Open Minds Forum



Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Open Minds Forum

Open Minds Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.

Latest topics

» Why are we here?
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeYesterday at 12:26 pm by dan

» WRATH OF THE GODS/TITANS
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeSun Nov 24, 2024 8:36 pm by U

» OMF STATE OF THE UNION
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeFri Nov 22, 2024 10:22 pm by U

» Disclosure - For U by U
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeThu Nov 21, 2024 10:08 pm by U

» The scariest character in all fiction
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeThu Nov 21, 2024 6:47 pm by U

» Uanon's Majikal Misery Tour "it's all smiles on the magic school bus"
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeSun Nov 10, 2024 9:36 pm by Mr. Janus

» What Music Are You Listening To ?
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeSat Nov 09, 2024 12:34 am by U

» Livin Your Best Life
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeWed Nov 06, 2024 8:55 am by Post Eschaton Punk

» Baudrillardian hauntology - what are some haunting truths to our reality?
Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Icon_minitimeSun Nov 03, 2024 3:07 pm by dan

Where did all the Open Minds Forum members go?

Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:29 pm by Admin

With Open Minds Forum restored now for almost half a year at it's new location with forumotion.com we can now turn to look at reaching out to OMF's original members who have not yet returned home. OMF's original membership was over 6,000 members strong, prior to the proboards suspension, according to the rolls of the time. We can probably safely assume that some of those accounts were unidentified socks. If we were to assume a reasonable guess of maybe as many as 30% possible sock accounts then that would leave potentially somewhere between 4800 to 4900 possible real members to locate. That is still a substantial number of people.

Who were all these people? Some were average individuals with common interests in ufology, exopolitics, globalism, corruption, earthchanges, science and technology, and a variety of other interests. Some just enjoyed being part of a vibrant and unusually interesting community. Others were representative of various insider groups participating in observation and outreach projects, while still others were bonafide intelligence community personnel. All with stake in the hunt for truth in one fashion or another. Some in support of truth, and communication. Others seeking real disclosure and forms of proof. And others highly skeptical of anything or limited subjects. The smallest division of membership being wholly anti-disclosure oriented.

So where did these members vanish to? They had many options. There are almost innumerable other forums out there on the topics of UFO's or Exopolitics, the Unexplained, and Conspiracy Theory. Did they disappear into the world-wide network of forum inhabitants? Did some go find new homes on chatrooms or individual blogs? Did they participate in ufo conventions or other public events and gatherings? How about those who represented groups in special access? Or IC and military observers? Those with academic affiliations? Where did they all go and what would be the best way to reach out and extend an invitation to return?

And what constitutes a situation deserving of their time and participation? Is the archive enough? How exactly do people within the paradigm most desire to define a community? Is it amenities, humanity or simply population size for exposure? Most of the special guests have been emailed and have expressed that population size for exposure is what most motivates them. But not all. Long-time member Dan Smith has other priorities and values motivating his participation. Should this open opportunities for unattached junior guests who have experience and dialog to contribute to the world? How best to make use of OMF's time, experience and resources?

Many skeptics would like to see the historical guardian of discourse opportunity to just up and disappear; go into permanent stasis. They think that not everyone has a right to speak about their experiences and if there is no proof involved then there can philosophically be no value to discourse. I personally would respectfully disagree with them. Discourse has always been the prelude to meaningful relationships and meaningful mutual relationships have always been the prelude to exchanges of proof. In a contentious social environment with regards to communication vs disclosure how do we best re-establish a haven for those preludes? Is it only the "if we build it they will come" answer? Well considering OMF has been largely fully functional over the last four or five months this line of reasoning is not necessarily true. So what would be the best way re-establish this? Your suggestions are sought. Please comment.





November 2024

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Calendar Calendar


    Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection

    Cyrellys
    Cyrellys
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 2251
    Join date : 2012-04-25
    Age : 54
    Location : Montana

    Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection Empty Secrecy News - Email Newsletter Collection

    Post by Cyrellys Wed May 01, 2013 10:20 am

    Secrecy News -- 05/01/13
    Inbox
    x


    Steven Aftergood
    9:25 AM (54 minutes ago)

    to me
    Format Note: If you cannot easily read the text below, or you prefer to
    receive Secrecy News in another format, please reply to this email to let
    us know.

    SECRECY NEWS
    from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
    Volume 2013, Issue No. 43
    May 1, 2013

    Secrecy News Blog: http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/


    ** SEQUESTRATION SLOWS DOCUMENT DECLASSIFICATION
    ** EGYPT AND THE IMF, AND MORE FROM CRS
    ** INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS, AND MORE FROM CRS


    SEQUESTRATION SLOWS DOCUMENT DECLASSIFICATION

    The process of declassifying national security records, which is hardly
    expeditious under the best of circumstances, will become slower as a result
    of the mandatory budget cuts known as sequestration.

    Due to sequestration, "NARA has reduced funding dedicated to the
    declassification of Presidential records," the National Archives and
    Records Administration (NARA) said in a report last week.

    "Instead, NARA staff will prepare documents for declassification, in
    addition to their existing duties. This will slow declassification
    processes and delay other work, including FOIA responses and special access
    requests," said the new report, which also identified several other adverse
    effects of the across-the-board cuts.

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2013/04/nara-seq.pdf

    Meanwhile, because of the basic asymmetry between classification and
    declassification, there is no particular reason to expect a corresponding
    reduction in the rate at which new records are classified.
    Classification is an integral part of the production of new national
    security information that cannot be deferred, while declassification is a
    distinct process that can easily be put on hold. Likewise, there is no
    dedicated budget for "classification" to cut in the way that NARA has cut
    declassification spending. And while Congress has erected barriers to
    declassification (such as the Kyl-Lott Amendment to prohibit automatic
    declassification of records without review), it has simultaneously allowed
    declassification requirements to go overlooked and unenforced.

    Some declassification is actually mandated by law. A 1991 statute on the
    Foreign Relations of the United States series requires the Department of
    State to publish a "thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of
    major United States foreign policy decisions" no later than 30 years after
    the fact, necessitating the timely declassification of the underlying
    records. But law or no law, the government has not complied with this
    publication schedule.


    EGYPT AND THE IMF, AND MORE FROM CRS

    A new report from the Congressional Research Service assesses the economic
    state of post-revolution Egypt and finds it fairly grim.

    "After more than two years of social unrest and economic stagnation
    following the 2011 popular uprising, the government of Egypt is facing
    serious economic pressures that, if not remedied, could lead to economic
    collapse and possibly new levels of violence," the report says.

    "Egyptian authorities and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have been
    in negotiations for more than two years over an IMF loan to Egypt in
    exchange for policy reforms that, if successful, could stave off economic
    collapse and create more 'inclusive' growth.... [but] No agreement has been
    finalized or implemented to date. Egyptian authorities have been reluctant
    to commit to economic reforms that may be politically unpopular and
    increase the country's debt."

    Background on the negotiations and on U.S. aid to Egypt are presented in
    Egypt and the IMF: Overview and Issues for Congress, April 29, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R43053.pdf

    Some other CRS reports on Middle Eastern countries that have been recently
    updated include the following.

    Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights, April 26, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS21968.pdf

    Iran Sanctions, April 24, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS20871.pdf

    U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel, April 11, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

    Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses, April 4, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL32048.pdf

    Jordan: Background and U.S. Relations, April 1, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33546.pdf


    INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS, AND MORE FROM CRS

    The international agreements that constitute the infrastructure of
    international trade and investment are spotlighted in an informative new
    report from the Congressional Research Service.

    "In the absence of an overarching multilateral framework on investment,
    bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and investment chapters in free trade
    agreements (FTAs), collectively referred to as 'international investment
    agreements,' have emerged as the primary mechanism for promoting a
    rules-based system for international investment," the new report explains.

    "Presently, there are over 3,000 BITs globally. The United States has
    concluded 47 BITs, 41 of which have entered into force." These treaties
    were tabulated by CRS and presented along with other little-known data on
    the subject in U.S. International Investment Agreements: Issues for
    Congress, April 29, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R43052.pdf

    Other new or newly updated CRS reports obtained by Secrecy News include
    the following.

    Mountaintop Mining: Background on Current Controversies, April 29, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21421.pdf

    National Park System: Establishing New Units, April 25, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS20158.pdf

    The Administrative Process by Which Groups May Be Acknowledged as Indian
    Tribes by the Department of the Interior, April 26, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43051.pdf

    Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Reform: An Overview of
    Proposals to Reduce the Growth in SSDI Rolls, April 29, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43054.pdf

    Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles:
    Background and Issues, April 26, 2013:

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R41464.pdf


    _______________________________________________
    Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
    Federation of American Scientists.

    The Secrecy News Blog is at:
    http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

    To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
    http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/subscribe/

    To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
    http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/unsubscribe/

    OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org

    Secrecy News is archived at:
    http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

    Support the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation:
    https://members.fas.org/donate


    _________________

    "This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.



    Rue she said Protection
    Rooster's Crow Confusion
    One thing else to end the deed --
    A dog with no Illusion.

    ~ Walter Wangerin Jr., Book of the Dun Cow

      Current date/time is Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:55 am