Open Minds Forum

UFOs, Extraterrestrial Contact, Conspiracy, Exopolitics, Geopolitics, Paranormal, Crypto-zoology, Ancient History, Cutting-Edge Science & Special Guests.

Latest topics

» Immaterialism 5
Today at 8:05 pm by Foot Mann

» Montage grokking
Yesterday at 11:54 am by mion

» Livin Your Best Life
Yesterday at 9:09 am by smelly

» Disclosure - For U by U
Yesterday at 8:40 am by Reptile

» 5G phased ray antennae
Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:17 am by hobbit

» The Ron & Joe Disinfo Show
Thu Feb 07, 2019 7:46 am by GrandCru

» Top Harvard Astronomer: Alien Ship May Be Among Us
Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:27 am by 99

» GH introduction
Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:16 am by GH

» Hobbit my little friend
Sat Feb 02, 2019 10:03 pm by smelly

Where did all the Open Minds Forum members go?

Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:29 pm by Admin

With Open Minds Forum restored now for almost half a year at it's new location with forumotion.com we can now turn to look at reaching out to OMF's original members who have not yet returned home. OMF's original membership was over 6,000 members strong, prior to the proboards suspension, according to the rolls of the time. We can probably safely assume that some of those accounts were unidentified socks. If we were to assume a reasonable guess of maybe as many as 30% possible sock accounts then that would leave potentially somewhere between 4800 to 4900 possible real members to locate. That is still a substantial number of people.

Who were all these people? Some were average individuals with common interests in ufology, exopolitics, globalism, corruption, earthchanges, science and technology, and a variety of other interests. Some just enjoyed being part of a vibrant and unusually interesting community. Others were representative of various insider groups participating in observation and outreach projects, while still others were bonafide intelligence community personnel. All with stake in the hunt for truth in one fashion or another. Some in support of truth, and communication. Others seeking real disclosure and forms of proof. And others highly skeptical of anything or limited subjects. The smallest division of membership being wholly anti-disclosure oriented.

So where did these members vanish to? They had many options. There are almost innumerable other forums out there on the topics of UFO's or Exopolitics, the Unexplained, and Conspiracy Theory. Did they disappear into the world-wide network of forum inhabitants? Did some go find new homes on chatrooms or individual blogs? Did they participate in ufo conventions or other public events and gatherings? How about those who represented groups in special access? Or IC and military observers? Those with academic affiliations? Where did they all go and what would be the best way to reach out and extend an invitation to return?

And what constitutes a situation deserving of their time and participation? Is the archive enough? How exactly do people within the paradigm most desire to define a community? Is it amenities, humanity or simply population size for exposure? Most of the special guests have been emailed and have expressed that population size for exposure is what most motivates them. But not all. Long-time member Dan Smith has other priorities and values motivating his participation. Should this open opportunities for unattached junior guests who have experience and dialog to contribute to the world? How best to make use of OMF's time, experience and resources?

Many skeptics would like to see the historical guardian of discourse opportunity to just up and disappear; go into permanent stasis. They think that not everyone has a right to speak about their experiences and if there is no proof involved then there can philosophically be no value to discourse. I personally would respectfully disagree with them. Discourse has always been the prelude to meaningful relationships and meaningful mutual relationships have always been the prelude to exchanges of proof. In a contentious social environment with regards to communication vs disclosure how do we best re-establish a haven for those preludes? Is it only the "if we build it they will come" answer? Well considering OMF has been largely fully functional over the last four or five months this line of reasoning is not necessarily true. So what would be the best way re-establish this? Your suggestions are sought. Please comment.





MMR Twitter News

February 2019

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Calendar Calendar


United Nations eSubscription Service

Share
Cyrellys
Cyrellys
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1596
Join date : 2012-04-25
Age : 48
Location : Montana

United Nations eSubscription Service

Post by Cyrellys on Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:08 am

Journal No.2014/46, Saturday, 8 March 2014
Inbox
x

United Nations eSubscription Service eSubscription@un.org via google.com
5:04 AM (2 hours ago)

to me
Journal No.2014/46, Saturday, 8 March 2014
Journal No.2014/46, Saturday, 8 March 2014
Posted: 08 Mar 2014 04:00 AM PST
PROGRAMME OF MEETINGS AND AGENDA
Size: 372K
Publication Date: Saturday, 8 March 2014
[ English (372K) | French (394K) ]


_________________

"This is an indeterminite problem. How shall I solve it? Pessimistically? Or optimistically? Or a range of probabilities expressed as a curve, or several curves?..........Well.....we're Loonies. Loonies bet. Hell, we have to! They shipped us up and bet us we couldn't stay alive. We fooled 'em. We'll fool 'em again!" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.



Rue she said Protection
Rooster's Crow Confusion
One thing else to end the deed --
A dog with no Illusion.

~ Walter Wangerin Jr., Book of the Dun Cow

    Current date/time is Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:12 pm