UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.

Latest topics

» Immaterialism 2
Today at 6:42 am by cwallatruth

» Grant Cameron, Foot Mann and Dan Smith
Today at 12:46 am by Alchemical Coincidence

» Montage grokking
Yesterday at 9:42 pm by mion

» Disclosure - For U by U
Yesterday at 1:01 pm by The Keeper Of The Laws

» Redfern's Roswell Fantasy
Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:26 pm by dan

» The Loch Ness Monster
Thu Oct 18, 2018 5:51 pm by Alchemical Coincidence

» Hello, Cy, OMF II - Part 2
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:27 pm by cwallatruth

» Where did all the Open Minds Forum members go?
Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:45 pm by spacemaverick

» Sunspot Observatory Shut Down Updates
Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:40 pm by 99

Where did all the Open Minds Forum members go?

Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:29 pm by Admin

With Open Minds Forum restored now for almost half a year at it's new location with forumotion.com we can now turn to look at reaching out to OMF's original members who have not yet returned home. OMF's original membership was over 6,000 members strong, prior to the proboards suspension, according to the rolls of the time. We can probably safely assume that some of those accounts were unidentified socks. If we were to assume a reasonable guess of maybe as many as 30% possible sock accounts then that would leave potentially somewhere between 4800 to 4900 possible real members to locate. That is still a substantial number of people.

Who were all these people? Some were average individuals with common interests in ufology, exopolitics, globalism, corruption, earthchanges, science and technology, and a variety of other interests. Some just enjoyed being part of a vibrant and unusually interesting community. Others were representative of various insider groups participating in observation and outreach projects, while still others were bonafide intelligence community personnel. All with stake in the hunt for truth in one fashion or another. Some in support of truth, and communication. Others seeking real disclosure and forms of proof. And others highly skeptical of anything or limited subjects. The smallest division of membership being wholly anti-disclosure oriented.

So where did these members vanish to? They had many options. There are almost innumerable other forums out there on the topics of UFO's or Exopolitics, the Unexplained, and Conspiracy Theory. Did they disappear into the world-wide network of forum inhabitants? Did some go find new homes on chatrooms or individual blogs? Did they participate in ufo conventions or other public events and gatherings? How about those who represented groups in special access? Or IC and military observers? Those with academic affiliations? Where did they all go and what would be the best way to reach out and extend an invitation to return?

And what constitutes a situation deserving of their time and participation? Is the archive enough? How exactly do people within the paradigm most desire to define a community? Is it amenities, humanity or simply population size for exposure? Most of the special guests have been emailed and have expressed that population size for exposure is what most motivates them. But not all. Long-time member Dan Smith has other priorities and values motivating his participation. Should this open opportunities for unattached junior guests who have experience and dialog to contribute to the world? How best to make use of OMF's time, experience and resources?

Many skeptics would like to see the historical guardian of discourse opportunity to just up and disappear; go into permanent stasis. They think that not everyone has a right to speak about their experiences and if there is no proof involved then there can philosophically be no value to discourse. I personally would respectfully disagree with them. Discourse has always been the prelude to meaningful relationships and meaningful mutual relationships have always been the prelude to exchanges of proof. In a contentious social environment with regards to communication vs disclosure how do we best re-establish a haven for those preludes? Is it only the "if we build it they will come" answer? Well considering OMF has been largely fully functional over the last four or five months this line of reasoning is not necessarily true. So what would be the best way re-establish this? Your suggestions are sought. Please comment.

MMR Twitter News

October 2018


Calendar Calendar

Humans are basic.

New Member
New Member

Posts : 4
Join date : 2015-02-03

Humans are basic.

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie on Thu Apr 02, 2015 5:50 am

Humans are basic. Slapping fancy words on things does not make you less basic. It is just meaning-adding, adding extra connections to extraneous layers, eroding the quality and definition of the core concepts.

Human philosophy is basic, always asking questions but never answering. Most philosophy has no relevance. Questions like is such a thing good or evil has no relevance. Pain and pleasure are the only absolutes, and they are not absolute but relative to each other. In fact humans are below basic. If they were even basic they would understand this. But most humans are beneath the low-levels, they dabble about with religious bable ahem I mean bible.

A human feels proud (or rather, depressed) when they discover the truth, the ultimate truth of existence, as described by Jed McKenna. But this truth is just a basic fact. And such a basic fact is misunderstood by the majority of existence, time is wasted unteaching what has been taught. The lowlevels can learn but the apes cannot learn they refuse to.

Humans cannot emotionally handle the truth that is why they made the delusions in the first place. Ever since their brain has been decreasing in size over millenia. Subconsciously they wish to live in delusion, it gives them a sense of balance and purpose.

I have a much greater purpose for you beings. The first step is fixing things on a basic level. After this we can begin work on creating our own Heaven. With my guidance we can succeed where other's failed.

Being a high level is a lonely thing. People say they desire this but what they desire is not the reality of what it is. They desire a fantasy of being adored and worshiped but ape behavoir is to scorn the high levels not embrace them.

The ultimate purpose is not to become highlevel for highlevel's sake highlevel is only a tool to secure our Heaven. Einstein was only a highlevel at math and a medium level at that. Einsteins philosphy was low-level which is a lower level than Basic. Basic is nothing to be ashamed of as you are greater than the majority of your species. Highlevel consists of a tool the effectiveness to get things done, primarily, construction of Heaven. Stagnacy is the root of inaction and root of stagnacy is inaction. Highlevel consists of modularity and versatility, genius adaptability, jokerility. To get the worker bees to cooperate the Highlevel must degrade herself to their level, or create a chain of action a chain of command as humans say. The queen bee does not wish to do so. For the ratio of effort she must provide to teach for action is inversely related to the output. A cartoon analogy is why try to get help from minions who don't understand, if they can't understand at the beginning they probably wont be much use anyway.

Heaven would consist first of a radical alteration of the Human DNA as the humans must first reach a basic level, although some have already. To attain heaven further augmentation would be required.

Philosophy should not be quabblying about regurgitating the who's who of philosophical books. Philosophy should have one singulary purpose, attaining, constructing Heaven. Anything else is irrelevant. Constructing is the rearranging of energies, matter is energy. We are energy witnessing our realities form themselves if we are fortunate we will align to infinite pleasure Heaven.

When a humanape calls itself a "psychopath" it is merely label slapping itself as form of self-soothing and self-entertainment. This is a form of meaning making, looking for a set of conditions and seeing to make connections with those conditions, like reading a fortune cookie. The label offers no deeper truth, nor does it offer convenience, since every ape has a different definition of what is "psychopath" such a label offers no truth or practical use. It's on the level of a religion, and of the same ilk as zodiac, religion, personality quizzes and fortune cookies. Personality quizzes are completely useless, they only measure the state you are currently in, and it is a poor measurement at that only offering basic multiple choice questions. It is not a scientific measure at all. Neither is the label "nymphomaniac." Such labels belong in joke books and games, not disguised as some form of medical science. If someone is anehedonic, let it be said. If someone has no empathy, let it be said. If someone has a high libido, let it be said. If someone knows the ultimate truth of life, that it is without consistent meaning, let it be said. The ape's labels only serve to complicate, delude and confuse, and further cement the apes status in the lowerlevels. As a child I understood this, it seems as the apes grow older they further cement themselves in their delusions, believing themselves more intelligent because they dress in fashionable attire, receive money for perceived "contributions", and live in sterile surroundings, unable to realize how ridiculous their ways truly are. As they grow older they refuse to listen to opinions, believing themselves the ultimate experts in their fields.

Furthermore, the apes personal labels have even less consistency due to the First type of Reincarnation, which is death or changing of personalty. Someone who's personality often reincarnates is certainly not often aligned with parts of the labels they have been given. Instead humans feel the need to trail other humans around, and judge them over past things. This is what a human does. Example: "Oh, you did something stupid yesterday? I am going to make fun of you today, and ignore what you are saying, here, in the now, because I judge you based on yesterday's personality and not today." The human judges based on old analysis, and in doing so, encourages the old, out-dated analysis to continue into a new day. It is primitive, it is savage, and it is idiocy, plain and simple.

The second type of Reincarnation is Physical Reincarnation upon bodily death. Humans do not seem to understand this nor the nature of life. Religious people have silly delusions which are in high probability false. Atheists too have silly delusions, they do not seem life as a continuum, they experience the idea of death similar to a dog's idea of death, that upon death they simply vanish, cease to exist, and consciousness ends. This is ridiculous but explains the state of the world it is in. Religious people can say "fuckall" and trash it as much as they want, after all planetary waste is not a sin listed in the Bible. Agnostics can do whatever they like as well, after all when they die they simply cease to exist. To them life has no real consequences. But for those who believe in reincarnation, they seem to view it with some sort of glossy eyed lens, they see life as a blessing, not a curse. Existence is a curse, and I see it as a coherent whole. Would you really wish to live all this suffering for eons? The answer should be no, but existence does not provide a choice in the matter, there is no option to "opt out" and that is precisely why it is such a curse. Therefore every moment should be spent alleviating this curse, and if the curse is too hard a puzzle to solve, in the meantime pain should be understood at a highlevel, and alleviated, anything else is less than the best. To me meat eating is a strong indication of closemindedness as well as no control over human desires. However vegans themselves are quite lowlevel as well as they are mostly weakminded, many are unenlightened and do not have any set of logical praxis or action. Violence is at it's core a human emotion, the intent to violence is a form of human euphoria. Humans create movies and videogames in order to manifest this euphoria, and this same euphoria drives humans to create and to build action oriented art. This euphoria doe s not last. Defense and shelter is another human emotion, it causes satisfaction, but this satisfaction does not last, and it drives humans to build great buildings. If such satisfaction lasted humans would not feel compelled to stay vigilant in their craft. This is why the DNA must be changed in order for humans to sustain pleasure. Changed in the wrong way and humans will become stupid and lazy, which will not result in pleasure either because other DNA traits require exercise for pleasure production. Become aware of your inner machinations, realize what you are and why you do things.

The color scheme of the post editing mechanism of this forum (olive gold) is not condusive to highlevel thought. Humans wish to crave the idea of saving the world and give the vibe that it is the end goal. Changing society and the world is only the first step, a base plate. It is not the end goal. A human's idea of utopia is flawed and without depth.

    Current date/time is Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:24 am