Rose Rosetta wrote:I have mixed feelings about Obama. At times it seems he's aligned himself with the Saudis, other times it seems he refuses to be pushed into war (Syria, Iran). A part of me believes he's doing all this spending intentionally (VAT attack) or so we can't afford endless war.
If he really believed spending us into oblivion was a good idea. Well, it's backfired on him.
I'm not sitting any fence wrt O. I think the Bengazi debacle painted the clearest view of him and Clinton that can be found anywhere. Stevens was deliberately murdered in my opinion because O & Clinton had him gun running weapons to the Syrian rebels, and the cat was out of the bag. Two top mil's lost their careers over that because they were going in to rescue the guy and the Administration had the lower officers relieve them of duty to prevent it. No rescue for any "angel down" even though we had guys in reach of the area.
I heard through the grapevine that in the wake of that O was furious about being blocked from starting something with Syria. They needed that conflict, as the tale went, so they could pull another wave of prospective "constitutionals" from over here into a fresh theater. These are the ones who are mil who won't follow orders to shoot civilians in a martial law scenario.
Shrug. And then three Oathkeepers discovered what they did with those glass makers that infowars reported pulled from that TX base & sent to SC. There was an earthquake off the coast of SC in suitably deep water, far enough out they could call it natural. And then shortly after the Admin purged those three for the most innocuous reasons.
The extreme spending is what you do when you want to put a nation in a proverbial straight jacket and empty all remaining coffers so you can grab tangibles because the losers are forced to sell on the fly. In order to shut the financial system down they have to drain every last iota from it. And at the same time be ready to control a panicking population.
What is still up in the air is if an external factor, i.e. dark star, nibiru, et, asteroid, cometary fragment, etc etc is in the mix here. The tales are all over the board and nothing concrete. But the under the table depopulation talk says there's something in there. Perhaps it will be biological. I think those running this nightmare have many options sitting on the table.
Whether they can do anything successfully remains a matter of those awake catching them at it in time. Smoke and mirrors.
One thing to bear in mind when looking at a tool in the box (O), is you can usually identify it by the attached "fail-safe". A fail-safe gets employed if the opposition gets a dose of utilizable transparency. What is "O's" fail-safe? Of course all that birther rumor/conspiracy theory...oops. It's not what someone knows but how effective the knower is. You can walk on water through hell if hell can't be touched or disturbed while you do it.
If truth is ever fully successful, and we ever have the real ability to straighten out this whole mess, they will sacrifice O to the birthers to protect those telling him how high to jump behind him. Watch Jarrett.