literally. But Robert Heinlein had somewhat of a got at this in his Stranger in a Strange Land, when after Valentine Michael Smith (his protagonist, human-born-on-Mars who came to Earth, etc., etc. -- read the book if you've not or have forgotten this element) met his death, his physical body, well the fleshy edible parts, were consumed ceremonially by his dearest and best friends.

    Obviously a paean to the transubstantiation of Jesus ("body and blood," although we Presbyterians don't hold it so literally... it's symbolic bread chunks and grape juice, for us ;-) and what the Roman Catholics did to him, but I digress, the point being that any "Messiah," whether proclaimed or self-anointed, is cross-bound.

    2.) In that same vein, (oops, sorry -- awful pun), the Christian narrative holds that Jesus "is coming back," and of course the timing is very nearly always "soon." Now, if HE does actually return, in a body of some type, "ethereal" or otherwise, he's going to have to sort out his competing followers, who've spent the better part of two millennia since our culture began counting the years since his birth as our calendar slaughtering one another (as Richard Harris's poem I recently shared with you rather eloquently elucidated).

    Point being, Dan, one doesn't just go to the "Christians In Action," (i.e., your references to "Ron," as if our friend Pandolfi has ascended to the right hand of G-d and not some other guy named Clapper or whatever) and announce that you'd like to die in a "suicide by Pharisees," such that the Agency is going to phoney up some credentials, give you a ride on one of the "whiz-bang flying gizmos" (the kind that fool the Mexicans and other slack-jawed cloud waters who then run to wherever Bill Birnes is shooting "UFO Hunters" to give a knuckle-dragging delight of an interview of what they "believe" they saw, replete with zooming in and out of fuzzy imagery, voiced over by Bill and his UFO-nots until it's time for the commercial, in this case Viagra?

    Which reminds me, Dan, if you're going to get into the whole "theology marketing" shtick, to set yourself and your product line apart, you might take a page from the aforementioned Viagra ad copy, specifically what is by far THE BEST sales line in human history, disguised of course as a cautionary note for the legal eagles.

    That being, "To avoid injury, if you experience an erection lasting more than four hours..." at which point no human male has ever heard the rest of the line, nor for that matter have their erstwhile menopausal sexual playmates, who already are chafing at the mere thought of "four hours" of being ridden by their flaccid old men, but again I digress. Still, the sexual element of your envisioned "Temple of Daniel," (whoa... actually that name has been used previously, "lions den" and all ;-) is not to be disregarded. Ask any priest, OK?

    On a more liberal plane, of Christian Apocalyptic Eschatology, some of the rather better philosophy tells us that the actual "return" of Jesus, or rather of the Christed energy he represented during his visit to Earth, is more in the "spiritual realms," i.e., hence the "Do unto others as you would have it done unto you," and my personal fave, "As you do to the least of these, my brethren, so you do unto me." Right up there with JFK's "Ask not..." and Ron Reagan's, "Mr. Gorbachev... tear down that wall!" in terms of memorable headlines.

    Seriously, Dan. The whole "Spaceship Earth" needing a captain on her bridge was handled by Buckminster Fuller, or so John Denver told me (back in '81, when he visited Calypso in Norfolk, VA after a concert and we had a party on board, where we all drank too much sangria and sang "Aye, Calypso!" with John leading it!
    Later on -- and I was on board because we office and support base staffers were invited to the party, too -- I was on the bridge with John, both of us more or less "holding up the wheel" (helm) as the ship rocked to and fro, as we looked out over the lights of Norfolk and Portsmouth (VA) harbor. See, that whole gig, and those of us who were working it "back when," was aiming at helping to promote an ethos where WE, i.e., those of humanity who are becoming informed and who are capable of THINKING, LEARNING and GROWING and most importantly, essentially, of also SHARING what we're seeing so that others might see for themselves.

    Anyway, if you'll recall, this was when Reagan was "launching" SDI ("Star Wars"... by the way, where IS that deployment, anyway? ;-) and the whole "retail UFOlogy" latest incarnation was incubating in Falcon's mind.

    John Denver was working on his own approach, through his "Windstar Foundation," and John also was on the citizens advisory group for the Office of Science and Technology Policy (he was a civil engineer by his formal education, later a commercially rated pilot; his dad was a USAF pilot with whom John reconciled -- they'd sort of "fallen out" over the Vietnam War thing -- by John hiring his dad to pilot his personal 727. My point is, Dan, that all you have to do to "get noticed" is to focus, focus, focus and DO SOMETHING great!

    Come on, Dan! I mean, what do Paris Hilton or the Kardashians have that make them "famous," compared to a guy who descended from a lineage of Eisenhower officialdom, true blue-blooded Establishmentarian stock, who isn't afraid to hang himself out there, making claims and offering himself up as our American Eucharist?

    Heck, even Usama bin Laden had similar background, in his own culture. He offered himself up as "Caliph," and until he had a run-in with DevGru in Pakistan, he was doing pretty well. Online chattering, offering up advice and guidance about how to wage Jihad, I mean. OK, it's different strokes for Islamists, but you're a Christian Danny-Come-Lately, so why don't you just show up in Washington (or St. Louis, or wherever; it's the home of Anheiser-Busch, so you'd get lots of attention is what I'm meaning ;-) and ANNOUNCE THAT YOU ARE THE MESSIAH, and all that we beknighted Earthlings need to do is FOLLOW YOU to E.T.?

    Why might that not work?

    Taking some looney messiah's "vision," which claims to "chart a course for Planet Earth," hasn't worked out very well in the past. You can debate the reasons... actually, there are universities and seminaries which do precisely that... well, OK. Not precisely at all. But they whittle away at it, making lots of chips and nobody who is actually ENGAGED in trying to make a difference, make a living or even live long enough to suffer and be hungry for another day, watch your latest baby die from not having clean water or watch your daughter go to seek a better life and get hooked into sex trafficking, it matters not at all to where Spaceship Earth may be heading, if it's not already -- as Jack is suggesting -- certifiably "extinct" as a civilization, even though the last human specimens are far from dead. Extinction is an inability to adapt and thus survive, Dan, either as a result of environmental catastrophe or some genetic impairment or, as may be the case with us humans, a fatal information overload resulting in lost of operational coherence, akin to losing cabin pressure on a brain.

    You may benefit from a "decompression stop," Dan, as you try to surface -- slowly, following your slowest bubbles to the air-water interface, or in your present case wherever consensus reality meets your fantasy.
    (Sorry... my 36 years as a scuba instructor make me not want to see you get "the bends" or embolize.)

    That being said, are you coming to Washington tomorrow morning for the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure?

    If there's ever an opportunity for you to launch a "Name Dan Christ" campaign, this is it. It's a slow news week coming up, compared to the last two, unless "Little Kim" gets jealous over having been slammed off the front pages by those two pinheads from Dagostan and their wackier momma. We need some fun here!

    As ever,

    Dick Farley
    Washington, DC USA




    Last edited by dan on Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:30 am; edited 1 time in total
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:23 am

    G'morning Dan.

    For our eschatological poindering: https://wwwprd1.doa.louisiana.gov/OSP/LaPAC/Agency/PDF/AGPSContracts/K408894.PDF

    FEMA seems to think it needs 200,000 death certificates on hand.


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:32 am

    Dan wrote:Cy,

    Hail, hail, the gang's all here.......?

    From: Dan
    Date: April 29, 2013, 11:11:23 AM EDT
    To: Jackpacbell
    Cc: 11 others....

    I wasn't included. Should I take it as a sign?
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:06 pm

    Poor FEMA, they only want to keep us on our toes.......

    Not included........ Certainly not by me. I'm being quite conservative about lists. My base list, at this sensitive time, is just Jack, David and Paul. Jack then adds his own list. I may use that one, or fall back to the three. If I add you too frequently, it might be misconstrued, and we wouldn't that.

    I'm am quite reluctant to place any undue pressure on those three. Bear with me, please.

    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:14 pm

    nyracum
    12:46 PM (12 minutes ago)

    to me, and 12 others

    Well, in that case I'd say Dan is a glutton for punishment ;-)



    ****


    My reply I will put here:

    Dan doesn't have to worry. OMF is his home. I don't beat people over their head for their uniqueness, eccentricities, or their methods without just cause.

    Cy


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:24 pm

    Cy,

    I doubt that I would be here, if I didn't know that.

    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:23 pm

    dan wrote:
    Not included........ Certainly not by me. I'm being quite conservative about lists. My base list, at this sensitive time, is just Jack, David and Paul. Jack then adds his own list. I may use that one, or fall back to the three. If I add you too frequently, it might be misconstrued, and we wouldn't that.

    I'm am quite reluctant to place any undue pressure on those three. Bear with me, please.
    Thanks Dan, I understand. Jack has included me in science related emails in the meantime and so it was probably an oversight. Cy kindly sent me one of the finals that included much of today's chat. Nice picture isn't it? Hadn't seen an authentic image before.

    Speaking of pics....Well surprise to your new avatar image, Dan. Kashmir is becoming quite the focal point. Who can know the future of the old silk road.


    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:04 pm

    Mur wrote:
    Jake Reason wrote: I really don't think it matters Who is President any more. They're just employees now.

    Correct!
    If we know it, then there are millions of others who also do. I wonder how much longer will it be until the pendulum of public awareness shifts to a majority.

    What will then happen when the majority understands that the President didn't do this nor that, didn't enact this or that, didn't choose this nor that. But that a President is only required to take the credit or blame. For 90+ percent of it, he has little or no power to effect the decision.

    Then, all political science and the assemblance of public practice, will change. In ways that most people now would find difficult to imagine. And yet it will be them who make the change.


    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:48 pm

    Dan wrote:
    Then there was Michael Klare..... The Race for What's Left.......

    He believes that seven billion might be sustainable. No one in our little group believes that. He focuses just on the oil/energy problem. Other members of the audience did express skepticism. We kept quiet.

    But what else can anyone say, when standing in front of the public? I would not. The dire future, I can only frame in the BPWH. You cannot tell folks that only one in ten or one in a hundred will be alive in twenty years. Ain't no way. I wouldn't even tell my son, or especially not him.
    Dan,
    These words have weighed heavily on me these past few days. And Jack's, "Too late 4 tech breakthrough for everyone only a small elite may survive and probably not even them IMHO."

    So much certainty you hold. The inevitable, you're sure. No chance, no way to avoid.

    But what of the younger sons?

    The ones who are going to re-make the world. For they have no choice but to discard the ways of their forefathers. You say, you wouldn't even tell your own son.

    Are the sons so unaware that they don't see the writing on the wall? Gee, how old were our singing stars when one wrote, "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls"? 1965, Paul was only 23 years of age!

    Do you really think today's 'sons' are not aware?

    Do you think they don't know that Presidents don't run the show?

    Do you think they will allow their parents to flush the world down the drain? Will they all merely want to know they have a waiting safety raft?

    Or will they force their parent's world to change? And insure their own children's future?



    avatar
    Sparky
    Full Member
    Full Member


    Posts : 15
    Join date : 2012-04-25

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Sparky Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:58 am

    “Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much." Luke 16:20
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm

    Jake Reason wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    Then there was Michael Klare..... The Race for What's Left.......

    He believes that seven billion might be sustainable. No one in our little group believes that. He focuses just on the oil/energy problem. Other members of the audience did express skepticism. We kept quiet.

    But what else can anyone say, when standing in front of the public? I would not. The dire future, I can only frame in the BPWH. You cannot tell folks that only one in ten or one in a hundred will be alive in twenty years. Ain't no way. I wouldn't even tell my son, or especially not him.
    Dan,
    These words have weighed heavily on me these past few days. And Jack's, "Too late 4 tech breakthrough for everyone only a small elite may survive and probably not even them IMHO."

    So much certainty you hold. The inevitable, you're sure. No chance, no way to avoid.

    But what of the younger sons?

    The ones who are going to re-make the world. For they have no choice but to discard the ways of their forefathers. You say, you wouldn't even tell your own son.

    Are the sons so unaware that they don't see the writing on the wall? Gee, how old were our singing stars when one wrote, "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls"? 1965, Paul was only 23 years of age!

    Do you really think today's 'sons' are not aware?

    Do you think they don't know that Presidents don't run the show?

    Do you think they will allow their parents to flush the world down the drain? Will they all merely want to know they have a waiting safety raft?

    Or will they force their parent's world to change? And insure their own children's future?






    M I O P I A


    Or will they force their parent's world to change? And insure their own children's future?

    ....imagine Dragons.




    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Dragon10


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    Jake Reason
    Jake Reason
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 1008
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Canada

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Jake Reason Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:23 pm

    Thank you MD02 and Cy for this song - Radioactive".

    I checked it out....

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Imagine+Dragons+-+Radioactive&page=1

    Dozens of people have uploaded it to YouTube. And I see view numbers I've never seen before...

    Uploaded by ImagineDragons - 24,538,000 views
    Uploaded by Kevin Troxel - 25,425,000 views
    Uploaded by thesuperkesa - 8,860,000 views

    That's just to name a few. Many more with 100's of thousands of views.

    Other groups have recorded it as well...

    Lindsey Stirling and Pentatonix - 12,934,000 views
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE2GCa-_nyU

    Allie Gardner - acoustic solo gets 371,000 views
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7iUzUxQ2OQ
    Even Allie's qualifies as a Platinum single.

    There are over 70 million youtube views on this song. And these numbers don't include Radio plays.

    That is 20 million more than the best selling single song in history. Bing Crosby's White Christmas. And twice as many as the No2 best selling, Elton John's "Candle in the Wind" @ 33 million.


    Ya, the young people are aware.

    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:24 pm

    Grin. Cy


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    Bard
    Bard
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 588
    Join date : 2012-04-29

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Bard Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:29 pm

    The lyrical colors caught my insights.


    _________________
    "It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves."
    William Shakespeare
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Wed May 01, 2013 8:18 am

    From: Dan
    Date: May 1, 2013, 9:54:20 AM EDT
    To: Paul
    Cc: David
    Subject: Look, ma, no smoking gun.... no hubcaps....

    Where do we start......?

    We go back at least as far as Kant and then on to Mach, Duhem, Quine, Kuhn, etc., wherein notions of coherence and holism were given a modern gloss, and posited in contrast to the prevailing modern ethos of analysis, reductionism and, yes, nihilism/skepticism.

    I suggest that the closest thing that we are going to get to a smoking gun will be the notion of a human soul/self. The soul will be our foot in the door for 'metaphysics'. This will be our metaphysical and political pivot point for the putative MoAPS.

    Then what......?

    I suggest the CTC..... time in a bottle.....

    Yes, this is our leap into the 'void'...... or, more accurately, this is our leap out of the void.

    Self-containment is the mark of coherence. And the Metanarrative of history is its primary manifestation. Physics emerges from this phenomenology. The Ether here is the warp and woof of this tapestry.

    This last statement is meant merely to be a guess that, from a larger perspective, two seemingly disparate concepts, one phenomenological and one physical/metaphysical, ought to be somehow related.

    To be more specific, I suggest that the warp is the recirculating cosmic soul, of which we are all time-sharing partners, actually soul-mates. Mathematics, logic and the Logos make up the 'woof', so, between the warp and the woof, our phenomenology is supported, all within the CTC, the finite bottle, which is bootstrapped into existence by all of us soul-mates, acting from the past, present and future. This is also Chris' version of the Logos, or the SCSRL of his CTMU.

    So this is all I'm doing is pointing to various of the fundamental concepts that ought to be connected, by hook and by crook. Over time, the picture gets filled in.

    I am asking you and David to grok on the Gestalt, and, by almost free association, using whatever mathematical, physical or aesthetic metaphors/tools that might come to mind, to gradually fill in the blank spaces.

    This is simply coherentism at work. This is all that I have ever done.

    What license do we have to reconstruct cosmology/cosmogenesis virtually from scratch? We have the looming eschaton, breathing down our necks. That's all. This is just a somewhat novel form of praying. It is our shotgun/death-bed 'conversion'/conversation.


    Jake,

    Children and grandchildren........ sure. And don't forget God.


    Dick Farley is blogging from Steve Bassett's Citizen Hearing on Disclosure. Nothing really new, other than the six former congress persons who are chairing the various sessions. I take my hat off to Steve, for that coup.

    At Ron's suggestion, I have invited Steven Greer to an annual picnic, hosted by a friend. Ron has requested that Steven bring his new film. Ron is also inviting Peter Davenport. I have invited Dick, and Steve was already on the list. Within the picnic, there is an informal after-party.



    Last edited by dan on Wed May 01, 2013 8:57 am; edited 1 time in total
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 586
    Join date : 2012-03-15
    Location : West Rising

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Admin Wed May 01, 2013 8:54 am

    How about instead of calling it Ether, lets suggest a possible electromagnetic spectrum? Or an existential relationship just ever so slightly out of sync with our existence but with a close enough relationship that it requires electromagnetic energy utilized to cause physical and audible effect within our existential physical environment.


    _________________
    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Wed May 01, 2013 9:21 am

    Cy,

    I gather that you have not quite grokked on the significance of the CTC. This has, in the last few years, become an absolutely crucial part of the BPWH.

    We need to discuss this further.

    Given the CTC, you and I are the co-Creators of the BPW. What exists outside of our time in a bottle, CTC, is simply Eternity. And all of this may also be viewed as the mind of God. This is simply immaterialism/idealism. Do you have a problem with this? Do you prefer dualism?

    From: Dan
    Date: May 1, 2013, 1:43:10 PM EDT
    To: Paul
    Cc: David
    Subject: Top down........

    Here is the main point and key strategy to keep in mind. And I gather that Jack, still, after all these years, has no clue about this, so engrossed is he in his own game.....

    There are three ways by which we approach or interrogate the world.....

    1.) Phenomenologically, or experientially...... consulting with our fellow creatures and with our collective mythoi.

    2.) Scientifically, experimentally...... this involves data acquisition, analysis and then the modeling of or theorizing about the data. The more quantitative or mathematical are the models, the better.

    3.) Rationalizing the world....... this is simply to suppose that there is a rationale for existence. Such a supposition is normally associated with deism or theism.

    I would refer to #2 as the bottom-up approach, and to #3 as the top-down approach. #1 is just starting in the middle.

    I am not aware that #3 has been pursued in modern times, outside of the much ridiculed framework of Leibniz' BPWH. I am simply updating Leibniz' model, focusing particularly on the putative end of technological progress and the depletion of non-renewable resources.


    Cyrellys
    Cyrellys
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 2251
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Age : 53
    Location : Montana

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Cyrellys Wed May 01, 2013 2:44 pm

    our relevancy in regards to creating has challenges created by the fearful permanent government which we might find insurmountable unless we can get a really good hair-brained idea going.

    Please America...wake up. Time is incredibly short before we are all moved into sustainable urban areas, highly regulated and controlled by the United Nations. Look as our country is handed to UNESCO who already own 50% of our beautiful Country including the symbol of all America once stood for, The Statue of Liberty. Watch this movie, make the time to watch it with your family, friends and share it with all your social media. Nothing can be more important than understanding what is happening all around us in every town, city, county, state and our Federal Government as our own sovereignty is taken from us and other nations.......Fred Brownbill





    Who holds more responsibility for sequestering the voices with real keys toward prevention of the implosion the System Lords fear?

    I say responsibility is less relevant than results:

    http://cyrellys.hubpages.com/hub/Thoughts-on-getting-beyond-extraterrestrial-confirmation-May-01-2013

    I see our ability to co-create, is forced to compete with ignorance and obstinate refusal toward establishment of meaningful relational being and thus communication.

    I'm waiting to see if the Citizens effort at confirmation better enables other parties to a wake up call, to move on their foamy wake while there is still time.

    Cy

    -- whatever doubts I may hold or should hold are inappropriate when the goal is to correct a problem that requires no doubts to achieve.

    -- to create you must know it in every way as possible; as real.


    _________________

    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.



    Rue she said Protection
    Rooster's Crow Confusion
    One thing else to end the deed --
    A dog with no Illusion.

    ~ Walter Wangerin Jr., Book of the Dun Cow
    dan
    dan
    Special Guest
    Special Guest


    Posts : 9193
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Location : Baltimore

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by dan Wed May 01, 2013 3:45 pm

    From: Dan
    Date: May 1, 2013, 5:37:03 PM EDT
    To: Paul
    Cc: David
    Subject: Re: Top down........

    (cont.....2)


    So far, so good......

    My concern is to connect or integrate these three approaches to understanding the world.

    The primary connecting link at this point is the concept of the CTC. This concept connects all three levels of inquiry.

    But, first, allow me to expand on #3........

    3'.) Rationalizing the world..... Besides theism and deism, I would include virtually all of philosophy, ancient and modern, as well as pantheism. Even the analytical tradition often points to its own limits, and thus to the boundary between the reductive and non-reductive programs. And keep in mind that continued scholarship finds increasing links between all of these traditions and programs....... ancient, modern, east and west, etc.

    Jack's problem here is that he shares the strongly anti-philosophical bias of his scientific colleagues. I see several aspects or causes of this common bias......

    a.) Historical antipathy between science and religion.

    b.) Science wishes to strengthen and defend its putative hegemony as an arbiter of all truth claims.

    c.) Science wishes to retain its hegemony wrt plotting the human future, particularly through the indefinite continuation of technological progress.

    d.) Science defines its interests as virtually identical with those of modern, political secularism.


    Ok, back to the CTC........

    The concept of a CTC is borrowed from a fairly obscure branch of cosmology. The possibility of CTC's was first raised by Kurt Godel in 1949. Generally, CTC's are presumed to occur within a larger, more conventional space-time frame or universe. I am suggesting, however that, if our world is a CTC, it is self-contained within Eternity, i.e. within an atemporal context.

    This CTC example raises several important issues, when it comes to our integration strategy.......


    (cont.......3)


    Cy,

    Yes, humanity, even at it's present levels of population and consumption is not sustainable, and, yet, both population and consumption continue to grow, without any foreseeable limits, other than by collapse.

    Why aren't the ET's intervening, we might ask? Is there not a technological fix for our resource predicament?

    I have communicated with you for some time, but I have yet to see you squarely confront this predicament.

    Cyrellys
    Cyrellys
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 2251
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Age : 53
    Location : Montana

    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Cyrellys Wed May 01, 2013 5:12 pm

    dan wrote:
    From: Dan
    Date: May 1, 2013, 5:37:03 PM EDT
    To: Paul
    Cc: David
    Subject: Re: Top down........

    (cont.....2)


    So far, so good......

    My concern is to connect or integrate these three approaches to understanding the world.

    The primary connecting link at this point is the concept of the CTC. This concept connects all three levels of inquiry.

    But, first, allow me to expand on #3........

    3'.) Rationalizing the world..... Besides theism and deism, I would include virtually all of philosophy, ancient and modern, as well as pantheism. Even the analytical tradition often points to its own limits, and thus to the boundary between the reductive and non-reductive programs. And keep in mind that continued scholarship finds increasing links between all of these traditions and programs....... ancient, modern, east and west, etc.

    Jack's problem here is that he shares the strongly anti-philosophical bias of his scientific colleagues. I see several aspects or causes of this common bias......

    a.) Historical antipathy between science and religion.

    b.) Science wishes to strengthen and defend its putative hegemony as an arbiter of all truth claims.

    c.) Science wishes to retain its hegemony wrt plotting the human future, particularly through the indefinite continuation of technological progress.

    d.) Science defines its interests as virtually identical with those of modern, political secularism.


    Ok, back to the CTC........

    The concept of a CTC is borrowed from a fairly obscure branch of cosmology. The possibility of CTC's was first raised by Kurt Godel in 1949. Generally, CTC's are presumed to occur within a larger, more conventional space-time frame or universe. I am suggesting, however that, if our world is a CTC, it is self-contained within Eternity, i.e. within an atemporal context.

    This CTC example raises several important issues, when it comes to our integration strategy.......


    (cont.......3)


    Cy,

    Yes, humanity, even at it's present levels of population and consumption is not sustainable, and, yet, both population and consumption continue to grow, without any foreseeable limits, other than by collapse.

    Why aren't the ET's intervening, we might ask? Is there not a technological fix for our resource predicament?

    I have communicated with you for some time, but I have yet to see you squarely confront this predicament.



    I have squarely confronted it but those who've been present generally don't listen.

    Population is not the biggest issue in the majority of locations around the world. Corruption is. And thoughtlessness is.

    An example of corruption can be maintaining the population below a living wage so that it takes many income streams to sustain a single household.

    An example of thoughtlessness can be something as simple as the manufacturer Craftsman tools creating a new more efficient, smaller in size and weight battery which still clips onto your cordless drill or cordless saw BUT it does not fit in your original charger. It is not labeled as being incompatible with the same generation of parts (i.e. the charger) as the generation of the tool you originally purchased (i.e. the cordless drill or saw). There is no notation on the box. So you purchase the new lithium ion batteries thinking of all the electricity you'll save (because batteries do go bad) but then you get home and come to find out it just made your original charger obsolete because the company wants to double dip by making you buy new chargers which according to the box of the new batteries is the exact same model and draws the same watts.

    What is good for the goose the gander is exempt from.

    I still see 10-20 foot easements on either side of roads which serve no real purpose - they are not grazed to produce meat for the tables of the hungry. They are not planted to fulfill food shortages claimed to exist around the world.

    Soils are still raped by chemicals as opposed to infused with vermiculture.

    People in cities spend their spare time watching sports instead of creating systems, tools, businesses, and products which could make such comments about populations obsolete.

    Dan it is NOT that we are overpopulated or unsustainable in anything except in MIND.

    The resources and the space exists but it is being used in all the wrong ways. The population is being harassed, stripped of their natural rights, and prepared for being forced into highly regulated environments rather than empowered as stewards of this planet.

    This is a world which has more potable or transmutable water than any generation prior to it and yet we fight and squabble over it. And we let pencil pushing elites who've never gotten dirty in the dirt to know the truth of the ideas they subject others to, bend our ears and our minds till there's nothing left capable of thinking with reason.

    But package something in sweet enough terms and most will leave their brain cells spinning at the couch.

    Responsible stewardship means using resources wisely and with thought to circumstances.

    There is not enough fuel cries the many who spent his day burning a tank around town to impress his buddies with the sound if his old school engine and smoking tires.

    There is not enough corn cries Monsanto who spends its days creating a virus infused genetically modified organism that kills off the ecology in any area it is planted.

    But I know nothing! A simple planter and herdsman with no experience to point out the obvious?

    Hummmmmm. Cy


    _________________

    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.



    Rue she said Protection
    Rooster's Crow Confusion
    One thing else to end the deed --
    A dog with no Illusion.

    ~ Walter Wangerin Jr., Book of the Dun Cow

    Sponsored content


    Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2 - Page 11 Empty Re: Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat May 11, 2024 6:05 am