Uncommon Thoughts on Common Things - Cyrellys

OBAMA WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM REQUIRES WHISTLEBLOWERS TO REGISTER TO BE PROTECTED

SOURCE: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Obama_Whistleblower_Program_Requires_Whistleblowers_to_Register_to_be_Protected/34534/0/0/0/Y/M.html

SOURCE: ALL GOV.

Are whistleblowers—whose anonymity is often their best protection against retribution—made safer by being forced to register as whistleblowers with the U.S. government? Or are they being placed in greater danger?

The Obama administration is demanding they step forward and sign up.

Indeed, exposing government corruption or other wrongdoing often means being discreet, if not anonymous, on the part of the individuals blowing the whistle, unless they want to face retribution from higher-ups involved in the misdeeds. Keeping one’s identity hidden is almost always essential for whistleblowers because of managers’ or executives’ impulse to protect themselves and punish those exposing their mistakes. Thus, any government program that requires whistleblowers to reveal themselves—ostensibly for their own good—might seem disingenuous, if not counterproductive to encouraging workers to expose law breakers.

But the Obama administration is taking this approach by mandating that government employees register as official whistleblowers under the Insider Threat program it established three years ago. This program was adopted, the president said, to protect against internal dangers lurking within federal agencies.

One of the biggest supporters on Capitol Hill of government whistleblowing says the Obama program’s registration requirement is a terrible idea and antithetical to the importance of whistleblowers coming forward.

Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who coauthored the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (pdf), addressed the U.S. Senate recently to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the landmark bill. During his speech, Grassley criticized Insider Threat’s effort to expose whistleblowers, citing the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as a prime concern.

The Republican senator said he’s been trying for months to get the FBI to share its Insider Threat training materials. But the bureau has steadfastly refused.

At one point, the FBI’s top Insider Threat official agreed to meet with Grassley and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) to discuss how the bureau was training its people to

“distinguish between true insider threats and legitimate whistleblowers.”

The official, according to Grassley’s speech, told them not to worry about the training materials, which they had failed to bring along to the meeting.

“He said whistleblowers had to register in order to be protected, and the Insider Threat Program would know to just avoid those people,” Grassley said in his speech.

The official then “abruptly walked out” of the meeting after being there only 10 minutes.

“These are clearly not the actions of an agency that is genuinely open to whistleblowers or whistleblower protection,” Grassley stated.

The senator, who has served in Congress since 1975, added that Obama’s registration requirement was an idea that “should be pretty alarming to all Americans. Sometimes confidentiality is the best protection a whistleblower has.”

-Noel Brinkerhoff

To Learn More:

Chuck Grassley: Insider Threat Program Poses Threat to Whistleblowers (Emptywheel)

Grassley Talks About the Anniversary of the Whistleblower Protection Act (Senator Charles Grassley)

Terrorists, Spies, Whistleblowers Treated the Same by Obama Administration (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)

Obama Anti-Whistleblower Program Requires Federal Employees to Report Suspicions of other Employees or Risk Punishment (by Noel Brinkerhoff and Danny Biederman, AllGov)

This is Brilliant writing....http://taxicabdepressions.com/?p=1193 Article aptly titled THE PIG TRAP

I first publicly remarked much the same as Taxi Hack, right here on OMFv.1 back in 2008; back before it rose to its current crescendo. I don't warn anymore. I know precisely what comes this way. I just watch.

Cy

Aside from pattern discussion here:  http://openmindsforum.forumotion.com/t200-malaysia-flight-370-disappears#5335


There is this:

America Conservative 2 Conservative mail@americac2c.com via americac2c.ning.com
8:54 AM (45 minutes ago)

to me

Congress Initiates Obama’s Impeachment
by clyde
URL: http://wp.me/p2Jq2P-gNm
While many have speculated over the potential of impeaching Pres. Barack Obama, several members of Congress have finally filed.
A resolution written by Rep. Tom Rice (R-SC) claims Obama should be impeached for his defiance against the Constitution. The congressman officially stated the purpose of initiating the impeachment process was to “bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.”
The most recent and notable Constitutional defiance included a range of offenses regarding the Affordable Care Act. The president has changed the language of the law as well as, processes of implementation without the consent of Congress.
RELATED: Will Obama Force Congress To Let Him Run For Illegal 3rd Term?
Rice wrote, “President Obama has adopted a practice of picking and choosing which laws he wants to enforce. In most cases, his laws of choice conveniently coincide with his Administration’s political agenda. Our Founding Fathers created the Executive Branch to implement and enforce the laws written by Congress and vested this power in the President. However, President Obama has chosen to ignore some of the laws written by Congress and implemented by preceding Presidents.”
So far, the impeachment proceedings have garnered support from 29 members of Congress.
Here is a list of those supporting Pres. Obama’s impeachment: Bachmann (MN), Bridenstine (OK), Chaffetz (UT), J. Duncan (SC), DeSantis (FL), Franks (AZ), Gowdy (SC), Harris (MD), Lamborn (CO), LaMalfa (CA), Marino (PA), McClintock (CA), Meadows (NC), Nunnelee (MS), Pittenger (NC), Posey (FL), Tom Price (GA), Ribble (WI), Salmon (AZ), Sanford (SC), Schweikert (AZ), Stewart (UT), Stockman (TX), Walberg (MI), Weber (TX), Wenstrup (OH), Williams (TX), Joe Wilson (SC), and Yoho (FL).
http://americanoverlook.com/congress-initiates-president-obamas-imp...

Eric Holder Impeachment Proceedings Begin
by clyde
URL: http://wp.me/p2Jq2P-gPL
Republicans have officially moved to impeach Attorney General Eric Holder.
Yesterday, Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX) introduced an Articles of Impeachment resolution against Holder for his involvement in many of Pres. Barack Obama’s scandals, including Operation Fast and Furious.
There are a total of eight congressmen currently supporting the resolution—
Larry Bucshon (R-IN)
Blake Farenthold (R-TX)
Phil Roe (R-TN)
Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA)
Roger Williams (R-TX)
Ted Yoho (R-FL)
Randy Weber (R-TX)


*****

"Cuchulainn saw in the distance over the heads
of the four provinces of Ireland the fiery flickering
of gold weapons in the evening sunset clouds."

-- From The Tain Bo Cuailnge (IX - The Pact is Broken)

Cyrellys

Rumour?: U.S. Chief Justice Roberts “Signed Off On Interpol To Arrest And Remove Obama on 25 Charges of Treason”.
Saturday, April 19, 2014 23:19

Source:  http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2014/04/rumor-u-s-chief-justice-roberts-signed-off-on-interpol-to-arrest-and-remove-obama-on-25-charges-of-treason-2615324.html

(Before It's News)
See also Editor’s Pick Beforeitsnews/alert-obama-coup-detat-come-easter-sunday

“Since obama reneged on his resignation, all offers of safe haven throughout the world have been removed.
“Obama will be prosecuted for multiple counts of treason to the fullest extent.”
Charges of Treason against Obama including 2nd Amendment infringements, declaring war without consent of Congress and misuse of Posse Comitatus in the Bundly Land Management case…
Picture: John Roberts

Obama took the Presidential Oath, swearing to “.. preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” but has: Article 1, Sect. 1
1. Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.
3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration – Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress.
4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated. Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments. White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009
5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.
6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress
Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,
8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a felony.
9. Attempt to tax political contributions –
1st. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article I Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7
10. Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Law – Obama directed DOJ ( Dept. of Justice ) to ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce the law.
Violations:
Article III, Section 3 – Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained. White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009
11. Drone strikes on American Citizens – 5th Amendment Due process Rights negated.
Article II Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
[The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917) ] 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241
Violations : Art. 2 sect.2 , 5th amendment, 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241
12. Bypassed Congress and gave EPA power to advance Cap-n-Trade
Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Violations: Art. 1 Sect. 1
13. Attempt for Graphic tobacco warnings (under appeal) –
Art. 1 sect. 8 Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; (see list)
1st Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Violations: 1st Amendment. Art. 1 sect. 8
14. Four Executive appointments – Senate was NOT in recess (Court has ruled unconstitutional yet the appointees still remain)
Art. 1 sect 2 Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
Art. 1 sect . 5 Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.
Violations: Art. 1 sect 2 & 5 ,
15. Obama took Chairmanship of UN Security Council -
Art 1 Sect. 9. Section 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Violation : Art 1 Sect. 9.
16. Obamacare ( A.C.A. ) mandate – SCOTUS (U.S. SupremeCourt ) had to make it a tax because there is no Constitutional authority.
Art. 2 sect. 1 Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Violations : Art. 2 sect. 1 , Amendments 1, 2, 9, 10, & 14, Art. 1 sect. 7
18. Healthcare waivers – No president has dispensing powers
1st. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
2nd. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
9th. The enumeration in the Constitution (narrative), of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
10th. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
14th. The Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal protection for all citizens, was necessary to secure for freed slaves the same rights as whites. Simply ending slavery was not enough. Prior to the Civil War, it was automatic in many states to treat blacks, whatever their status, as second-class citizens. A ruling by a court in Virginia in 1824 stated, without any effort at dissimulation, that, “And, yet, nobody has ever questioned the power of the legislature to deny to free blacks and mulattoes one of the fist privileges of a citizen — that of voting at election.”
Art 1: Sect. 7 All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Violations: 1st, 2, 9,10, & 14th Amendment, Art 1: Sect. 7
19. Refuses to acknowledge state’s 10th Amendment rights to nullify Obamacare ( Affordable Care Act ) .
Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Violation: Art. 1 sect. 1 , Art. 2. sect. 1 , 10th Amendment
20. Congress did not approve Obama’s war in Libya. Article I, Section 8, First illegal war U.S. has engaged in. Impeachable under Article II, Section 4. Obama falsely claims UN can usurp Congressional war powers.
Violations: Article I, Section 8, Art.2 sect. 1
21. Obama has acted outside the constitutional power given him – this in itself is unconstitutional.
Violations: Art. 2 sect 1
22. With the approval of Obama, the NSA and the FBI are tapping directly into the servers of 9 internet companies to gain access to emails, video/audio, photos, documents, etc. This program is code named PRISM. NSA also collecting data on all phone calls in U.S. Violation of 4th Amendment.
Violations: 4th Amendment.
23. Plans to sign U.N. Firearms treaty – 2nd Amendment.
Violation: 2nd ,4th, 9th, 10th , & 14TH Amendment, Art.1 Sect. 4 , Art. 2 sect. 1
24. The Senate/Obama immigration bill (approved by both) raises revenue – Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;
Violations: Art. 1 sect 4th, 7 , & 8th, Art. 2 sect. 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,
25. Obama refuses to uphold the Business Mandate Law (ACA) for a year. President does not have that authority – Article. I. Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. The president ”shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed” Article II, Section 3. posted on popular forum tonight
Posted by Midwest at 1:42 am
http://dinartruthmatrix.net/
Posted by John MacHaffie at 10:09 PM
intel-rumors-update-4-18-judge-roberts-signed-off-on-interpol-to-arrest-and-remove-obama-action-expected-this-weekend

*********


Bundy Ranch: Martial Law Prelude – FEMA Source – FEDS Hope For ‘Event’
Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:36

Source: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/04/bundy-ranch-martial-law-prelude-more-planned-this-year-fema-source-2942950.html

(Before It's News) Posted by Live Free or Die

According to John Moore’s FEMA source, the US govt’s beta-test at Bundy Ranch will be followed up by several more this year in America. Building up as a prelude to martial law, we’re warned the FEDS won’t back down so easily the next time as the govt is hoping for some kind of ‘event’ where they can institute martial law and further crack down upon the masses.

Sharing that Bundy Ranch gave the federal government the opportunity to test most of their electronic surveillance systems under real-time conditions, those who are paying attention can see that the DHS order of 25 million more rounds of shotgun shells and America being sold down the river to China are all related to the eventual ‘end of America’ and the NWO making war upon the American people.


******

More: http://openmindsforum.forumotion.com/t200p15-malaysia-flight-370-disappears#5337

Cy Commentary: on the email below regarding Podesta Group, Ukraine and BP

WE watching the fantastic end of the pool know where Podesta stands wrt Contact.  With that lens it is interesting to regard the players involved in the latest hijinx especially when we take into account the events of January and February back channel internet discussion between comm assets.  (see my posts from that period).

The email I recvd this morning gives a view of the connection to the Ukraine situation.  See below enclosed.

So when you look up Viktor Yanukovich you get an additional viewing point of the latest games.  It's like a who's who of the January/February events.  

One of the things that caught my eye was mention of Yulia Tymoshenko, who was recently the subject of a leaked conversation in which she is heard making a statement about nuking 8 million Russians in the Ukraine and then attempted claiming she didn't say that via Twitter.  http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/04/yulia-tymoshenko-caught-in-the-act-2930004.htm  l

Stephen Lendman quoting Yulia Tymoshenko leaked conversation in Article from TheSleuthJournal wrote:If she was in charge, she said, “there would be no f…ing way that they would get Crimea then.”


Shufrych said Ukraine “didn’t have any force potential” to keep Crimea. Tymoshenko said she would have found “a way to kill those katsaps.”


“I hope I will be able to get all my connections involved. And I will use all of my means to make the entire world raise up, so that there wouldn’t be even a scorched field left in Russia,” she added.


Referring to Putin, she said she’s ready to “grab a machine gun and shoot that m…erf…er in the head.”

Wikipedia excerpt on Yanukovich wrote:Presidency (2010–2014)[edit]
Inauguration[edit]
Ukraine's parliament had (on 16 February) fixed 25 February 2010 for the inauguration of Yanukovych as president.^[58] Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenkosigned a decree endorsing a plan of events related to Yanukovych's inauguration on 20 February 2010.^[59] Yushchenko also congratulated and wished Yanukovych "to defend Ukrainian interests and democratic traditions" at the presidential post.^[60]
Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Rus at Yanukovych's invitation conducted a public prayer service at Kiev Pechersk Lavra before Yanukovych's presidential inauguration.^[61] Patriarch Kirill also attended the inauguration^[62] along with High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton, United States National Security Advisor James Jones and speaker of the Russian parliament Boris Gryzlov.^[63][64]
Yanukovych's immediate predecessor, Yushchenko, did not attend the ceremony, nor did the Prime Minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, and her party, Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko.^[65]
The event was attended by many foreign dignitaries.^[66]
First days[edit]
On 3 March 2010, Yanukovych suspended his membership in the Party of Regions as he was barred by the Constitutionfrom heading a political party while president,^[67] and handed over leadership in the party and its parliamentary faction toMykola Azarov.^[68]
On new alliances
Yanukovych said, "Ukraine's integration with the EU remains our strategic aim", with a "balanced policy, which will protect our national interests both on our eastern border – I mean with Russia – and of course with the European Union".^[69][70]According to Yanukovych, Ukraine must be a "Neutral state" which should be part of a "collective defence system which the European Union, NATO and Russia will take part in." Yanukovych wants Ukraine to "neither join NATO nor the CSTO".^[71] He stated on 7 January 2010 that Ukraine is ready to consider an initiative by Dmitry Medvedev on the creation of a new Europe collective security system^[71] stating "And we're ready to back Russia's and France's initiatives".^[72] Yanukovych stated during the 2010 presidential election-campaign that the current level of Ukraine's cooperation with NATO is sufficient and that the question of the country's accession to the alliance is therefore not urgent.^[72] "The Ukrainian people don't currently support Ukraine's entry to NATO and this corresponds to the status that we currently have. We don't want to join any military bloc".^[72] On 27 May 2010 President Yanukovych stated he considered Ukraine's relations with NATO as a partnership, "And Ukraine can't live without this [partnership], because Ukraine is a large country".^[73]
In early November 2011, Yankukovych claimed that "arms are being bought in the country and armed attacks on government agencies are being prepared."^[74] These claims were met with disbelief.^[74]

From Cy's Email wrote:RE: Podesta Group and Ukraine and BP

Sir David <----------->
11:44 PM (11 hours ago)

to
Here is an interesting list as to who is who in criminal activity.
For those, who do not know the Clintonistas control Wal-Mart.
And then look at what is stated about Ukraine.
There is a lot of money exchanging hands, listed below.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Podesta Group and Ukraine and BP
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:47:32 -0400
From: robert
To: sirdavid@---------

Podesta Group – Tony and John

The Podesta Group is a lobbying and public affairs firm based in Washington, D.C.. It was founded in 1988 by brothers John Podesta and Tony Podesta and has previously been known as Podesta Associates, podesta.com and PodestaMattoon.[1][2][3] The firm most recently reorganized in January 2007 after current Chairman Tony Podesta split with former business partner Dan Mattoon.[4]

Podesta Group represents U.S. corporations, as well as non-profits, associations and governments.[5] It "has close ties to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration."[6]

The firm reported earning $27.4 million in lobbying fees in 2011.[7] In 2007, Chairman Tony Podesta was ranked by his peers as the third most influential lobbyist in Washington.[8]
The Podesta Group has been retained by Wal-Mart, BP and Lockheed Martin.
They also received revenue of $900,000 over the last two years from the "European Centre for a Modern Ukraine....
Selected clients

Tony Podesta with Senator Kay Hagan and husband Chip at a 2009 party hosted by Podesta Group

The Podesta Group has been retained by Wal-Mart, BP and Lockheed Martin.[6] Other clients include Abdisalam Omer, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, Amgen, Bank Of America, Cherokee Nation (Casinos), Cintas, Covidien, Duke Energy, Egypt, Genentech, General Dynamics, Harrah's Entertainment, Heineken, Merck, Michelin, National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), National Public Radio (NPR), Nestle, Novartis, Orange County, Florida, Raytheon, Reed Elsevier, Republic of Albania, Republic of Georgia, Sallie Mae, Sunoco, Synthetic Genomics, TJX Companies, Tyco Electronics, and United Technologies.[9][10][11]

In addition, the Podesta Group acts as a lobbyist for Egypt on U.S. policies of concern, activities in Congress and the Executive branch, aThey also received revenue of $900,000 over the last two years from the "European Centre for a Modern Ukrainend developments on the U.S. political scene generally,' according to forms filed with the Justice Department in 2009."[6][12]

They also received revenue of $900,000 over the last two years from the "European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, a Brussels-based organization sympathetic to Yanukovich and his political party".[13]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_Group


0000000000000000000000000000000

August 28, 2013, 02:14 pm
Report: Top DC lobbyist Podesta retains Landrieu's husband as realtor

Sen. Mary Landrieu's (D-La.) husband is slated to benefit financially from real-estate dealings with a lobbyist whose firm often has business before the senator.
Tony Podesta, cofounder of the Podesta Group, has retained Frank Snellings, Landrieu's husband, to sell the Capitol Hill townhouse where he hosts prominent fundraisers and receptions, according to a report in the Washington Examiner.

Podesta bought the house in 2009 for $1.57 million, and Snellings served as his agent then. The house is now listed at $1.89 million, and the Examiner reports Snellings would be slated to receive a fee of around $50,000 from Podesta for the sale, according to the typical 3 percent fee due to the listing agent.
Podesta's firm has a number of clients with business before Landrieu. Its biggest client, Lockheed Martin, is one of the biggest contractors for the Department of Homeland Security — a department over which Landrieu, as chairwoman of the Appropriations Homeland Security subcommittee, has some influence.
A Landrieu aide pushed back against the suggestion that the relationship was inappropriate, however, pointing out Tony Podesta and his group have not lobbied Landrieu on BP or Lockheed Martin.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/319123-report-podesta-group-head-hires-landrieu-husband-as-realtor


0000000000000000000


Mr. Podesta still resembles the type of lobbying-connected insider that Mr. Obama claimed during his first run for president would be restrained from access to the White House. Mr. Podesta’s brother, Tony, runs a prominent D.C. lobbying firm. The two brothers founded the Podesta Group in 1987, but a representative said John Podesta hasn’t been associated with the firm since 1993, when he left to work in the Clinton White House.
Still John Podesta remains close to his brother, so much so that a recent Federal Election Commission donation record mistakenly listed him as a vice president of his brother’s firm.
Tony Podesta’s firm has experienced a business boom since Mr. Obama took office. According to information from the Center for Responsive Politics, the firm’s income went from more than $10 million in 2007 to almost $30 million by 2010. This year, revenue is estimated to be around $20 million.

The Podesta Group is retained by some top businesses and industries that have a lot to gain from favorable government policy, including BP PLC, Wal-Mart, Boeing and Lockheed Martin.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/11/john-podestas-return-to-white-house-will-test-obam/?page=all

So here is the latest wrt Hillary & Podesta strand:

Before Its News - wrote:BOMBSHELL! Former CIA Officer Testifies That Obama ‘Switched Sides’ In War On Terror In Libya
It makes a lot of difference, Hillary
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.


The Citizens Committee on Benghazi released its interim findings on April 22, 2014 in Washington. Pictured are (L-R) Clare Lopez, Admiral (Ret.) Chuck Kubic, Admiral (Ret.) James ‘Ace’ Lyons, former CIA officer Wayne Simmons and civil rights attorney John Clarke.
‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January 23 that it mattered little why the Benghazi diplomatic compound was attacked: ‘What difference, at this point, does it make?’

‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.
‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’
‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research. Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now ‘all in Syria.’ source – Daily Mail UK

The post BOMBSHELL! Former CIA Officer Testifies That Obama ‘Switched Sides’ In War On Terror In Libya appeared first on Now The End Begins.


Source: http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=19024
Source: http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2014/04/bombshell-former-cia-officer-testifies-that-obama-switched-sides-in-war-on-terror-in-libya-2458834.html

And that isn't all the other group, Obama & Co. are sending Paratroopers to a place near Ukraine  still trying to instigate WWIII which would hide the economic collapse, ties up Putin, and enable a martial law prior to unambiguous contact event enabling a potential depopulation event here in the US prior to the arrival of the ETs who said DON'T!  

http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2014/04/a-step-closer-to-ww3-obama-sends-paratroopers-to-poland-2451808.html

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-sends-troops-near-russia-as-ukraine-tensions-build-2014-04-23

http://investmentwatchblog.com/pentagon-moves-to-thwart-russia-american-troops-arrive-in-poland/

As you can see in the economic blogs above the money guys are watching this pretty closely

Billionaire Warns: Yellen Collapse 'Will Be Unlike Any Other': In a recent interview with The New York Times, he calls Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen 'ignorant' and said the Federal Reserve all but killed the economic recovery.
http://www.moneynews.com/MKTNews/economic-JanetYellen-stockbust/2014/03/26/id/561923/#ixzz2xkTF4LEuGLY

I suppose I can understand their concern since as of this date there's 28 dead bodies piled up in this wrangling with control and the old guard plans at stake - remember Quayles source V's testimony?  15 more heads to add to the pile. http://plazilla.com/page/4295131264/dead-banker-nr-17-is-belgian

• Lavrov: US should face responsibility for powers it installed in Kiev 
  
• About the Ebola outbreak  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvblnVMh2wA
  
• Reid And China Betray Clinton And Rothschild’s Over Bundy Ranch _Col. Potter
  
• Russian Warships Coming To US Backyard - Why Are They REALLY Coming Here?
  
• THE WEST MARCHES EAST: THE U.S.-NATO STRATEGY TO ISOLATE RUSSIA
  

Rules And Why They Don't Apply To You
http://www.newamericanman.com/rules-and-why-they-dont-apply-to-you/

Posted by Viper

Do you drive the speed limit?  Come to a complete stop at stop signs?  Park in a loading zone because you’ll “just be a minute”?  Pay your taxes honestly and on time?  How many other rules do you intentionally break out of a sense of convenience, entitlement, or because you deem them to be irrelevant, unjust, or inapplicable?  We all bend or break the rules our society foists on us, each and every day.  We usually do so because we think they’re “little” rules, and there won’t be any real consequence of breaking them.  Clearly, we have a mindset that allows us to pick and choose the rules we’ll abide by, as long as they’re trivial and we don’t get in trouble.
So you have to ask yourself: why do you feel okay breaking the little rules, but fear breaking the big ones?  What is it that scares you so much about taking a stand when something more than your time and convenience are at stake?  For most, it’s the consequences.  You’re unwilling to break the big rules because you fear the consequences.
If your personal code aligns with those big rules, that’s a perfectly acceptable situation.  You’ve got no reason to break those rules.  But what if your personal code dictates you behave contrary to those rules?  In that case, you’re faced with a choice: abide by the rules and live the life of a hypocrite, change your code, or break the rules.
The problem is that some rules cross lines that you cannot abide being crossed.  Worse, some rules aren’t even rules: they’re just people using assumed authority and threat of force to intimidate you into submission.  An excellent recent example of this is the incident at Cliven Bundy’s ranch.  The link I included is a somewhat neutral summary of the situation, though if you do any research, you’ll find a great deal more that wasn’t mentioned in that story, such as the government placing snipers on hilltops, the government shooting or running his cattle to death and then dumping them in mass graves, and so on.  But the important point to be made here is that this is the story of a family (and, by extension, a whole lot of other people) who decided they’d had enough of being pushed around and, right or wrong, stood up for what they believed in.  Based on the response from thousands of people, both local and remote, who traveled to his ranch to stand by him (some taking up their own sniper positions, just in case), there are plenty of other people who have had enough as well.  It doesn’t matter whose side you take on this particular incident; what matters is the recognition that there are lines in the sand past which individuals will not be pushed, regardless of the consequences.  Those lines differ for each person, but we all have them.  It’s important to learn where your lines are, and understand how you’ll react when faced with that situation, because there will be consequences.
John Parker understood this at the Battle of Lexington when he told his men, “Stand your ground. Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.”  The consequence was the beginning of the Revolutionary War.  Without men unwilling to bow to the threat of force, this country wouldn’t exist.  It was men — average, everyday men, who’d had all they could take — who decided that their principles overrode the rules imposed on them by England, and gave us the chance to live free.
Don’t squander it.  Don’t be one of the flock.  Live by your principles.  Act according to your beliefs in all things, big and small.  Be a wolf.

There's  been a tremendous amount of events since my last post.  It is not that I didn't have anything to post or that I was done posting.  It is more that I tend to freeze and listen carefully when I find a new threshold being crossed.

Anyway,

One of those must read thangs....it is loaded with info on 'mind-war'.

https://eliasalias.com/2014/05/05/reflections-on-oas/

Very interesting...
Ranking Senator Describes “Bizarre” Secret Meeting At Obama White House
http://theulstermanreport.com/2014/05/25/ranking-senator-describes-bizarre-secret-meeting-at-obama-white-house/

by Ulsterman on May 25, 2014 with 2 Comments in News


For those paying attention, just more of the same, but for Senator Bob Corker, a ranking member of the powerful Senate Foreign PolicyCommittee, a recent sit down at the Obama  White House was a large serving of the bizarre.


more at link above.

Greenwald To Name Americans Spied On By NSA
   http://crooksandliars.com/2014/05/greenwald-name-americans-spied-nsa
       http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/05/26/greenwalds_finale_naming_victims_of_surveillance_122747.html

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/05/intelligence-committee-refused-require-identification-targets-assassinated.html

...let's change the committee's name to make it more accurate...instead of 'intelligence' committee because there's not much intelligent, intuitive, or empathetic about it, let's call it committee of cold, disconnected killers (CCDK). Because it's what happens to people who start off doing it at animal reserves and then move on to using it in war...logic does not equate to intelligence or qualities we accept within the definition of being human.

TJ just posted an interesting piece:

Theresa Morris
Marina Popvich Russian Cosmonaut Confirms UFOS
acir.us
MOSCOW, RUSSIAN FEDERATION – Cosmonaut Marina Popovich, who is a Hero of the Soviet Union, holds 102 world records, is in the Guinness Book of World Records, disclosed her personal experiences with UFOs and her knowledge of the...

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302518p.pdf

No Chai Me Up wot DJ Piper Steampunk, tonight. Bummer.

Unfortunately there is bad news in the wind which bears mentioning...Bobo's Pronouncement was the title of the email....


The system is still bugnuts about extinguishing parental rights and there's been quite a bit of news about that lately. An easy google.

And the question of the week is: what has Vladimir Putin done to merit such enmity and disrespect from America's ruling elites?

~ Oh I don't know, but maybe it started with Medved's statement a year ago followed by all the policy influence declaration and response chatter that ran a few months beginning in January?


I------- Europe
Jun 10 (1 day ago)

to bcc: me
so they can take out the Taliban anywhere, but they can't find a Boeing 777 with 230+ persons on board....

Is it just me, or is something wrong with all this ????

enclosed: pdf titled - The US 'Ability' to Take Out Taliban Released For Bergdahl Isn't So Tidy

END QUOTE

If it weren't for the number of lives aboard, it'd be funny. But loss of life ain't funny. And Murderers running amok at the expense of the taxpayers is worse. What's worse than that? How about a corruption that thinks this kind of conduct is acceptable.

Emails have been by the truck load this last two weeks and I have barely had time to sort through them let alone come in here and put much up.

A couple of irons in the works we'll see if they pan out...

So I have a question.  Is this how the top 50 corporations, NWO peons, and Illumined Ones plan on getting out of 2017?





If so that's pretty chicken sht pathetic.  Even the Fomhoire, 8000-6000 years ago, didn't stoop that low.

Full spectrum dominance is apparently defined as chicken-sht-pathetic acts of idiocy.

In the style of the Alaskan Bush People family documentary, I put it this way:  

Are you listening you jelly-heads!?!  Knock it off!

Cy

Ok so there's few things that tick me off more than a handful of links refusing email forwarding.  They wouldn't even go via attached doc.  Censorship my arse.  There's more than one way to skin a cat.  

And since I find it so annoying I might as well sweeten the deal here with some of what we're discussing...

SOSDD ISIS notes


Senior NSA Executive: We’re In a Police

State
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/senior-nsa-executive-were-in-a-police-state_062014

Rounded up to be killed: ISIS militants

seize dozens of Iraqi soldiers before

driving them to the desert to be shot
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658286/Return-Mosul-Days-Iraqs-second-

largest-city-fell-feard-Isis-fighters-

Iraqis-heading-promise-food-gas-water.html

HORROR! Bloody ISIS MASS EXECUTION in a

Ditch Near Tikrit (PHOTOS);THE WHITEHOUSE

HAS BECOME 'THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE' AS IT

STANDS BY AND DOES NOTHING HERE IT IS

AMERICA- BLOOD GUILTINESS
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/06/horror-isis-executes-dozens-of-iraqis-in-a-

ditch-near-tikrit-photos/

Russia on Iraq: ‘We told you so’:'We are

greatly alarmed by what is happening in

Iraq. We warned long ago that the affair

that the Americans and the Britons stirred

up there wouldn't end well,' Russian

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said

Wednesday,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/06/12/russia-on-iraq-we-told-you-so/

How Isis have rampaged towards the capital:

A blow by blow account of how Islamist

militants outnumbered 20-to-1 by the army

cut through huge swathes of Iraq
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658176/How-Isis-rampaged-capital-A-blow-blow-account-Islamist-militants-outnumbered-20-1-army-cut-huge-swathes-

Iraq.html

Air Force in 'Stand Down' Position as 100

American Contractors Attacked by ISIS

Jihadists
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/air-force-stand-position-100-american-contractors-attacked-isis-jihadists/

AMERICA’S ALLIES ARE FUNDING ISIS Key

component of ISIS’s support came from Arab

Gulf States of Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi

Arabia
http://www.infowars.com/americas-allies-are-funding-isis/

'I'll see you guys in New York:' US

commander who was ordered to hand captured

ISIS leader-to-be to Iraqis in 2009 reveals

chilling parting words of fanatic who is

leading extremist march on Baghdad
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2658041/Ill-guys-New-York-Ominous-parting-

words-future-ISIS-leader-US-reservists-

Long-Island-released-detention-camp-

2009.html

Judge Jeanine  Tonight I'm Worried...  

You Need To Be Afraid!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXIHII2hQws

END doc





Massive blowback in Iraq
Inbox
x

Brasscheck TV via aweber.com
7:14 AM (31 minutes ago)

to me
===================
BrasscheckTV Report
===================

If US troops end up fighting
in Iraq again...

They will be facing US armed
and US trained fighters who
the US got into bed with as
recently as 2012.

The cycles of 'blowback' are
getting faster and faster.

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/26817.html

- Brasscheck TV

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV with your
friends and colleagues.

================================

Miss a broadcast?

All Brasscheck TV broadcasts are backed up on
Facebook and Twitter

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BrasscheckTV

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrasscheckTV

Going on vacation? Write us back and
we'll turn your subscription off and back on.
Just give us the start and stop dates.

================================

How Brasscheck TV works:

You'll receive two videos every day.

One short one in the morning (US eastern time)
and one longer program in the evening.

(Don't worry, you don't have to watch them all!)

You can watch them later or delete -- whichever you prefer.

If your email box is getting filled up you can unsubscribe
at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of every
Brasscheck e-mail.

Don't forget you can follow us on Facebook and instead of
receiving emails you can view our latest broadcasts on your
timeline at your own convenience.

Click here to follow us:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BrasscheckTV
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

*******************


FROM EMAIL

---- Group
7:37 AM (9 minutes ago)

to me
This comment stream from a fighter pilot colleague says it all..... T
--------------------------
B----,

It’s much worse than bull sh--. You can go find a bull sh--scooper and scoop up bull sh--- !

What we have now in the State Department are a bevy of idiot moron female “children” (dateless for their senior prom because they were demonstrating that night) who have finally, after years of throwing temper tantrums, marching with large signs that say “ SAVE THE UPPER SLOBAVOVIAN DUNG BEETLE” , attending rallies with bon-fires at college where some guy who hasn’t bathed in six months burns the American Flag, finally getting that “dream job” at the State Department where they can live out their fantasy of “being in charge of things”.

If you look real closely at these “girls” of Obama’s legion when they offer back some smart arse answer to a legitimate question, and look directly into their eyes, you can actually make a case that if the answer specifically avoids the question and instead makes points for their deep left agenda, they just might simultaneously be experiencing an orgasm !  :-))
D---

From: Cyrellys
Sent: ‎6/‎19/‎2014 15:14
To: ---- Group


Subject: Re: A huge crock

Kinda hard to get something accomplished in two years when the operator in question set it all up in the first place and has been sleeping with the enemy all along. While they failed to get us at war with Syria, they've managed to implode Iraq to accomplish the very same drain on our military and personnel.  Half the same as one dozen of the other.  Rosen is only scratching the surface.  He needs a bigger shovel for the sh-- pile he's working on.

Cy





On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:55 AM, ----- Group <----> wrote:
Cannot believe it ! What a huge crock of sh---.

http://youtu.be/8CP55I9Y_y8

END MSG

***************




Cyrellys <-------->
7:32 AM (19 minutes ago)

to LC GROUP


If you dug deep enough you could track it clear back through the State Dept to casablanca.  They didn't get syria but by pigs and pickles they got Iraq.  

SOSDD.

Cy


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Nac----- < --- > wrote:

RE: ISIS.  If you believe this organization just appeared like magic to confound us all, I urge you to think again.  It's there because we wanted it there.  You can do amazing things out in the open when a state actor or non-state actor hides behind a organization, especially if it is on the margin.  Being on the margin of legitimacy is important because it causes many people tend to dismiss it in disgust or in outright rejection, thus terminating any further interest in it...BAD MISTAKE.

For the geopolitical analyst there is only one mantra to keep in mind.  All Middle-Eastern regional roads lead to either Baghdad/ Teheran or to Israel/Saudi Arabia.  And the superhighway behind, which is the Anglo/American establishment.  Always remember that nature abhors a vacuum and so does politics.

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/06/the-clandestine-reasons-for-isis-taking.html

END MSG


********************





FROM EMAIL


Cyrellys <------>
8:04 AM (16 minutes ago)

to ---- GROUP-EUROPE

[size=32]ROFL![/size]
[ltr]

just wait till the great cosmic truck stop comes to visit in person to make its own statement!  I'm already stocking up on popcorn for the big event...If I weren't so far away from the rat-mobile I'd sell tix to the show too and invite all the neighbors to D-Day.  I'd serve a soda pop free of charge, a big bowl of popcorn and give a preliminary presentation on the background of the whole event.  They'd never look at politics and social engineering the same way again.

grin

Cy


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM, --------GROUP-EUROPE <------->wrote:[/ltr]

This sums it up and says it all !!!!

[ltr]



**************************


Cy says wrt to the sharks who don't like her discussing the whole great dumb show: "so here is mine:  see pic"

[/ltr]

It's a cute jpg.  But there'd be more ironic justice involved if it read:

Please do not annoy the writer, or she may put you in a book and let the fat woman sit on you.  Ride 'em cowgirl!

Evil Grin...Cy
[ltr]END MSG[/ltr]


[ltr]__________[/ltr]


FROM EMAIL

N------
8:12 AM (12 minutes ago)

to me, LC GROUP

LOL!  I listened to the bummer man, when he shashayed into a packed auditorium in Reno, NV, grinned like a son of a bitch, unhooked his tie, took of his jacket, rolled up his sleeves and then launched into a tirade about how GB was a war criminal, stressing that the first thing he'd do would be to restore Habeas Corpus, and see about prosecuting Bushies for war crimes.  My two friends, who were impressed with BO asked me what I thought.  I said, the dude was an actor, a flim-flam man.  They got upset with me, said I was a sourpuss, a man without hope or vision.  Oh, well...live and learn, huh?



From: Cyrellys <-------->
To: LC GROUP

Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 7:34 AM
Subject: Fwd: Obama to leaders: Iraq plan won't require congressional vote

SOSDD like I said.  Cy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: America Conservative 2 Conservative
Date: Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:29 AM
Subject: Obama to leaders: Iraq plan won't require congressional vote
To: "cyrellys@-------" <--------->

http://moonbattery.com/graphics/obama-hypocrite.jpg" border="0" alt="obama-hypocrite" /> [size=32]Obama to leaders: Iraq plan won't require congressional vote[/size]   By Justin Sink and Alexander Bolton President Obama told congressional leaders Wednesday that he didn't expect to ask for congressional approval of military action in Iraq. “The president briefed us on the situation in Iraq and indicated he didn't feel he had any need for authority from us for steps that he might take and indicated that he would keep us posted,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters after the hour-long meeting at the White House. Separately, a congressional source familiar with the meeting said Obama pledged to keep leaders posted on his decision-making process. The source said Obama told the four leaders that he did not plan to ask for congressional authority on any action anytime soon, because he did not expect to order any action that he felt  would require congressional approval. The source said Obama specifically said he did not plan to launch air strikes, though drone strikes may be a possibility. Earlier Wednesday, the White House refused to answer questions on whether Obama felt he needed — or wanted — congressional authorization were he to launch airstrikes against Sunni militants marching toward Baghdad. “I'm not going to engage in hypotheticals about action the president might take, since, as we discussed earlier, he is still reviewing his options when it comes to direct action,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said. “So I think I would say we'll cross that bridge when we get there, if we get there.” Obama met Wednesday afternoon with McConnell, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). None of the congressional leaders spoke to reporters gathered at the White House, a sign that could indicate the administration has yet to make any concrete decision on steps in Iraq. After he returned to the Capitol, Reid told reporters that it was a “good meeting” and that “everybody seemed satisfied.” “The president is going to keep us as informed as he can as the process moved forward,” Reid said. Obama has been wrestling with the decision of whether to launch air or drone strikes against Iraq, but White House officials have repeatedly said no decision has been made. A military strike against the extremists would appear permissible under a 2002 resolution authorizing the use of military force within the country, and House Minority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and other Democrats this week endorsed the idea that it would cover air strikes launched by the Obama administration. But the administration has previously called for that resolution's repeal, and Carney reiterated that desire on Wednesday. He also said the legislation “no longer is used for any U.S. government activities.” Wednesday's meeting was described as the White House as “part of a process of consultation with Congress,” and Obama was expect to lay out generally his approach toward the developing crisis there. According to White House officials, the president has focused his work on the issue on three areas: how to confront the imminent threat from the Sunni extremists, how to foster Iraqi security forces over the short and long term, and how to pressure Iraqi leaders into more inclusive governance. While the president is considering military action as a tool toward those efforts, the deployment of troops to Iraq remains off the table. Other lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have said that regardless of the existing resolution, Obama needs to get congressional approval before any airstrike. “I certainly believe that the president always has to get congressional approval,” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee. “If there’s an emergency, you may need to come back and get a congressional ratification. That’s the way the process is supposed to work.” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) concurred, calling the existing legislation “functionally obsolete.” And Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said any airstrikes should get fresh authorization. “A new war has started, and if people want to go be involved in a new war, the job of Congress is to vote on it,” he said. “I don’t think you can have a Congress of 10 years ago make a decision for the people here 10 years later.” Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/defense/209838-obama-to-leaders-iraq-plan...  [size=32]Make your comments HERE:[/size]   Laura J Alcorn, National Director Let's  Invite More to our social network.   Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on  Facebook and follow us on twitter Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

END MSG

Turning simple questions into paradigm shift tools...

My latest article over on hubpages is yet another dialog on process wrt to the social engineering pre-unambiguous contact event.  

http://cyrellys.hubpages.com/hub/Back-alley-arguments-over-todays-SCOTUS-decision-on-Hobby-Lobby-contraceptive-case

The exopolitical elements are in the latter half of the article.

---->>>>

FOLLOW UP DIALOG

Naconah
10:45 AM (1 hour ago)

to me, Nicolas, Bob, Bo, Lei, Melody, Cliff, Joe, Paul, liberty, lostwoodradio, Sirius


[ltr]Once again Vladimir Putin appears to be charting an independent course vis the unipolar and preponderance of power axis of the United States and its globalist allies.

Why is he doing this?  Astute observers noticed several years ago the chauvinistic tendencies of the Russian president, which appeared at odds with globalist world views.

Is he going off the reservation and charting an independent course in international affairs that rest on pursuing Russian interests rather than global interests?  If this is so, it clarifies the West's frenzied attempt to demonize him as a deal breaker and a new Hitler upsetting the European political landscape.

There is another very intriguing element relevant to Putin's conduct of foreign policy.  It seemed that Russia and China were embracing each other in a strategic partnership to offset the west.  Why would this be so if both states were satisfied with their roles as part of the globalist milieu?  China appeared to be relegated by the globalist cabal to play the part of the globalist's policeman and center of the world's medium technology manufacturing.  Therefore, why the need of the Chinese to seek strategic defense accords with Russia?  Could it be that Russia detected uncertainty in China's worldviews and dissatisfaction with the cabal over the Chinese role in global affairs?  Despite the policy of engagement toward China and Russia, it is obvious by NATO's march into eastern Europe and into Asia that the west was really bent on a policy of containment.

However, Russia agreed to further Chinese acquisition of the SU-27 technology (arguably the very best air supremacy fighter in the world) and other advanced Russian military weapons.  The two nations have been conducting mammoth military exercises.   China has avoided condemning Russia over its incorporation of the Crimea.  Historically, there have always been intense geopolitical tensions between Russia and China, especially over Siberia.  Therefore, the question.  Why would Putin give a possible hostile China advanced military technology that could be used against Russia at some time in the future?

Could it be that China is not entirely comfortable with its assigned role in future global politics and fears betrayal by the west, especially in light that the west is beefing up its military posture in Asia in furthering an Asian pivot?  Does the west intend to renege on its commitments to Chinese interests?  Does the United States intend to disavow its financial obligations to China?

Who is the target audience of Putin's recent statements?  Is it the international diplomatic corp, heads of states, or is he reaching beyond to speak directly to the world's people on very sensitive topics that are customarily aired in state reception halls?

Putin's recent pointed statements that Russia can reveal who the primary actors in the 9/11 tragedy
were, Russia's several telling rebuffs of Obama and caustic denunciations of NATO and of the west's perfidy in the Ukraine do not follow the script, if Putin is just another bit player on the global stage.

Consequently, who is Vladimir Putin, what is Putin's real foreign policy and why is he deviating from the globalist script?  The world cannot afford to underestimate this man nor to overestimate him. Yet Vladimir Putin appears to be running rings around the cabal and the globalists seem unable to, or unwilling to stop him. Putin's truculent example of defiance and independence may prompt other disaffected states to follow and breakaway from the globalist matrix.  And that can collapse the globalists tripod of interests resting on a global monetary system, a global military power, and a world government, leading to conclusions that all is not well in the emerging one world government movement.

Josey Wales
[/ltr]

---

[ltr]
From: Cyrellys 
To: Naconah  
Cc: LC Group
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: War Warning per Snowden


For the back ground to this wrestling match over the content in those documents be sure to see that article on the health care issue at Hubpages.com I forwarded the links to all of you.  At the bottom of the article in the "here" and "here" links within the exopolitics section of the article is the bone I passed to the general population.  This is confirmation of paradigm from the inside.  It is as close to "disclosure" as they can get without facing the axe at this time.  All the pieces of the paradigm are inter-related.

Cy


On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Naconah wrote:
[/ltr]

Government Stops Glenn Greenwald from Publishing His Big Snowden Revelation … But Others Will Release ALL of the Snowden Documents to Prevent a War

			Government Stops Glenn Greenwald from Publishing His ... The Best in Uncensored News Information and Analysis
			View on www.blacklistednew...	Preview by Yahoo

Lee Ho Fook

From Cryptome - 1 July 2014
Vocativ Interviews Cryptome on Snowden Releases
http://cryptome.org/2014/07/vocativ-interview.htm

Manticore Group's official website: http://manticoregroup.wordpress.com/

follow the shared portions of discussion involving current events, globalism, conspiracy theory, and corruption that has included exopolitics at the same table. Members include researchers, former LEO's, militia members, currently serving political representatives, authors, and more.

Cy